Cytogenetic analysis as a factor in the prevention of non-developing pregnancy


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Non-developing pregnancy (NDP) is one of the pressing problems of obstetrics and gynecology. Up to 20% of pregnancies end in spontaneous termination in the form of the NDP, and up to 80% of them result in reproductive losses in the first trimester of pregnancy. It remains relevant to study the qualitative and quantitative indicators of the cytogenetic status of abortions to identify not only the cause of NDP in a specific clinical case, but also the patterns of chromosomal mutagenesis in the population and assess its contribution to the development of reproductive losses in the population. Objective. Analysis of the results of a cytogenetic study of the abortive material of residents of Moscow and the Moscow region with non-develping pregnancies (NB) for the period from 2017 to 2021. Methods. The data of cytogenetic analysis of the abortive material of 1487 women carried out in the GEN-LAB laboratory by the assignment from clinics in Moscow and the Moscow region were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age varied widely: from 14 to 49 years, amounting to 33.4±5.5 years. Cytogenetic analysis was performed after preliminary tissue cultivation according to the standard method. Statistical analysis of the results was carried out using the Statistica 10.0 software package (Statsoft, USA). Results. The number of chromosomal abnormalities (CAs) was found to be age-dependent and associated with the early term of NDP. The largest number of CAs was accounted for by on women aged 35 to 40 years, while in the age group over 40 years, the proportion of abortuses with and without anomalies did not differ significantly. A significantly larger number of CAs was found in the abortive material of women with NDP at the gestational age up to 12 weeks. The frequency of CAs did not significantly differ depending on the type of pregnancy: natural or as a result of in vitro fertilization. The largest difference depending on the patient age were related to the proportion of trisomies and triploidies: if the former were more often detected in women of late reproductive age (35 years and older), then the latter were more typical for abortions in women under 35 years of age. In women aged 45 years, a case of NDP with a probability of 50% is associated with the presence of at least one trisomy. At the age of 30, this probability is 30%. Conclusion. CAs in abortive material of women with NDP are detected in 51.2% of cases, numerical abnormalities prevail over structural ones. It is advisable to use cytogenetic analysis at the early stages of pregnancy planning to identify factors that can provoke its abortion.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. I Chepurnaya

LLC GEN-LAB

A. D Ermakova

LLC GEN-LAB

E. V Sudakova

LLC GEN-LAB

A. S Ivanyuk

LLC GEN-LAB

N. V Shilova

LLC GEN-LAB

Email: nvshilova@gmail.com
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Development Director

T. A Yamandi

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

References

  1. Селихова М.С., Дмитриенко Г.А., Кузнецова О.А. и др. Особенности течения беременности и родов у женщин с неразвивающейся беременностью в анамнезе. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколо-га. 2012;12(5):64-6
  2. Савельевой Г.М., Сухих ГТ., Серова В.Н. и др. Акушерство: национальное руководство. М., 2017
  3. Сидельникова В.М., Сухих ГТ. Невынашивание беременности: руководство для практикующих врачей. М., 2011
  4. Wu Y, Chen Y., Shen M., et al. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among singleton pregnancies in women of very advanced maternal age: a retrospective cohort study BMC. Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2147-9
  5. Волков А.Н., Рытенкова О.И., Бабарыкина Т.А. и др. Цитогенетическая диагностика хромосомных аномалий при неразвивающейся беременности. Клиническая лабораторная диагностика. 2017;62(9):553 56
  6. Fan M.J., Tian C., Chang L., et al. Analysis of clinical factors on early pregnancy loss during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer treatment and natural pregnancy. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018;25;53(11):755-60. Doi: 10.3760/ cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2018.11.005.
  7. Pal A.K., Ambulkar PS., Waghmare J.E., et al. Chromosomal Aberrations in Couples with Pregnancy Loss: A Retrospective Study. J Human Reprod Sci. 2018;11(3):247-53. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_124_17.
  8. Гинтер Е.К., Золотухина Т.В., Антоненко В.Г. и др. Цитогенетические методы хромосомных болезней: методическое пособие для врачей. М., 2009. С. 61-5.
  9. Harris M., Taylor G. Medical statistics made easy. London: Taylor and Francis, 2006
  10. Гонтарь Ю.В., Ильин И.Е., Парницкая О.И. Роль цитогенетического обследования семейной пары и абортивного материала при случае замершей беременности. Вестник проблем биологии и медицины. 2014;(3):73-7
  11. Тихомирова С.В., Диунов А.Г., Палютина Е.Ю. и др. Анализ аномалий кариотипа плода при неразвивающейся беременности, наступившей естественным путем. Вестник ИвГМА. 2015;(2):34-9
  12. Pylyp L.Y., Spynenko L.O., Verhoglyad N.V., et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in products of conception of first-trimester miscarriages detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis: a review of 1000 cases. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(2):265-71. doi: 10.1007/s10815 017-1069-1
  13. Fattet A.J., Toupance S., Thornton S.N., et al. Telomere length in granulosa cells and leukocytes: a potential marker of female fertility? A systematic review of the literature. J Ovarian Res. 2020;13(1):96. Doi: 10.1186/ s13048-020-00702-y
  14. Боярский К.Ю., Гайдуков С.Н., Леонченко В.В. Причины прерывания беременности после эко и ИКСИвпервом триместре: анализ клинических и цитогенетических данных. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2008;(4):73-5
  15. Спиридонова Н.В., Калинкина О.Б., Гильмиярова Ф.Н., и др. Взаимосвязь неразвивающейся беременности с хромосомной патологией плода. Казанский медицинский журнал. 2013;5:748 51
  16. Лаврушина Е.Н., Мелешкина О.И., Балдина О.А. и др. Характеристика кариотипа периферической крови супружеских пар с бесплодием. Мед. альманах. 2017;2(47):108-10

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies