A comparative analysis of simultaneous bilateral versus staged supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with bilateral kidney stones


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Aim. To evaluate feasibility and efficiency of simultaneous bilateral supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with bilateral kidney stones. Materials and methods. A total of 79 patients were included in prospective, randomized study. Single-stage bilateral supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed in the main group (n=37), while in control group (n=42) staged mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy was done. All interventions were performed in supine position. A type and severity of postoperative complications, changes in biomarkers of acute kidney injury including serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and cystatin C level were evaluated. The follow-up was 6 months. Results. Stone-free rate in main and control groups was 89.1% and 88.9%, respectively, while the mean duration of the surgery was 82.76 and 140.14 minutes, respectively (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in the type and rate of postoperative complications between groups. Recovery time was significantly shorter in the main group (8.44 vs. 17,76+2,41 days, respectively [p<0.05]). There were significant changes in serum creatinine and cystatin C levels on 1st day after surgery compared to baseline values and between groups. However, the level of GFR didn’t significantly change in both groups. After 1 month, an increase in GFR in the main group was 6.9% in comparison with 6.8% in control group. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that simultaneous bilateral mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with bilateral kidney stones.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

A. Panferov

Medical Center “Medassist”, “Medassist-K” Ltd

Email: panferov-uro@yandex.ru
chief

S. Kotov

FGBOU VO Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov of Minzdrav of Russia; N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital №1

Email: urokotov@mail.ru
MD, Head of the Department of Urology and Andrology

Bibliografia

  1. Васильев А.Г., Гаджиев Н.К., Тагиров Н.С., Лихтшангоф А.З. Вестник Санкт-петербургского университета. 2015;1: 91-100
  2. Кривонос О.В., Скачкова Е.И., Малхасян В.А., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Состояние, -проблемы и перспективы развития Российской урологической службы. Урология. 2012;5:5-12
  3. Turk C., Petrik A., Sarica K., Seitz C., Skolarikos A., Straub M., Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475-482.
  4. Малхасян В.А., Семенякин И.В., Иванов В.Ю., Сухих С.О., Гаджиев Н.К. Обзор осложнений перкутанной нефролитотомии и методов их лечения. Урология. 2018; 4:147-153
  5. Феофилов И.В. Бекерев Е.А. Мини-перкутаннаянефролитотомиявструктурехирургическоголечен иябольныхнефролитиазом. Вопросы урологии и андрологии. 2017; 5(1): 10-15
  6. Комяков Б.К., Гулиев Б.Г. Перкутанная нефролитотомия в положении больного на спине Урология 2012; 4: 60-64
  7. Conti M. Absence of Circadian Variations in Urine Cystatin C Allows Its Use on Urinary Samples/ M. Conti, M. Zater, K. Lallali. Clin. Chem. 2005;1(51):272-273.
  8. Ibarluzea G., Scoffone C.M., Cracco C.M., et al. Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int. 2007;100:233-236.
  9. de la Rosette J.J., Opondo D., Daels F.P., et al.; on behalf of the CROES PCNL Study Group. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2012; 62:246-250.
  10. Holman E., Salah M.A., Toth C. Comparison of 150 simultaneous bilateral and 300 unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomies. J Endourol. 2002;16:33-36.
  11. Dogan H.S., Guliyev F., Cetinkaya Y.S. et al. Importance of microbiological evaluation in management of infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007; 39: 737-742.
  12. Руденко В.И., Семенякин И.В., Малхасян В.А. Гаджиев Н.К. Мочекаменная болезнь. Урология. 2017; 2-S2:30-63
  13. Ni S., Qiyin C., Tao W. et al. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with less pain and shorter hospitalization compared with standard or small bore drainage: a metaanalysis of randomized, controlled trials. Urology 2011;77(6):1293-1298.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2019

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies