SIGNIFICANCE OF MACROANATOMIC VARIANTS OF CAVATESTICULAR AND RENOTESTICULAR COMMUNICATIONS IN THE GENESIS OF RIGHT TESTICULAR PHLEBECTASIA


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The anatomical study of 188 retroperitoneal organocomplexes by direct methods of measurement and nonparametric Spearman correlation analysis explains the significance of different types of right cavatesticular and renotesticular communications in the genesis of expansion of right testicular vein. In 74% of cases, right testicular vein (TV) ends in the inferior vena cava (IVC), and in 26% of cases - in the right renal vein (RRV). When TV ends in IVC, quantity anomaly (doubling TV) is observed in 6.94% of cases; when TV ends in RRV, such anomaly is observed in 40.9% of cases. The width of right TV in the case of its end in IVC was 3.39 ± 0.1 mm, and left TV - 2.95 ± 0.1 mm (n = 144), ie, right TV 0.5-1 mm wider than the left TV (P = 0.0008). Correlation analysis showed a weak relationship between the width of the right TV and lack of ostial valve at the end in IVC (r = -0.16, n = 144, P = 0.05). Associations of width of right TV with other factors (lack of ostial valves in the end in RRV, high location of RRV, width of the RRV, angle of return of TV to RRV, deposition of TV entry to the hilum of kidney or IVC) have not been reliably established. The moderate relationship between the width of right TV and type of entry of right inferior segmental renal vein in TV was established (r = 0.63; n = 6; P = 0.05). In a study, among all types of macroanatomical relationships with right TV, a single variant with important role in ectasia of TV was revealed - an entry of inferior segmental renal vein in the retroperitoneal segment of right TV.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

A. Tarasko

SBEI FPE "Novokuznetsk SMRI"

Email: anta19562008@yandex.ru
Department of Surgery, Urology and Endoscopy

A. Pastushkov

SBEI FPE "Novokuznetsk SMRI"

Department of Surgery, Urology and Endoscopy

参考

  1. Коган М.И., Афоко А., Тампуори Дж. и др. Варикоцеле: противоречия, проблемы. Урология. 2009; 6: 67-72.
  2. Gat Y., Zukerman Z.V., Bachar G.N. et al. Varicocele: a bilateral disease. Fertil. and Steril. 2004; 81(2): 424-429.
  3. Кадыров З.А., Теодорович О.В., Зокиров О.О. и др. Двустороннее варикоцеле: эпидемиология, клиника и диагностика. Урология. 2007; 3: 64-68.
  4. Окулов А.Б., Казанская И.В. Детская ли болезнь варикоцеле? Детская хирургия. 2009; 4: 32-36.
  5. Вальдман В.А. Сосудистый тонус (лимфатический, капиллярный, венозный). Л., Медгиз. 1960. С. 196.
  6. vse-dlya-vseh.ucoz.ru
  7. Ишметов В.Ш. Комплексный подход к хирургическому лечению варикоцеле. Автореферат канд. мед. наук. Уфа, 2005. 27 с.
  8. Ларин В.К. Вариантная анатомия центральной надпочечной, семенной, почечной вен слева и ее прикладное значение. Автореферат канд. мед. наук. Новосибирск, 1991.
  9. Пугачев А.Г., Мохов О.Г. К патогенезу варикоцеле у детей. Урология и нефрология. 1994; 1: 37-39.
  10. Braedel H.U., Steffens J., Ziegler M. et al. A possible ontogenic etiology for idiopathic left varicocele. J. Urol. 1994; 151: 62-66.
  11. Hill J.T., Green N.A., Surg Br. J. Varicocele: a review of radiological fnd anatomical fiatures in relation to surgical treatment. 1977; 64: 747-752.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2014
##common.cookie##