Neurorehabilitation predicated on the principles of evidence-based medicine: Austrian recommendations for the rehabilitation of post-stroke patients


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Modern neurorehabilitation, based on the principles of evidence-based medicine, makes us move away from the GRADE-concept (model of successive rehabilitation). There were grounds for the beginning of rehabilitation in the emergency room in the first 24-48 hours. Proper organization of the stroke compartment reduces mortality and disability. Prerequisites are the presence of a rehabilitation team (level A), whose members are: a neurologist, a physiotherapist, an ergotherapist, a speech therapist, as well as a psychologist and a social worker; regular consultations with leading neurologists and other doctors to determine and document the therapy, its dynamics; cognitive screening; discussion of the results of the examination and treatment plan with relatives. Rehabilitation activities are based on the use of the International Classification of Functioning, Vital Activity and Health (ICF) and are performed at structural and functional levels (for example, muscle strength, tone, breathing), differ in goals, types of activity, patient participation and should be easily measured and painted time, to enable the patient to be motivated, as well as to be relevant to his condition (level A). On the other hand, the rehabilitation assessment at the early stages may also have predictive value (the Bartel index is within 5 days), based on the use of standard scales. The use of various therapeutic techniques that have a level of evidence of IA-III is performed in various combinations in each individual patient, depending on the existing pathological syndromes. There is evidence of the positive effects of levodopa and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (class II - III, level B - C), as well as specific peptide complexes - Cerebrolysin at a dose of 30 ml in a course of 3 weeks or more (class II, level B). Rehabilitation in the long term can be carried out at home, even a year after a stroke, balance exercises, gait training using different methods, training for the upper limbs are effective (grade B) and contribute to the reduction of disability.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yulia V. Bushkova

Research Institute of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

PhD, Senior Reseracher, Physical Therapy Physician

References

  1. United Nations Organisation. https://www.un.org/ development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/artide-26-habiiitation-and- rehabiiitation.htmi. 201
  2. Neuhaus A.A., Couch Y., Hadiey G., Buchan A.M. Neuroprotection in stroke: the importance of collaboration and reproducibility. Brain 2017;140(8):2079-92.
  3. Cramer S.C., Sur M., Dobkin B.H., et al. Harnessing neuropiasticity for clinical applications. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 6):1591-609.
  4. World Stroke Campaign. http://www. worldstrokecampaign.org/images/global_stroke_ bill_of_rights/English_GlobalBO-Rights_web.pdf (zuletzt abgerufen 16.3.2018) 2018.
  5. Wein T., Lindsay M.P., Cote R., et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Secondary prevention of stroke, sixth edition practice guidelines, update 2017. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(4):420-43.
  6. Pollock A., Baer G., Campbell P., et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(4):CD001920.
  7. World Health Organisation. http://www.who. int/classifications/icf/en/ (zuletzt abgerufen 16.3.2018) 2018.
  8. AVERT Trial Collaboration Group. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(9988):46-55.
  9. Janssen H., Ada L., Bernhardt J., et al. An enriched environment increases activity in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation in a mixed rehabilitation unit: a pilot non-randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(3):255-62.
  10. Gu S.C., Wang C.D. Early Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Recovery after Stroke: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(5):1178-89.
  11. Bornstein N.M., Guekht A., Vester J., et al. Safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in early post-stroke recovery: a meta-analysis of nine randomized clinical trials. Neurol Sci. 2018;39(4): 629-40.
  12. Muresanu D.F., Heiss W.D., Hoemberg V., et al. Cerebrolysin and recovery after stroke (CARS): a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial. Stroke. 2016;47:151-59.
  13. Guekht A., Vester J., Heiss W.D., et al.Safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in motor function recovery after stroke: a meta-analysis of the CARS trials. Neurol Sci. 2017;38:1761-69.
  14. Scheidtmann K., Fries W., Muller F., Koenig E. Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study. Lancet 2001;358(9284):787-90.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies