Rational pharmacotherapy of acromegaly: focus on treatment adherence


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Acromegaly is a syndrome that combines various histological subtypes of somatotrophic adenomas, which differ in their pathologic structure, clinical course, and sensitivity to drugs. Therefore, the effectiveness of the treatment manual depends on the timely implementation of tumor-oriented diagnostics with the clarification of the clinical, morphological and phenotypic features of somatotrophic tumors. Objective. A retrospective analysis of the results of long-term drug therapy, taking into account the selective sensitivity to somatostatin analogues of the 1st generation (SA1) among patients with acromegaly included in the Moscow registry, with the identification of possible predictors of an effective drug benefit. Methods. The paper presents the results of 545 patients (162 men, 383 woman) receiving long-term primary or secondary drug therapy SA1. Results. According to the gradient of decrease in the level of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) after 3 months from the start of treatment, it was possible to distinguish groups of patients that differ in clinical, morphological features, the nature of receptor expression and the effectiveness of therapeutic measures. The cut-off points proposed by the authors at 3 and 12 months from the start of treatment can be used to decide whether to maintain or change the treatment tactics. A complete lack of sensitivity to SA1, detected by an evaluation test or the results of short-term treatment (3-12 months), may be a sign of the presence of a high-risk tumor that requires the use of radical methods of treatment. Conclusion. Based on the clinical picture of the disease, age-sex and morphological features, as well as the results of short-term therapeutic use of SA1, it is possible not only to predict the effectiveness of further medical treatment, but also to presumably judge the pathohistological subtype of a somatotrophic tumor. Patients ‘ adherence to treatment depends on the effectiveness of the treatment, the availability of the drug, the minimization of side effects, the tolerability and low injury rate of injections.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Vyacheslav S. Pronin

Endocrinological Dispensary of Moscow Health Care Department

Email: vspronin@yandex.ru
7 2-nd Botkinsky proezd, Moscow 125284, Russian Federation

M. B Antsiferov

Endocrinological Dispensary of Moscow Health Care Department

Moscow, Russia

T. M Alekseeva

Endocrinological Dispensary of Moscow Health Care Department

Moscow, Russia

V. S Pronin

Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education

Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Lopes M.B.S. The 2017 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the pituitary gland: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2017;134(4):521-35. doi: 10.1007/s00401-017-1769-8.
  2. Mete O., Korbonits M., Trouillas J., Yamada S. WHO Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organs. Somatotroph adenoma; FI 19-23. Chapter 1: Tumors of the Pituitary Gland. WHO; Lyon, France, 2017.
  3. Trouillas J., Jaffrain-Rea M.-L., Vasiljevic A., et al. How to Classify Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors (PitNet)s in 2020. Cancer (Basel). 2020;12(2):514. doi: 10.3390/cancers12020514.
  4. Shaid M., Korbonits M. Genetics of pituitary adenomas. Neurol India. 2017;65:577-87. doi: 10.4103/neuroindia.NI_330_17.
  5. Chinezu L., Vasiljevic A., Jouanneau E., et al. Expression of somatostatin receptors, SSTR2A and SSTR5, in 108 endocrine pituitary tumors using immunohistochemical detection with new specific monoclonal antibodies. Hum Pathol. 2014;45:71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.08.007.
  6. Casar-Borota O., Heck A., Schulz S., et al. Expression of SSTR2a, but not of SSTRs 1, 3, or 5 in somatotroph adenomas assessed by monoclonal antibodies was reduced by octreotide and correlated with the acute and long-term effects of octreotide. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:E1730-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2145.
  7. Akirov A., Asa S.L., Amer L., Shimon I, Ezzat S. The Clinicopathological Spectrum of Acromegaly J Clin Med. 2019;8(11):1962. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111962.
  8. Vasiljevic A., Jouanneau E., Trouillas J., Raverot G. Clinicopathological prognostic and theranostic markers in pituitary tumors. Minerva Endocrinol. 2016;41:377-89.
  9. Asa S.L., Casar-Borota O., Chanson P., et al. From pituitary adenoma to pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET): An International Pituitary Pathology Club proposal. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2017;24:C5-C8. doi: 10.1530/ERC-17-0004.
  10. Petersen S. Management of Aggressive Pituitary Tumors - A 2019 Update. Horm. Metab. Res. 2019;51(12):755-64. doi: 10.1055/a-1060-1883.
  11. Tortora F., Negro A., Grasso L.F.S., et al. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging predictive role in the therapeutic response of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. Gland Surg. 2019;8(Suppl. 3):S150-58. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.06.04.
  12. Villa C., Vasiljevic A., Jaffrain-Rea M.L., et al. A standartised diagnostic approach to pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs): A European Pituitary Pathology Group (EPPG) proposal. Virchows Arch. 2019;475:687-92. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02655-0.
  13. Öberg K., Lamberts S.W. Somatostatin analogues in acromegaly and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: past, present and future. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2016;23(12):R551-R66. doi: 10.1530/ERC-16-0151.
  14. Maffezzoni F., Formenti A.M., Mazziotti G., et al. Current and future medical treatments for patients with acromegaly. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17(12):1631-42. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1199687.
  15. Petersenn S., Buchfelder M., Gerbert B., et al. Age and Sex as Predictors of Biochemical Activity in Acromegaly: analysis of 1485 Patients From the German Acromegaly Register. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009;71(3):400-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03547.x.
  16. Caron P.J., Bevan J.S., Petersenn S., et al. Tumor Shrinkage With Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg as Primary Therapy in Acromegaly: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(4):1282-90. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3318.
  17. Tulipano G., Bonfanti C., Milani G., et al. Differential inhibition of growth hormone secretion by analogs selective for somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5 in human growth-hormone-secreting adenoma cells in vitro. Neuroendocrinol. 2001,73(5):344-51. doi: 10.1159/000054651.
  18. Paragliola R.M., Corsello S.M., Salvatori R. Somatostatin receptor ligands in acromegaly: clinical response and factors predicting resistance. Pituitary. 2017;20(1):109-15. doi: 10.1007/s11102-016-0768-4.
  19. Pisarek H., Pawlikowski M., Kunert-Radek J., Radek M. Expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes in human pituitary adenomas - immunohistochemical studies. Endocrinol Pol. 2009;60(4):240-51.
  20. Gomez-Hernandez K., Ezzat S., Asa S.L., Mete O. Clinical Implications of Accurate Subtyping of Pituitary Adenomas: Perspectives from the Treating Physician. Turk Patol Derg.2015;31(Suppl. 1):4-17. doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2015.01311.
  21. Corica G., Ceraudo M., Campana C., et al. Octreotide-Resistant Acromegaly: Challenges and Solutions. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020;16:379-91. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S183360.
  22. Анциферов М.Б., Пронин В.С. Использование клинико-лабораторных предикторов в прогнозировании антисекреторного и антипролиферативного действия аналогов соматостатина при лечении акромегалии: обзор последних исследований. Фарматека. 2015;5:53-60.
  23. Colao A., Pivonello R., Auriemma R.S., et al. Growth hormone-secreting tumor shrinkage after 3 months of octreotide-long-acting release therapy predicts the response at 12 months. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(9):3436-42. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0424.
  24. Mercado M., Borges F., Bouterfa H., et al. A prospective, multicentre study to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of octreotide LAR (long-acting repeatable octreotide) in the primary therapy of patients with acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;66(6):859-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02825.x.
  25. Liu W., Xie L., He M., et al. Expression of Somatostatin Receptor 2 in Somatotropinoma Correlated with the Short-Term Efficacy of Somatostatin Analogues. Int J Endocrinol. 2017;2017:9606985. doi: 10.1155/2017/9606985.
  26. Caron P.J., Petersenn S., Houchard A., et al. Glucose and lipid levels with lanreotide autogel 120 mg in treatment-naïve patients with acromegaly: data from the PRIMARYS study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017;86(4):541-51. doi: 10.1111/cen.13285.
  27. Caron P.J. Bevan J.S., Petersenn S., et al. Tumor Shrinkage with lanreotide Autogel 120 mg as primary therapy in acromegaly: results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(4):1282-90. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3318.
  28. Salvatory R., Gordon M.B., Woodmansee W.W., et al. A multicenter, observational study of lanreotide depot/autogel (LAN) in patients with acromegaly in the United States: 2-year experience from the SODA registry. Pituitary. 2017;20(6):605-18. doi: 10.1007/s11102-017-0821-y.
  29. Khairi S., Sagvand B.T., Pulaski-Liebert K.J., et al. Clinical outcomes and self-reported symptoms in patients with acromegaly: an 8-year follow-up of a lanreotide study. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(1):56-65. doi: 10.4158/EP161439.OR.
  30. Neggers S.J., Pronin V., Balcere I., et al. Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg at extended dosing intervals in patients with acromegaly biochemically controlled with octreotide LAR: the LEAD study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(3):313-23.
  31. Cella D., Evans J., Feuilly M., et al. Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives of FirstGeneration Somatostatin Analogs in the Management of Neuroendocrine Tumors and Acromegaly: A Systematic Literature Review. Adv Ther 2021;38(2):969-93. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01600-x.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies