Back pain: selection of therapy in terms of effectiveness and safety


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Despite the seeming triviality, the task of diagnosing and treating back pain is far from simple: first, it is required to identify the cause of the pain, which does not always lie on the surface, and to exclude a number of conditions that pose a threat to the patient’s health and life; secondly, it is necessary to find an effective treatment. The problem of treating patients with back pain is the frequent chronicity of pain syndrome, which sharply worsens the prognosis of recovery. Timely relief of acute pain and adequate selection of pain relievers can resolve this issue in more than half of patients. The appointment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which is necessary for acute dorsalgia and is often required in cases of chronic pain, should be carried out taking into account not only the effectiveness, but also the safety of using these drugs individually for each patient. Most elderly patients with concomitant somatic pathology have an average or high risk of developing undesirable side effects with NSAIDs. Among all NSAIDs, coxibs are considered the most selective in terms of their effect on cyclooxygenase-2 and the least toxic in terms of their effect on the gastrointestinal tract. In particular, etoricoxib proved to be an effective drug for the relief of acute and chronic pain, according to international studies and meta-analysis, the risk of negative effects of etoricoxib on the gastrointestinal tract is lower than that of diclofenac and is comparable to the latter in terms of cardiovascular complications. Nevertheless, it is not recommended to use any NSAIDs for a long time, and the selection of the drug should be carried out individually, taking into account the existing concomitant diseases.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

A. Pilipovich

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: aapilipovich@mail.ru
Department of Neurology Diseases

A. Danilov

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Department of Neurology Diseases

参考

  1. Cohen S.P, Chen Y, Neufeld N.J. Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother 2013;13(1):99-116. Doi: 10.1586/ ern.12.148.
  2. Koes B.W, van Tulder M.W, Thomas S. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain BMJ. 2006;332:1430-34. Doi: 10.1136/ bmj.332.7555.1430.
  3. Lewis J, O'Sullivan P. Is it time to re frame how we care for people with non-traumaticmusculoskeletal pain? BrJ Sports Med. 2018;52(24):1543-44. Do:: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099198.
  4. Данилов А.Б. Нейропатическая боль. Избранные лекции по неврологии. Под ред. Голубева В.Л. 2006. С. 203-223. [Danilov A.B. Neuropathic pain. Selected Lectures on Neurology. Ed. by V.L. Golubev. 2006. P 203-23. (In Russ.)].
  5. Coste J, Delecoeuillerie G, Cohen de Lara A, et al. Acute low back pain clinical course and prognostic factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(10):840-45. Dor. 10.1080/09638280802355163.
  6. Thomas E, Silman A.J., Croft P.R, et al. Predicting persistent disabling low back pain in general practice: prospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(526):334-41.
  7. Tsuji T, Matsudaira K, Sato H, Vietri J. The impact of depression among chronic low back pain patients in Japan. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorder. 2016;17(1):447. Doi: 10.1186/s 12891-01613044.
  8. Namgwa K.J., Terkura A., William Y, et al. Depression in patients with chronic low back pain: a hospital based study. Niger J Surg Res.2016;17:1-4. doi: 10.4103/err.err_32_18.
  9. Sagheer M.A, Khan M.F, Sharif S. Association between chronic low back pain anxiety and depression in patients at a tertiary care centre. J Pak MedAssoc.2013; 63: 688-90.
  10. Deardorff W.W. Depression and chronic back pain. [October 14,2016]. Available from: https:// www.spine-health.com/conditions/depression/ depression-and-chronic-back-pain
  11. Пилипович А.А. Боль в спине: подбор терапии с точки зрения безопасности и эффективности. Consilium Medicum. 2017; 2.3:56-62. doi: 10.26442/2075-1753_19.2.3.56-62. [Pilipovich A.A. Back pain: selection of therapy in terms of safety and effectiveness. Consilium Medicum. 2017;2.3:56-62. Doi: 10.26442/ 2075-1753_19.2.3.56-62. (In Russ.)].
  12. Тру хан Д.И. Выбор анальгетика при боли в спине сквозь призму лекарственной безопасности и коморбидности: в фокусе флупиртин. Consilium Medicum. 2017;9:22-9. doi: 10.26442/2075-1753_19.9.80-87. [Trukhan D.I. Analgesic choice for back pain through the prism of drug safety and comorbidity: flupirtine in focus. Consilium Medicum. 2017;9:22-9. doi: 10.26442/2075-1753_19.9.80-87. (In Russ.)].
  13. Walker C. Are All Oral COX-2 Selective Inhibitors the Same? A Consideration of Celecoxib, Etoricoxib, and Diclofenac Int J Rheumatol. 2018;2018:1302835. doi: 10.1155/2018/1302835.
  14. Schmidt M, Lamberts M., Olsen A. S., et al. Cardiovascular safety of non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: review and position paper by the working group for Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy of the European Society of Cardiology. European HeartJournal-Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy. 2016;2(2):108-18. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvv054.
  15. Tilo Grosser et al. Biological basis for the cardiovascular consequences of COX-2 inhibition: therapeutic challenges and opportunities. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:4-15. Doi: 10.1172/ JCI27291.
  16. Bhala N., Emberson J., Merhi A. Vascular and upper gastrointestinal effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: meta-analyses of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2013;382(9894):769-79. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60900-9.
  17. European Medicines Agency. Diclofenac-containing medicines. 2013, Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/ human/referrals/diclofenac-containing-medicines
  18. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Diclofenac tablets now only available as a prescription medicine. 2015, Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ diclofenac-tablets-now-only-available-as-a-prescription-medicine
  19. Warner T.D., Giuliano F., Vojnovic I., et al. Nonsteroid drug selectivities for cyclo-oxygenase-1 rather than cyclo-oxygenase-2 are associated with human gastrointestinal toxicity: a full in vitro analysis. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999;96(13):7563-68. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7563.
  20. Tacconelli S., Capone M. L., Sciulli M.G., et al. The biochemical selectivity of novel COX-2 inhibitors in whole blood assays of COX-isozyme activity. Curr Med Res Opin. 2002;18(8):503-11. doi: 10.1185/030079902125001335.
  21. Malmstrom K., Sarpe A., Coughlin H., et al. Etoricoxib in acute pain associated with dental surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-and active comparator-controlled dose-ranging study Clin Ther. 2004;26(5):667-79. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90067-7.
  22. Combe B., Swergold G., McLay J., et al. Cardiovascular safety and gastrointestinal tolerability of etoricoxib vs diclofenac in a randomized controlled clinical trial (The MEDAL study). Rheumatology. 2009;48(4):425-32. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep005.
  23. Zacher J., Feldman D, Gerly R, et al. A comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of etoricoxib and diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(8):725-36. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002469.
  24. Wiesenhutter C, Boice J., Ko A, et al. Evaluation of the comparative efficacy of etoricoxib and ibuprofen for treatment of patients with osteoarthritis: A randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(4):470-79. doi: 10.4065/80.4.470.
  25. Ray W.A, Stein C.M., Hall K, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of serious coronary heart disease: an observational cohort study Lancet. 2002;359(9301):118-23. Dor. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07370-1.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
##common.cookie##