Dynamics of the bioelectric activity of the cerebral cortex after a stroke with imagining the movement of the ipsilesional hand


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. In patients with post-stroke spastic hemiparesis, daily activities and self-care are largely determined by the function of the non-paretic hand. Although it is known that there is a motor deficit in a “healthy" hand, rehabilitation programs, however, are mainly aimed at the paretic hand. Currently, there are practically no approaches to the rehabilitation of the motor functions of the ipsilesional hand, so this aspect needs to be carefully studied. Objective. Evaluation of the bioelectric activity in the cerebral cortex in patients with post-stroke paresis of the upper limb before and after a course of rehabilitation exercises with intact hand movement imagination (MI) and using the brain-computer interface+hand exoskeleton (BCIE) in comparison with healthy subjects. Methods. We examined 5 right-handed patients (age - 61.1±0.5 years) with post-stroke hemiparesis, the period from the onset of the disease - 0.4±0.3 years, with a decrease in muscle strength 2-3 points according to the 6-point scale. The control group consisted of 5 healthy individuals of a similar age. BCIE was used for rehabilitation, 10 daily sessions were carried out. The EEG study was carried out on day 0, before the start of rehabilitation procedures, and on the day 30, 2 weeks after the end of the rehabilitation course. The power of EEG rhythms in a ten-second series of consecutive one-second epochs was analyzed. Results. In patients with right-sided hemiparesis, during the MI in the intact “healthy" hand, changes in the power of the mu- and alpharhythm were revealed compared to the results of examination of healthy ones - there was a “delay" in its decrease before the course of rehabilitation, and after course of rehabilitation, there was variable power loss during 1st second in both central and, similarly, in the posterior frontal leads. Thus, after BCIE sessions with MI in an ipsilesional «healthy» hand, altered bioelectrical phenomena, but similar to those occurring in healthy individuals, were found. Conclusion. The data obtained demonstrate the need not only for paretic hand exercises and bimanual training, but also for “healthy" hand exercises in the process of rehabilitation of patients with pyramidal hemiparesis, and also confirm the effectiveness of rehabilitation using BCIE.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Sergey V. Kotov

M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

Email: kotovsv@yandex.ru
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Neurology, Faculty of Advanced Training of Physicians Moscow, Russia

E. V Biryukova

Pirogov Medical University

Moscow, Russia

A. A Kondur

M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

Moscow, Russia

E. V Isakova

M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

Moscow, Russia

E. V Slyunkova

M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Sainburg R.L., Maenza C., Winstein C., Good D. Motor Lateralization Provides a Foundation for Predicting and Treating Non-paretic Arm Motor Deficits in Stroke. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;957:257-72. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_14.
  2. Pandian S., Arya K.N., Kumar D. Effect of motor training involving the less-affected side (MTLA) in post-stroke subjects: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015;22(5):357-67. doi: 10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000022.
  3. Neuper C, Scherer R, Reiner M, Pfurtscheller G. Imagery of motor actions: differential effects of kinesthetic and visual-motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005;25(3):668-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.014.
  4. Remsik A., Young B., Vermilyea R., et al. A review of the progression and future implications of brain-computer interface therapies for restoration of distal upper extremity motor function after stroke. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016;13(5):445-54. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1174572.
  5. Monge-Pereira E., Ibanez-Pereda J., Alguacil-Diego I.M., et al. Use of Electroencephalography Brain-Computer Interface Systems as a Rehabilitative Approach for Upper Limb Function After a Stroke: A Systematic Review. PM R. 2017;9(9):918-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.04.016.
  6. Cervera M.A., Soekadar S.R., Ushiba J., et al. Brain-computer interfaces for post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a meta-analysis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018;5(5):651-63. doi: 10.1002/acn3.544.
  7. Frolov A.A., Mokienko O., Lyukmanov R. et al. Post-stroke Rehabilitation Training with a Motor-Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-Controlled Hand Exoskeleton: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:400. Doi: 10.3389/ fnins.2017.00400.
  8. Зенков Л.Р. Клиническая эпилептология (с элементами нейрофизиологии). Руководство для врачей. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: МИА, 2010. 405 c
  9. Мухин К.Ю., Петрухин А.С., Глухова Л.Ю. Эпилепсия. Атлас электро-клинической диагностики. М.: Альварес Паблишинг, 2004. 439 c
  10. Asadi-Pooya A.A., Dlugos D., Skidmore C., Sperling M.R. Atlas of Electroencephalography, 3rd Edition. Epileptic Disord. 2017;19(3):384. Doi: 10.1684/ epd.2017.0934.
  11. Gazzaniga M.S. The split brain revisited. Sci Am. 1998;279(1):50-55. Doi: 10.1038/ scientificamerican0798-50.
  12. Vallortigara G. The evolutionary psychology of left and right: costs and benefits of lateralization. Dev Psychobiol. 2006; 48 (6): 418-427.
  13. MacNeilage P.F., Rogers L.J., Vallortigara G. Origins of the left & right brain. Sci Am. 2009;301(1):60-67. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0709-60.
  14. Sainburg R.L., Duff S.V. Does motor lateralization have implications for stroke rehabilitation? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(3):311-22. Doi: 10.1682/ jrrd.2005.01.0013.
  15. Bisazza A., Rogers L.J., Vallortigara G. The origins of cerebral asymmetry: a review of evidence of behavioural and brain lateralization in fishes, reptiles and amphibians. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998;22(3):411-doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(97)00050-x.
  16. Schaefer S.Y., Haaland K.Y., Sainburg R.L. Dissociation of initial trajectory and final position errors during visuomotor adaptation following unilateral stroke. Brain Res. 2009;1298:78-91. Doi: 10.1016/j. brainres.2009.08.063.
  17. Mutha P.K., Stapp L.H., Sainburg R.L., Haaland K.Y. Frontal and parietal cortex contributions to action modification. Cortex. 2014;57:38-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.03.005.
  18. Prabhakaran S., Zarahn E., Riley C., et al. Interindividual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(1):64-71.
  19. Klimesch W. Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012;16(12): 606-17. Doi: 10.1016/j. tics.2012.10.007.
  20. Frolov A.A., Bobrov P.D., Biryukova E.V., et al. Electrical, hemodynamic and motor activities in post-stroke rehabilitation provided by the hand exoskeleton under control of brain-computer interface: clinical case study. Front Neurol. 2018;9:1135. doi: 10.3389/ fneur.2018.01135.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies