Monitoring of patients with acromegaly in the real-life clinical practice settings


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Acromegaly is a severe chronic disease caused by hyperproduction of somatotropic hormone (GH), which significantly affects the quality and duration of life. Growth hormone hyperproduction leads to the development of severe comorbid diseases, including deformation of the axial skeleton, osteoarthritis, cardiovascular diseases, carbohydrate metabolism disorders, and some types of cancer. Compared to the general population, in patients with active acromegaly, early disability and an increase in mortality are noted. Objective. Estimation of the time of the last visit to the expert center for patients with acromegaly in the Moscow region, as well as the proportion of patients with controlled and uncontrolled acromegaly at the time of the last visit, and analysis of the types of treatment performed. Methods. A retrospective observational study was conducted. According to the data of the M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, there are 377 patients with acromegaly in the Moscow region. For the analysis, medical records of 327 patients with acromegaly observed in the M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute were selected. Controlled acromegaly was defined as a condition with the growth hormone level <2.5 ng/ml, and the insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) level within the age and gender reference range (except for patients receiving pegvisomant, in such cases only IGF- 1 level was taken into account). Results. The mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis was 49±14.1 years. The majority (52%) of patients were diagnosed between the ages of 41 and 60 years. The number of women (252 patients, 77%) was significantly higher compared to the number of men (75 patients, 23%). At the last visit, the mean age of the patients was 58±13.4 years; 171 (52.3%) patients had controlled acromegaly, 155 (47.4%) patients had uncontrolled acromegaly, and 1 (0.3%) patient had no evidence of acromegaly control at the last visit. In general, 56.6% of patients received neurosurgical treatment, 65.7% of patients received drug treatment, 27.5% of patients received somatostatin analogues as the first line of treatment, and 18.7% of patients received radiation treatment. The analysis made it possible to reveal that 50.8% of patients have not visited the endocrinologist of the CDC of the M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute since 2019 (inclusive). At the same time, half of them (50.6%) were without control of the underlying disease at the time of the last visit. Conclusions. It is recommended to consider the use of neurosurgical intervention in patients with acromegaly in all possible cases, especially if the disease remains active during therapy with somatostatin analogues at maximum dosages. Taking into account, in general, the accumulated experience of many years of use and the favorable efficacy/safety profile of somatostatin analogues, it is advisable to start drug therapy in individuals without achieving the target hormonal criteria for controlling acromegaly either immediately with high dosages, or by rapidly increasing the dose to the maximum possible.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Irena A. Ilovayskaya

M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

Email: irena.ilov@yandex.ru
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Neuroendocrine Diseases, Division of the General Endocrinology Moscow, Russian Federation

P. A Zakharova

M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

Department of Neuroendocrine Diseases, Division of General Endocrinology Moscow, Russian Federation

E. D Metlushko

M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

Department of Neuroendocrine Diseases, Division of General Endocrinology Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Дедов И.И, Молитвословова Н.Н., Рожинская Л.Я., Мельниченко Г.А. Федеральные клинические рекомендации по клинике, диагностике, дифференциальной диагностике и методам лечения акромегалии. Проблемы эндокринологии. 2013;59(6):4-18 doi: 10.14341/probl20135964-18.
  2. Dekkers O.M., Biermasz N.R., Pereira A.M., Romijn J.A., Vandenbroucke JP Mortality in acromegaly: a metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(1):61-7. Doi: 10.1210. 20071191.
  3. Bolfi F, Neves A.F., Boguszewski C.L., Nunes-Nogueira V.S. Mortality in acromegaly decreased in the last decade: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;179(1):59-71. doi: 10.1530/EJE-18-0255.
  4. Casanueva F.F., