Endoscopic marsupialization of parapelvic renal cysts


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Introduction. Parapelvic renal cysts are very common. Indications for surgical treatment are upper urine tract obstruction, pain and recurrent gross hematuria. Aim. To analyze the efficiency and safety of endoscopic transurethral and percutaneous laser marsupialization of parapelvic renal cysts. Materials and methods. A total of 9 patients were undergone to transurethral intrarenal marsupialization of parapelvic renal cysts from March 2016 to February 2021 (4 men, 5 women, aged 42-78 years). Another 2 patients (2 men, aged 46 and 52 years) were treated by percutaneous approach. The average size of the cyst according to contrast-enhanced multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) was 3.1±1.8 cm. In two cases, papillary tumor of the pelvis was suspected. The anteroposterior diameter of the pelvis was 2.6±1.3 cm; 9 patients had pain in the loin area, while in 7 patients recurrent gross hematuria was also an indication for surgical treatment. For marsupialization, a holmium (Ho:YAG) laser Auriga XL (Boston Scientific, USA) was used in 4 patients, and in other cases (n=7) a procedure was performed using a thulium fiber laser (Tm Fiber) Fiberlase U1 (IRE-Polus, Russia). In 3 patients, to clarify the site of incision of the cyst, intraoperative ultrasound was used. In all cases, after draining the cyst, an internal stent was placed inside the cyst for a period of 4-6 weeks. Results. The duration of transurethral surgery was 26±11 minutes, while percutaneous marsupialization of the cyst, which was performed in combination with percutaneous nephrolithotomy, took 10 and 18 minutes, respectively. The average catheterization time was 12±8 hours. Nephrostomy tube was removed on the 2nd day. The length of stay was 4±2 days. Febrile fever was noted in 1 patient (9%), which required a change in antibiotic therapy. During ultrasound control at discharge, the dilatation of the collecting system was not detected in any cases, while the residual cavity was found in 2 patients (18%). Follow-up contrast-enhanced MSCT and ultrasound within 3-30 months in all patients (n=11) showed no dilatation of the collecting system. In 1 (9%) patient, the residual cavity was preserved with a decrease in size to 1.2 cm without signs of upper urinary tract obstruction; the initial diameter of the cyst in this patient was 4.9 cm. There was no recurrence of gross hematuria. Conclusions. In our opinion, transurethral and percutaneous laser marsupialization of parapelvic renal cysts is an effective and safe method that allows definitive treatment for cysts up to 4 cm in size. If the cyst is larger than 4 cm, endoscopic removal should be balanced with the possibility of preserving the residual cavity. The most common complication of endoscopic treatment of intrarenal cysts is acute pyelonephritis with a rate of 9%.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

A. Martov

A.I. Burnazyan SRC FMBC FMBA of Russia; GBUZ “City clinical hospital named after D.D. Pletnev of the Health Department c. Moscow”; Medical Scientific and Educational Center of Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: martovalex@mail.ru
Ph.D., MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Urology and Andrology; leading researcher at the Department of Urology and Andrology of Medical Scientific and Educational Center; Head of the urologic department Moscow, Russia; Moscow, Russia

D. Yagudaev

A.I. Burnazyan SRC FMBC FMBA of Russia

Email: yagudaev.david@mail.ru
resident at the Department of Urology and Andrology Moscow, Russia

D. Ergakov

A.I. Burnazyan SRC FMBC FMBA of Russia; GBUZ “City clinical hospital named after D.D. Pletnev of the Health Department c. Moscow”

Email: dergakov@mail.ru
Ph.D., associate professor at the Department of Urology and Andrology; urologist at the Urologic department Moscow, Russia; Moscow, Russia

N. Baikov

GBUZ “City clinical hospital named after D.D. Pletnev of the Health Department c. Moscow”

Email: dr.baykov@mail.ru
urologist at the Urologic department Moscow, Russia

A. Andronov

A.I. Burnazyan SRC FMBC FMBA of Russia; GBUZ “City clinical hospital named after D.D. Pletnev of the Health Department c. Moscow”

Email: dr.andronov@mail.ru
Ph.D., associate professor at the Department of Urology and Andrology; urologist at the Urologic department Moscow, Russia; Moscow, Russia

