Sindrom obstruktivnoy defekatsii: sovremennye printsipy diagnostiki i konservativnogo lecheniya


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Obstructed defecation syndrome is a fairly common condition that requires an individual approach to the patient and the broader view on the problem of chronic constipation. Complex pathogenesis imposes need for detailed examination with the assistance of specialists oriented to the pelvic descension syndrome and dysfunction of the pelvic organs. Conservative treatment of obstructive defecation is a very important stage that requires long-term use of drugs and the use of techniques for the restoration of function of the pelvic organs (in particular, posterior pelvic floor).

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Bibliografia

  1. Пасечников В.Д., Современные представления об этиологии, патофизиологии и лечении функционального запора // Клинические перспективы гастроэнтерологии, гепатологиию. — 2003. № 2. — С. 24—30.
  2. Шульпенкова Ю.О., Ивашкин В.Т. Патогенез и лечение запоров// РМЖ. — 2004. — Т. 6. — № 1. — С. 3—7.
  3. Bartolo D., Roe A. Obstructed defaecation // Br. J. Hosp. Med. — 1986. — Vol. 35(4). — P. 228—36.
  4. Wexner S.D., Duthie G.S., Bartolo D.C.C. Constipation: Etiology, Evaluation and Management. Springer, 2010. — 256 p.
  5. Thompson J.R., et al. Incidence of occult rectal prolapse in patients with clinical recto-celes and defecatory dysfunction //Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2002. Vol. 187(6). — P. 1494—99;discussion 1499—500.
  6. Bove A., et al. Consensus statement AIGO/ SICCR diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation and obstructed defecation (part II: treatment)// World J. Gastroenterol. — 2012. — Vol. 18(36). — P. 4994—5013.
  7. Bove A., et al. Consensus statement AIGO/ SICCR: diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation and obstructed defecation (part I: diagnosis) // World J. Gastroenterol. — 2012. — Vol. 18(14). — P. 1555—64.
  8. Talley N.J., et al. Functional constipation and outlet delay: a population-based study // Gastroenterology. — 1993. — Vol. 105(3). — P. 781-90.
  9. Wexner S.D., Zbar A.P., Pescatori M. Complex anorectal disorders: investigation and management. Springer, 2005.
  10. Davila G.W., Ghoniem G.M., Wexner S.D. Pelvic floor dysfunction: a multidisciplinary approach. Springer, 2006.
  11. Khaikin M., Wexner S.D. Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence // World J. Gastroenterol. — 2006. — Vol. 12(20). — P. 3168—73.
  12. Boccasanta P., et al. Which surgical approach for rectocele? A multicentric report from Italian coloproctologists // Tech. Coloproctol. — 2001. — Vol. 5(3). — P. 149—56.
  13. Деринов А.А, и др. Тактика обследования и лечения женщин с дисценцией тазового дна в колопроктологической практике / Материалы всероссийского форума «Пироговская хирургическая неделя». — 2010. — С. 381—82.
  14. Chen H.H., et al. Associations of defecography and physiologic findings in male patients with rectocele // Tech. Coloproctol. — 2001. — Vol. 5(3). — P. 157—61.
  15. van Raalte H.M., et al. One-year anatomic and quality-of-life outcomes after the Prolift procedure for treatment of posthysterectomy prolapse //Am. J.Obstet. Gynecol. — 2008. — Vol. 199(6). — P. 694.
  16. Коршунов М.Ю., Сазыкина Е.И. Опросник ПД-КЖ - валидированный способ оценки симптомов дисфункций тазового дна и качества жизни у пациенток с пролапсом тазовых органов // Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. — 2008. — Т. 57. — № 3. — С. 86—93.
  17. Uebersax J.S., et al. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group // Neurourol. Urodyn. — 1995. — Vol. 14(2). — P. 131—39.
  18. Longstreth G.F., et al. Functional bowel disorders // Gastroenterology. — 2006. — Vol. 130(5). — P. 1480—91.
  19. Porter N.H. A physiological study of the pelvic floor in rectal prolapse // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. — 1962. — Vol. 31. — P. 379—404.
  20. Yip B., et al. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing: assessing the educational learning curve: can we teach our own? // Dis. Colon. Rectum. — 2002. — Vol. 45(2). — P. 184—87.
  21. Thomas C., et al. Respective value of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and anal sphincter electromyography in neurogenic fecal incontinence // Neurophysiol. Clin. — 2002. — Vol. 32(1). — P. 85—90.
  22. Periut P.I., Salanga V.D. Sphincter Disturbances, in Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences, J.A. Michael and B.D. Robert, Editors. Academic Press, New York, 2003. — P. 338—39.
  23. Орлова Л.П. и др. Особенности лучевой диагностики ректоцеле // Медицинская визуализация. — 2006. — № 1. — С. 98—102.
  24. Зароднюк И.В. Рентгенологическая дефекография в обследовании колопроктологических больных // Радиология-практика. — 2004. — № 2. — С. 26—30.
