New options of endoscopic treatment for kidney and ureter stones in obese patients
- Autores: Martov AG1, Dutov SV1, Andronov AS1, Kilchukov ZI2, Tahaev RA3
-
Afiliações:
- City Hospital № 57
- Republican Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Health of Kabardino-Balkar Republic
- Department of Endoscopic Urology
- Edição: Nº 4 (2015)
- Páginas: 55-63
- Seção: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/1728-2985/article/view/281738
- ID: 281738
Citar
Texto integral
Acesso está concedido
Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes
Resumo
In the remaining patients residual stone fragments were not clinically important. The most prevalent postoperative complication in all groups was postoperative pyelonephritis. Taking into account high efficiency of transurethral lithotripsy and PCNL in the supine position, as well as their combinations we can recommend these interventions to treat patients with kidney and ureteral stones and concomitant obesity.
Sobre autores
A Martov
City Hospital № 57City Hospital № 57
S Dutov
City Hospital № 57City Hospital № 57
A Andronov
City Hospital № 57City Hospital № 57
Z Kilchukov
Republican Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Health of Kabardino-Balkar RepublicRepublican Clinical Hospital, Ministry of Health of Kabardino-Balkar Republic
R Tahaev
Department of Endoscopic UrologyDepartment of Endoscopic Urology
Bibliografia
- Willett W., Dietz W., Colditz G. Guidelines for healthy weight.
- Попова И.Р. Клиническая характеристика и распространенность ожирения по данным поликлинического отделения многопрофильной клиники. Дис. докт. мед. наук. М., 2013.
- Taylor E., Stampfer M, Curhan G. Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA. 2005;293:455-462. 4.
- DuffeyB., PedroR., KriedbergC., WeilandD., Melquist J., Ikramuddin S., Kellogg T, Makhlouf A.A., Monga M. Lithogenic risk factors in the morbidly obese population. J. Urol. 2008;179:1401-1406.
- Stevens J., Cai J., Pamuk E., Williamson D., Thun M., Wood J. The effect of age on the association between body-mass index and mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998;338:1-7.
- Дутов С.В., Мартов А.Г., Андронов А.С. Чрескожная нефролитотрипсия на спине. Урология. 2011;2:76-80.
- Murota-Kawano A., Ohya K., Sekine H. Outpatient basis extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureter stones: efficacy of the third generation lithotripter as the first line treatment. Int. J. Urol. 2008;15:210-215.
- Hammad F., Balakrishnan A. The effect of fat and nonfat components of the skin-to-stone distance on shockwave lithotripsy outcome. J. Endourol. 2010;24:1825-1829.
- Delakas D., Karyotis I., Daskalopoulos G., Lianos E., Mavromanolakis E. Independent predictors of failure of shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones employing a second-generation lithotripter. J. Endourol. 2003;17:201-205.
- Olivi B., Vedrine N., Costilles T., Boiteux J.P., Guy L. Extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy in patients with body mass index over 35 kg/ m2. Prog. Urol. 2011;21:254-259.
- Munoz R., Tirolien P., Belhamou S., Desta M., Grimberg R., Dulys P., Chevallier H. Treatment of reno-ureteral lithiasis with ESWL in obese patients. Apropos of 150 patients. Arch. Esp. Urol. 2003;56:933-938.
- Pump B., Talleruphuus U., Christensen N., Warberg J., Norsk P. Effects of supine, prone and lateral positions on cardiovascular and renal variables in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2002;283:R174-180.
- Doizi S., Letendre J., Bonneau C., Gil Diez de Medina S., Traxer O. Comparative study of the treatment of renal stones with flexible ureterorenoscopy in normal weight, obese, and morbidly obese patients. Urology. 2015;85(1):38-44.
- Chew B., Zavaglia B., Paterson R., Teichman J., Lange D., Zappavigna C., Matlaga B., Nunez-Nateras R., Bruhn A., Altamar H., Humphreys M., Shah O., Miller N. A multicenter comparison of the safety and effectiveness of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy in obese and normal weight patients. J. Endourol. 2013;27(6):710-714. 15.
- Valdivia Uria J., Valle Gerhold J., Lopez Lopez J., Villarroya Rodriguez S., Ambroj Navarro C., Ramirez Fabian M., Rodriguez Bazalo J.M., Sanchez Elipe M.A. Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in the supine position. J. Urol. 1998;160:1975-1978. 16.
- De Sio M., Autorino R., Quarto G., Calabro F., Damiano R., Giugliano F., Mordente S., D'Armiento M. Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trial. Eur. Urol. 2008;54:196-202.
- Scoffone C., Cracco C., Cossu M., Grande S., Poggio M., Scarpa R. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urol. 2008;54/6:1393-1403.
- Grasso M., Nord R., Bagley D. Prone split leg and flank roll positioning: simultaneous anterograde and retrograde access to the upper urinary tract. J. Endourol. 1993;7:307-310.
- Shoma A., Erakay I., El-Kenawy M., El-Kappany H. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: technical aspects and functional outcome compared with the prone technique. Urology. 2002;60:388-392.
- Rana A., Bhojwani J., Junejo N., Das Bhagia S. Tubeless PCNL with patient in supine position: procedure for all seasons? - with comprehensive technique. Urology. 2008;71:581-585.