S. Dutov

A.I. Burnazyan SRC FMBC FMBA of Russia; GBUZ “City clinical hospital named after D.D. Pletnev of the Health Department c. Moscow”

Email: hammerwise@gmail.com
Ph.D., assistant at the Department of Urology and Andrology; urologist at the Urologic department Moscow, Russia; Moscow, Russia

A. Martov

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical Univesity (Sechenov University)

Email: martov495@gmail.com
student Moscow, Russia

D. Abdullaev

GBUZ “City clinical hospital named after D.D. Pletnev of the Health Department c. Moscow”

Email: dr.david01@mail.ru
Ph.D., urologist at the Urologic department Moscow, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. Mancini V., Cormio L., d'Altilia N., Benedetto G., Ferrarese P., Balzarro M., Defidio L., Carrieri G. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Symptomatic Renal Sinus Cysts: Long-Term Results and Literature Review. Urol Int. 2018;101(2):150-155. doi: 10.1159/000488685. Epub 2018 May 2. PMID: 29719301.
  2. Rossi S.H., Koo B., Riddick A., Shah N., Stewart G.D. Different Successful Management Strategies for Obstructing Renal Parapelvic Cysts. Urol Int. 2018;101(3):366-368. doi: 10.1159/000475886. Epub 2017 May 12. PMID: 28494441.
  3. Luo Q, Zhang X, Chen H, Liu Z, Chen X, Dai Y, Zhao Z. Treatment of renal parapelvic cysts with a flexible ureteroscope.Int Urol Nephrol. 2014;46(10):1903-1908. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0741-y. Epub 2014 May 20. PMID: 24840032.
  4. Shao Z.Q., Guo F.F., Yang W.Y, Wang G.J., Tan S.F., Li H.L., He X.F., Wang J.M., Liu H.J., Xia S.J. Percutaneous intrarenal marsupialization of symptomatic peripelvic renal cysts: a single-centre experience in China. Scand J Urol. 2013;47(2):118-121. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.704942. Epub 2012 Jul 30. PMID: 22839104.
  5. Chang C.C., Kuo J.Y., Chan W.L., Chen K.K., Chang L.S. Prevalence and clinical charac-teristics of simple renal cyst. J Chin Med Assoc 2007;70:486-491.
  6. Rossi S.H., Koo B., Riddick A., Shah N., Stewart G.D. Different Successful Management Strategies for Obstructing Renal Parapelvic Cysts. Urol Int. 2018;101(3):366-368. doi: 10.1159/000475886. Epub 2017 May 12. PMID: 28494441
  7. Yoder B.M., Wolf J.S., Jr Long-term outcome of laparoscopic decortication of peripheral and peripelvic renal and adrenal cysts. J Urol. 2004;171:583- 587. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000103642.29044.71.
  8. Amar A.D., Das S. Surgical management of benign renal cysts causing obstruction of renal pelvis. Urology. 1984;24:429-433. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(84)90315-7.
  9. Kavoussi L.R., Clayman R.V., Mikkelsen D.J., Meretyk S. Ureteronephroscopic marsupialization of obstructing peripelvic renal cyst. J Urol. 1991;146(2):411-414. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37809-6. PMID: 1856944.
  10. O'Connor R.C., Guralnick M.L., Byrd G.F., Murphy M.J., Sulman A. Case report: endoscopic unroofing of symptomatic peripelvic simple renal cyst. J Endourol. 2007;21(12):1497-1499. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0469. PMID: 18186690.
  11. Li E.C., Hou J.Q., Yang L.B., Yuan H.X., Hang L.H., Alagirisamy K.K., Li D.P., Wang X.P. Pure natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery management of simple renal cysts: 2-year follow-up results. J Endourol. 2011;25(1):75-80. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0676. PMID: 21247290.
  12. Zhao Q., Huang S., Li Q., et al: Treatment of parapelvic cyst by internal drainage technology using ureteroscope and holmium laser. West Indian Med J 2015;64.
  13. Shah J.B., Whitman C., Lee M., Gupta M. Water under the bridge: 5-year outcomes after percutaneous ablation of obstructing parapelvic renal cysts. J Endourol 2007;21:1167-1170.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2022