MODERN POSSIBILITIES OF ROBOTIC TECHNOLOGIES: EXPERIENCE OF DEPARTMENT OF UROLOGY MSMSU


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Significant technological breakthrough and progressive modernization of minimally invasive treatments have led to the fact that the robotic technology occupy a leading position in medicine. Widespread use of robotic surgical systems is caused not only by high technological effectiveness, but also the tendency of transition to organ-sparing surgery. Robotic technology has all benefits of minimally invasive procedures in respect of such parameters as the degree of blood loss, transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, and others; they are far superior to laparoscopic techniques used, and the results of surgical interventions are better than those of open surgery. Thousands of successful robotic operations around the world show a wide introduction of robotic technology in almost all branches of medicine. In this article, we describe our own experience of use of daVinci robotic surgical system.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. O Vasiliev

SBEI HPE MSMSU n.a. A.I. Evdokimov of RMPH

Email: alexvasilyev@me.com
Senior Assistant at the Department of Urology

A. V Govorov

SBEI HPE MSMSU n.a. A.I. Evdokimov of RMPH

Department of Urology

V. V Dyakov

SBEI HPE MSMSU n.a. A.I. Evdokimov of RMPH

Department of Urology

P. L Rasner

SBEI HPE MSMSU n.a. A.I. Evdokimov of RMPH

Department of Urology

K. B Kolontarev

SBEI HPE MSMSU n.a. A.I. Evdokimov of RMPH

Department of Urology

E. G Maltsev

SBEI HPE MSMSU n.a. A.I. Evdokimov of RMPH

Department of Urology

D. Yu Pushkar

SBEI HPE MSMSU n.a. A.I. Evdokimov of RMPH

Department of Urology

References

  1. Buckingham R.A., Buckingham R.O. Robots in operating theatres. BMJ. 1995:311:1479-82.
  2. Cadeddu J.A., Stoianovici D., Kavoussi L.R. Telepresence and robotics: urology in the 21st century. Contemp Urol. 1997: 9( 10):86-97.
  3. Challacombe B.J., Khan M.S., Murphy D., Dasgupta P. The history of robotics in urology. World 1. Urol. 2006:24(2):20-7.
  4. Satava R.M. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc Percutan. Tech. 2002:12(1):6-16.
  5. Marescaux J., Leroy J., Gagner M., Rubino F., Mutter D., Vix M., et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature. 2001: 413:379-80.
  6. Murphy D., Challacombe B., Khan M.S, Dasgupta P. Robotic technology in urology. Postgrad. Med.J. 2006:82(973):743-47.
  7. Intuitive Surgical®, Annual Report// Inc., 2014: http://investor.intuitivesurgical.com/phoenix. zhtml?c= 122359&p=irol-news&nyo= 1
  8. Babbar Р., Hemal А.К. Robot-assisted urologic surgery in 2010 - Advancements and future outlook. Urol. Ann. 2011:3(1):1-7.
  9. Говоров A.B., Васильев A.O., Прилепская E.A., Колонтарев К.Б., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Сальважная робот-ассистированная радикальная простатэктомия после брахитерапии: наш опыт. Онкоурология. 2014:3:64-8.
  10. Васильев А.О., Говоров А.В., Дьяков В.В., Ковылина М.В., Прилепская Е.А., Колонта- рев КБ., Пушкарь Д.Ю., Давыдова Е.С. Робот-ассистированная лапароскопическая дивертикулэктомия: наш первый опыт. Эксперим. и клин, урология. 2014;2:44-7.
  11. Распер П.И., Гвоздев М.Ю., Рева И.А., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Робот-ассистированная коррекция ятрогенной травмы тазового отдела мочеточника. Эндохирургия сегодня. 2014;5:3-9.
  12. Колонтарев К.Б., Пушкарь Д.Ю., Раснер П.И., Рева И.А. Роботический уретероцисто- неоанастомоз при травмах мочеточника. Опыт четырех случаев. Медицинский совет. 2014;19:46-50.
  13. Раснер П.И., Гвоздев М.Ю., Рева И.А., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Робот-ассистированная сакрокольпопексия. Клинический случай. Эндохирургия сегодня. 2014:5:10-5.
  14. Говоров А.В., Васильев А.О., Колонтарев КБ., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Роботизированные технологии в урологии. Consilium medicum. 2014;7:5-7.
  15. Bivalacqua T.J., Pierorazio P.M., Su L.M. Open, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: optimizing the surgical approach. Surg. Oncol. 2009;18(3):233-41.
  16. Parsons J.K, Bennett J.L. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology. 2008;72(2):412-16.
  17. Nelson B., Kaufman M., Broughton G., Cookson M.S., Chang S.S., Herrell S.D., Baumgartner R.G., Smith J.A. Ir. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2007;177(3):929-31.
  18. Tewari A., Menon M. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy: surgical technique and current results. Curr. Urol. Rep. 2003;4(2):119-23.
  19. Webster T.M., Herrell S.D., Chang S.S., Cookson M.S., Baumgartner R.G., Anderson L.W., Smith J.A. Jr. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain. J. Urol. 2005; 174(3):912-14.
  20. Ғісагга V., Novara G., Artibani W., Cestari A., Galfano A., Graefen M., Guazzoni G., Guillonneau B., Menon M., Montorsi F., Patel V., Rassweiler J., Van Poppet H. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Fur. Urol. 2009;55(5):1037-63.
  21. Murphy D.G., Challacombe BJ., Costello A.J. Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Asian J. Androl. 2009;11(1 У.94-9.
  22. Wilson T., Toney R. Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better? Curr. Opin. Urol. 2011;21(3):200-5.
  23. Malcolm J.B., Fabrizio M.D., Barone B.B., Given R.W., Lance R.S., Lynch D.F., Davis J.W., Shaves M.E., Schellhammer P.F. Quality of life after open or robotic prostatectomy, cryoab- lation or brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. J. Urol. 2010;183:1822-28.
  24. http://vestnik.rncrr.ru/vestnik/v11/papers/ katib_v11.htm

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2016 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies