Experience of SLIT in patients with bronchial asthma through the prism of the coronavirus infection pandemic


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. The problem of the features of the course of allergic diseases against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as rational and safe approaches to their treatment, are in the focus of close attention of specialists. The article presents the results of the use of sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy (SLIT) in the context of a coronavirus infection pandemic in patients with bronchial asthma (BA). Objective. Assessment of the clinical and immunological efficacy and safety of SLIT in the treatment of BA against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. From 2017 to 2021, a retrospective study of the efficacy and safety of SLIT in comparison with the standard baseline therapy for patients with allergic BA caused by sensitization to the house dust mite was performed. The study included 72 patients with allergic BA, 42 of them received SLIT with Staloral “Tick Allergen" against the background of baseline anti-inflammatory therapy, 30 - only standard baseline anti-inflammatory therapy. Control of asthma symptoms and severity, demand for baseline therapy, the ACT test results, functional test data, allergic-immunological parameters (total IgE, asIgE to D. farinae and D. pteronyssinus allergens, diameter of scarification samples with etiotropic allergens) were assessed in over time. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, namely from 2019 to 2021, the risk of COVID-19 infection was additionally assessed in all patients with BA. In the spring of 2019, patients were followed-up using telemedicine technologies. In the case of coronavirus infection, its severity and outcomes, as well as the effect on the course of BA, were evaluated. Parameters are presented as mean, median (Me) and quartiles [Р25%; P75%]. The results were considered statistically significant at p<0.05. Wilcoxon-test was used for the comparison of groups. Results. At the end of the three-year course of treatment, the clinical efficacy of SLIT with Staloral “Tick Allergen", taking into account the excellent and good results, was 92.8%. After 3 years, SLIT showed a statistically significant (p<0.05) decrease in the frequency of BA symptoms and exacerbations, and improvement of disease control. There was a decrease in the average dose of inhaled glucocortico-steroids by 1.7 times compared with the initial values (p<0.05). The frequency of exacerbations in patients of the first group decreased by 2.1 times, while in patients of the second group - by 1.1 times. In patients receiving SLIT, the BA control increased: the total ACT score decreased against the background of SLIT with Staloral “Tick Allergen" from 1.93 to 1.12 points, in patients of the second group this indicator was 2.1 (p<0.05). As a result of SLIT in BA patients, the total IgE level decreased by 1.8 times, asIgE to the house dust mite D. pteronyssinus - by 3.1 (from 4.21 to 1.37 kU/L), to the D. farinae mite - by 2 (from 5.90 to 2.89 kU/L), the diameter of skin tests - by 1.9 times (from 8.17 to 4.19; p<0.05). Mild local reactions to SLIT were recorded in 19.0% of cases. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, SLIT has been temporarily withheld in 10 patients due to coronavirus infection. All infected patients had a mild clinical course of disease. No hospitalization and no BA exacerbation against the background of a viral infection was recorded. IgG antibodies were detected in 11 patients of both groups before the planned administration of the Sputnik-V vaccine, which indicated that they had an asymptomatic course of the disease. Thus, the results of this study demonstrate the need to use SLIT to optimize the treatment of allergic BA, and also indicate the safety and feasibility of this method in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion. SLIT is a safe, highly effective method of BA immunotherapy, which is possible despite the COVID-19 pandemic. BA patients receiving SLIT as part of baseline therapy are not at risk of developing severe COVID-19, which is associated with good BA control as a result of combined treatment.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ekaterina A. Orlova

Penza Institute for Advanced Medical Education - Branch Campus of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Email: lisaol@yandex.ru
Professor at the Department of Allergology and Immunology Penza, Russia

E. M Kostina

Penza Institute for Advanced Medical Education - Branch Campus of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Penza, Russia

E. Yu Trushina

Penza Institute for Advanced Medical Education - Branch Campus of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Penza, Russia

References

  1. Jutel M., Agache I., Bonini S., et al. Internetional Consensus On (ICON) Allergy Immunotherapy (AIT). J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(3):556-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.04.047.
  2. Cosmi L., Santarlasci V., Angeli R., et al. Sublingual immunotherapy with Dermatophagoides monomeric allergoid down-regulates allergen specific immunoglobulin E and increases both interferon Y and interleukin 10 production. Clin Exp Allergy. 2006;36(3):261-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02429.x
  3. Курбачева О.М., Павлова К.С. Федеральные клинические рекомендации. Аллерген-специфическая иммунотерапия. Российский аллергологический журнал. 2006;4-5:55-61.
  4. Курбачева О.М., Павлова К.С., Галицкая М.А. Аллерген-специфическая иммунотерапия. Аналитический обзор современных международных и отечественных позиционных документов. Российский аллергологический журнал. 2017;(1):24-32
  5. Курбачева О.М., Ненашева Н.М., Новик Г.А. и др. Руководства по АСИТвсвете доказательной медицины. XIV Международный конгресс «Современные проблемы иммунологии, аллергологии и иммунофармакологии». Сателлитный симпозиум компании «Сталлержен». Эффективная фармакотерапия. Аллергология и иммунология. 2017;2(28):32-38
  6. Pitsios C., et al. Contraindications to immunotherapy: a global approach. Clin Transl Allergy. 2019;(9):45. doi: 10.1186/s13601-019-0285-4
  7. Сталораль «Аллерген клещей». Инструкция по медицинскому применению - РУ № ЛСР-008340/10
  8. Баранов А.А., Намазова-Баранова Л.С.,Хаитов Р.М. и др. Согласованные рекомендации по ведению детей с аллергическими болезнями в период пандемии нового коронавируса SARS-CoV-2 (инфекции COVID-19). Педиатрическая фармакология. 2020;17(2):119-22
  9. Орлова Е.А., Костина Е.М., Куликова О.А. Клинический опыт сублингвальной аллергенспецифической иммунотерапии аллергического ринита в условиях пандемии коронавирусной инфекции. Фарматека. 2020;2(10):72-9
  10. Huang C., Wang Y., Li X., et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.
  11. Wu Z., McGoogan J.M. Characteristics of and important lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the chinese center for disease control and prevention. JAMA. 2020. Doi: 10.1001/ jama.2020.2648.
  12. Ludvigsson J.F Systematic review of COVID-19 in children shows milder cases and a better prognosis than adults. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109(6):1088-95. doi: 10.1111/apa.15270.
  13. Jackson D.J., Busse W.W., Bacharier L.B., et al. Association of respiratory allergy, asthma, and expression of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020; 146(1):203-6. Doi: 1016/j. jaci.2020.04.009.
  14. Hoffmann M., Kleine-Weber H., Schroeder S., et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181(2):271-80. Doi: 10.1016/j. cell.2020.02.052.
  15. Leung J.M., Yang C.X., Tam A., et al. ACE-2 expressionin the small airway epithelia of smokers and COPD Patients: Implications for COVID-Eur Respir J. 2020;55(5):2000688. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00688-2020.
  16. Brake S.J., Barnsley K., Lu W., et al. Smoking upregulates angiotensin-converting Enzyme-2 receptor: a potential adhesion site for novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):841. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030841.
  17. COVID-19: GINA Answers to Frequently Asked Questions on asthma management. Glob Initiat Asthma GINA. 2020 [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://ginasthma.org/COVID-19-gina-answers-to-frequentlyasked-questions-on-asthma-management/.
  18. Halpin D.M., Singh D., Hadfield R.M. Inhaled Corticosteroids and COVID-19: a systematic review and clinicalperspective.Eur Respir J.2020;55(5):2001009. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01009-2020.
  19. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. Updated 2020. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://ginasthma. org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GINA-2020-report_20_06_04-1-wms.pdf
  20. Федеральные клинические рекомендации по проведению аллерген-специфической иммунотерапии. М., 2013. 14 с
  21. Canonica G.W., Ansotegui I.J., Pawankar R., et al. A WAO - ARIA - GALEN consensus docu-ment on molecular-based allergy diagnostics. World Allergy Organ J. 2013;6(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1939-45516-17.
  22. Shamji M.H., Kappen J.H., Akdis M. Biomarkers for monitoring clinical efficacy of allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma: an EAACI Position Paper. Allergy. 2017;72(8):1156-73. doi: 10.1111/all.13138.
  23. Halpin D.M.G., Faner R., Sibila O., et al. Do chronic respiratory diseases or their treatment affect the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection? The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine 2020;8(5):436-38. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600 (20) 30167-3.
  24. Liu S., Zhi Y., Ying S. COVID-19 and asthma: reflection during the pandemic. Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology. 2020;59(1):78-88. Doi: 10.1007/ s12016-020-08797-3.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies