Two Traditions in the Madhyamaka-Prāsaṅgika School: Buddhapālita and Candrakīrti
- 作者: Burmistrov S.L.1
-
隶属关系:
- Institute of Oriental Manuscripts RAS
- 期: 卷 20, 编号 3 (2023)
- 页面: 57-69
- 栏目: Research works
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/1811-8062/article/view/546024
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.55512/WMO546024
- ID: 546024
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
There are two schools in the Mahāyāna Buddhist school of Madhyamaka, namely Prāsaṅgika, the more radical one, according to which absolutely all propositions and theories are empty, for every concept in them refers only to other concepts but not to the extraconceptual reality, and Svātantrika that allows the existence of propositions sensible on the level of relative reality. But in Prāsaṅgika itself there were two traditions that differed not in the principles of philosophy but in the character of commenting the basic Madhyamaka text, “Root stanzas on the Middle Way” by Nāgārjuna. These traditions were represented in the commentaries by Buddhapālita (the 5th–6th centuries) and Candrakīrti (the 7th century). Candrakīrti’s commentary is based on Nāgārjuna’s autocommentary Akutobhaya to a much greater extent than Buddhapālita’s one. The latter presents a tradition of commenting Mūla-madhyamaka-kārikā that originates not from Nāgārjuna himself but from a disciple of his.
作者简介
Sergei Burmistrov
Institute of Oriental Manuscripts RAS
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: SLBurmistrov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5455-9788
http://www.orientalstudies.ru/eng/index.php?option=com_personalities&Itemid=74&person=671
Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Leading Researcher, Section of South Asian Studies, the Department of Central Asian and South Asian Studies
俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg参考
- Akira Saito. A Study of the Buddhapālita-Mūlamadhyamaka-Vṛtti. PhD thesis. Canberra: Australian National University, 1984 (in English).
- Androsov, Valery P. Uchenie Nāgārjuny o Sredinnosti [Nāgārjuna’s Teaching on the Middle Way]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura, 2006 (in Russian).
- Burmistrov, Sergey L. Problema ontologicheskoi samostoiatel’nosti v filosofii indiiskoi mahaiany [The Problem of Ontological Independence in the Philosophy of Indian Mahāyāna]. Pis’mennye pamiatniki Vostoka, 2022, vol. 19, no. 1 (iss. 48), pp. 19–32 (in Russian). doi: 10.17816/WMO100087.
- Descartes, René. “Razmyshleniia o pervoi filosofii, v koikh dokazyvaetsia sushchestvovanie boga i razlichie mezhdu chelovecheskoi dushoi i telom” [Meditations on the First Philosophy, in which the Existence of God and the Immortality of the Soul are Demonstrated]. Transl. from Latin by S.Y. Sheinman-Topstein. In: Dekart R. Sochineniia v 2 t. T. 2 [Descartes R. Works in 2 vols. Vol. 2]. Moscow: Mysl’, 1994, pp. 3–72 (in Russian).
- Kanayeva, Natalia A. “Apohavāda”. In: Stepaniants M.T. (ed.). Filosofiia buddizma: Entsiklopediia [Buddhist Philosophy: An Encyclopedia]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura, 2011, pp. 113–116 (in Russian).
- Lucid Exposition of the Middle Way: The Essential Chapters from the Prasannapadā of Candrakīrti. Transl. by M. Sprung. Boulder: Prajñā Press, 1979 (in English).
- Nāgārjuna. Mūlamadhyamakakārikās (Mādhyamikasūtras) avec la Prasannapadā commentaire de Candrakīrti. Publié par Louis de la Vallée Poussin. St. Pétersbourg: Académie Impériale des Sciences, 1903 (in Sanskrit).
- Nāgārjuna. Madhyamakaśāstra with the Commentary “Prasannapadā” by Candrakīrti. Ed. by P.L. Vaidya. Darbhanga: The Mithila Institute of Post-Graduate Studies and Research in Sanskrit Learning, 1960 (in Sanskrit).
- Rudoi, Valery I. Chetyre sistemy buddiiskoi klassicheskoi religiozno-filosofskoi mysli [Four Systems of Buddhist Classical Religious and Philosophical Thought]. In: Buddiiskii vzgliad na mir [Buddhist Worldview]. Ed. by E.P. Ostrovskaia and V.I. Rudoi. St. Petersburg: Andreev i synov’ia, 1994, pp. 47–88 (in Russian).
- Santina, Peter. Madhyamaka Schools in India. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1995 (in English).
- Sharma, Dhirendra. The Differentiation Theory of Meaning in Indian Logic. The Hague–Paris: Mouton, 1969 (in English).