CALCULI IN ARTIFICIAL URETHRA
- Autores: Larionov I.N1, Sapelko V.N1, Belozerov N.Y.1, Romanov G.V1
-
Afiliações:
- FSBI «Combined Hospital with Polyclinic» of the Administrative Department of President of the Russian Federation
- Edição: Nº 3 (2014)
- Páginas: 79-81
- Seção: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/1728-2985/article/view/280207
- ID: 280207
Citar
Texto integral
Acesso aberto
Acesso está concedido
Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes
Acesso está concedido
Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes
Resumo
The article presents a successful experience of the treatment of longterm complication of urethroplasty performed by the modified Cecil - Culp procedure using flap of skin of the scrotum with preserved hair follicles. The removal of calculi in artificial urethra occurring decades after the surgery was required. The use of combined method of treatment led to a good clinical outcome.
Palavras-chave
Texto integral
Sobre autores
I. Larionov
FSBI «Combined Hospital with Polyclinic» of the Administrative Department of President of the Russian Federation
Email: igla1951@gmail.com
PhD in Medical Sciences, Head of the Urological Department Moscow
V. Sapelko
FSBI «Combined Hospital with Polyclinic» of the Administrative Department of President of the Russian FederationUrological Department Moscow
N. Belozerov
FSBI «Combined Hospital with Polyclinic» of the Administrative Department of President of the Russian FederationUrological Department Moscow
G. Romanov
FSBI «Combined Hospital with Polyclinic» of the Administrative Department of President of the Russian FederationUrological Department Moscow
Bibliografia
- Cecil A.B. Repair of hipospadias and uretral fistula. J Urol. 1946; 56:237-242.
- Culp O.S. Struggles and triumphs with hypospadias and associated anomalies: review of 400 cases. J Urol. 1966;96(3):339-351.
- Kelalis P.P., Benson R.C. Jr, Culp O.S. Complications of single and multistage operations for hypospadias: a comparative review. J Urol. 1977;118(4):657-658.
- Andrich D.E., Dunglison N., Greenwell T.J. et al. The long-term results of urethroplasty. J Urol. 2003;170(1):90-92.
- Русаков В.И. Хирургия мочеиспускательного канала. Ростов-на-Дону: «Феникс». 1998. С. 261-265.
- Marshall M. Jr, Johnson S.H. 3rd, Price S.E. Jr, Barnhouse D.H. Cecil urethroplasty with concurrent scrotoplasty for repair of hypospadias. J Urol. 1979;121(3):335-338.
- Marberger H., Pauer W. Experience in hypospadias repair. Urol. Clin. North. Am. 1981;8(3):403-419.
- Schreiter F. Two-stage urethra-plasty. Urologe A. 1998;37(1):42-50.
- Kekre N.S. Urethral stricture disease - Have we found the magic wand? Indian J Urol. 2011;27(3):303-304.
- Ehle J.J., Cooper C.S., Peche W.J. et al. Application ofthe Cecil-Culp repair for treatment of urethrocutaneous fistulas after hypospadia ssurgery. Urology. 2001;57(2):347-350.
- Wessells H., Morey A.F., McAninch J.W. Single stage reconstruction of complex anterior urethral strictures: combined tissue transfer techniques. J Urol. 1997;157(4):1271-1274.
- Bhargava S., Chapple C.R. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: is it the new gold standard? BJU Int. 2004;93(9):1191-1193.
- Andrich D.E., Mundy A.R. What is the best technique for urethroplasty? Eur. Urol. 2008;54(5):1031-1041.