TECHNICAL FEATURES OF INTESTINAL URETEROPLASTY. PART 2: RIGHT-SIDED ILEOURETEROPLASTY


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Aim: To present the results of intestinal ureteroplasty and technical features of right-sided ileoureteroplasty. Material and methods: From 2001 to 2015, 78 patients underwent isolated reconstruction of the ureter using a segment of the ileum, of whom 57 (73%) and 21 (27%) patients had unilateral and bilateral operation, respectively. In total, isolated segments of the ileum were used to substitute 101 ureters including 45 (44.6%) right ureters. Results: The follow-up period ranged from 3 months to 14 years (mean 8.3 ± 0.8 years). Early postoperative complications occurred in 8 (10.2%) patients and 5 (6.4%) of them required reoperation. Long-term postoperative complications occurred in 7 (8.9%) patients and 4 required surgical treatment. All patients had good results of conservative treatment and reoperations. There were no deaths. All patients achieved restoration of urodynamics and normalization of kidney function. Conclusion: Right-sided, especially total, ileoureteroplasty is the most technically challenging among other possible options to substitute the ureter with a small bowel segment. To avoid mesenteric torsion when performing isoperistaltic ureteroplasty, the graft should be placed above and in front of the intestinal anastomosis.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

B. Komyakov

I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Email: komyakovbk@mail.ru
Department of Urology

B. Guliev

I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Email: gulievbg@mail.ru
Department of Urology

V. Ochelenko

I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Email: ochelenko-v@yandex.ru
Associate Professor at the Department of Urology

T. Al-Attar

I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Email: dr-talat@mail.ru
Department of Urology

Kh. Mkhanna

I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Email: viphussam@mail.ru
Department of Urology

A. Gaziev

I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Email: ochelenko-v@yandex.ru
Department of Urology

参考

  1. Кан Д.В. Кишечная пластика мочеточника. М.: Медицина, 1968
  2. Кучера Я. Хирургия гидронефроза и гидроуретеронефроза: Пер. с чешского. Прага: Гос. изд. мед. лит., 1963. 221 с
  3. Küss R., Chatelain C. Surgery of the ureter. Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidlberg, Berlin. 1975. 337 p
  4. Клепиков Ф.А. Отдаленные результаты кишечной пластики мочеточника. Пластическая хирургия мочевыводящих путей. Киев, 1977. С. 59-62
  5. Abdel-Halim R.E. Ileal loop replacement and restoration of kidney function in extensive bilharziasis of the ureter. Br J Urol. 1980;52:280-284
  6. Лопаткин Н.А., Шабад А.Л., Ачба Л.Н. Современная техника замещения мочеточника кишкой. Вестник хирургии им. И.И. Грекова. 1978;120(2): 118-124
  7. Карпенко В.С. Кишечная пластика мочеточника в лечении приобретенных обструктивных уретерогидронефрозов. Урология 2001; 2: 3-6
  8. Стаховский Э.А., Вукалович П.С., Войленко О.А. и др. Показания и особенности интестинальной пластики мочеточника. Материалы Пленума правления Российского общества урологов. СПб., 2008. С. 285-286
  9. Boxer R.J., Fritzsche P., Skinner D.G. et al. Replacement of the ureter by small intestine: clinical application and results of the ileal ureter in patients. J. Urol. 1979;121:728.
  10. Armatys S.A., Mellon M.J., Beck S.D.W., Koch M.O., Foster R.S., Bihrle R. Use of Ileum as Ureteral Replacement in Urological Reconstruction. J Urol. 2009;181(1):177-181.
  11. Komyakov B.K., Ochelenko V.A. Long-term results of 50 ureteral replacements with ileum Eur. Urol. 2013;12:P.e562.
  12. Комяков Б.К., Очеленко В.А. Результаты кишечной пластики мочеточников. Урология. 2013;3:5-9
  13. Комяков Б.К. Кишечная и аппендикулярная пластика мочеточников. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа. 2015. 416 с

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
##common.cookie##