  25. Regadas F.S., et al. Prospective multicenter trial comparing echodefecography with defecography in the assessment of anorectal dysfunction in patients with obstructed defecation // Dis. Colon.Rectum. — 2011. — Vol. 54(6). — P. 686— 92.
  26. Henry M.M., Swash M. Coloproctology and the pelvic floor. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992.
  27. Faccioli N., et al. Defecography: a practical approach // Diagn. Interv. Radiol. — 2010. — Vol. 16(3). — P. 209—16.
  28. Nakano H. Assessment of dystocia pelvis by ultrasound pelvimetry // Acta Obstet. Gynaecol. Jpn. — 1981. — Vol. 33(7). — P. 1077—84.
  29. Pittman J.S., Benson J.T., Sumners J.E. Physiologic evaluation of the anorectum. A new ultrasound technique //Dis. Colon. Rectum. — 1990. — Vol. 33(6). — P. 476—78.
  30. Goodrich M.A., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor relaxation: dynamic analysis and evaluation of patients before and after surgical repair // Obstet. Gynecol. 1993. — Vol. 82(6). — P. 883—91.
  31. Волобуев А.И. и др. Руководство по лучевой диагностике в гинекологии. СПб., 2008.
  32. Emmanuel A. Current management strategies and therapeutic targets in chronic constipation // Therap. Adv. Gastroenterol. — 2011. — Vol. 4(1). — P. 37—48.
  33. Sikirov D. Comparison of straining during defecation in three positions: results and implications for human health // Dig. Dis. Sci. — 2003. — Vol. 48(7). — P. 1201—205.
  34. Tack J. Current and future therapies for chronic constipation // Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. — 2011. — 25(1). — P. 151—58.
  35. Кольченко И.И. Оптимизация лечения функционального запора на основе критериев прогноза. Дисс. канд. мед. наук, 2002.
  36. Hubel K.A. Editorial. Voluntary control of gastrointestinal function: operant conditioning and biofeedback// Gastroenterology. — 1974. — Vol. 66(5). — P. 1085—88.
  37. Rao S.S. Biofeedback therapy for constipation in adults// Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. — 2011. — Vol. 25(1). — P. 159—66.
  38. Engel B.T., Nikoomanesh P., Schuster M.M. Operant conditioning of rectosphincteric responses in the treatment of fecal incontinence // N. Engl. J. Med. — 1974. — Vol. 290(12). — P. 646—49.
  39. Enck P., Van der Voort I.R., Klosterhalfen S. Biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence and constipation // Neurogastroenterol. Motil. — 2009. — Vol. 21(11). — P. 1133—41.
  40. Norton C., Hosker G., Brazzelli M. Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. — 2000;(2):CD002111.
  41. Norton C. Fecal incontinence and biofeedback therapy // Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am. — 2008. — Vol. 37(3). — P. 587—604.
  42. Дзанаева, Д.Б. и др. К вопросу о выборе метода лечения у больных с ректоцеле и опущением стенок влагалища // Вестник новых медицинских технологий. — 2007. — Т. 14. — № 1. — С. 95—6.
  43. Ferrazzi, S., et al. Diagnosis of constipation in family practice // Can. J. Gastroenterol. — 2002. — Vol. 16(3). — P. 159—64.
  44. Johanson J.F., Kralstein J. Chronic constipation: a survey of the patient perspective // Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. — 2007. — Vol. 25(5). — P. 599—608.
  45. Couturier D. Comparative study of Forlax and Transipeg in the treatment of functional constipation in the adult // Ann. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.(Paris). — 1996. — Vol. 32(3). — P. 135—40.
  46. Carlin A, Justham D. A literature review of two laxatives: lactulose and polyethylene glycol — Br. J. Community Nurs. — 2011. — Vol. 16(12). — P. 584, 586, 588—90.
  47. Lee-Robichaud H., et al. Lactulose versus Polyethylene Glycol for Chronic Constipation // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. — 2010;(7):CD007570.
  48. Denis P., Lerebours E. Study of the longterm tolerance of Forlax® in 16 patients treated for an average of 17 months for chronic constipation // Medecine & Chirurgie Digestives. — 1996. — Vol. 25(5). — P. 7-16.
  49. Pare P. The approach to diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation: suggestions for a general practitioner// Can. J. Gastroenterol. — 2011. — Vol. 25(Suppl. B). — 36B-40B.
  50. Ford A.C., Suares N.C. Effect of laxatives and pharmacological therapies in chronic idiopathic constipation: systematic review and metaanalysis // Gut. — 2011. — Vol. 60(2). — P. 209—18.
  51. Liu L.W. Chronic constipation: current treatment options// Can. J. Gastroenterol. — 2011. — Vol. 25 (Suppl. B). — 22B-8B.
  52. Muller-Lissner S., et al. Levels of satisfaction with current chronic constipation treatment options in Europe - an internet survey // Aliment Pharmacol.Ther — 2013. — Vol. 37(1). — P. 137—45.
  53. Деринов А.А. Особенности обследования и хирургической коррекции заднего пролапса тазового дна у женщин. Дисс. канд. мед. наук, 2012.
  54. Belsey J.D., Geraint M., Dixon T.A. Systematic review and meta-analysis: polyethylene glycol in adults with non-organic constipation // Int. J. Clin. Pract. — 2010. — 64(7). — P. 944—55.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies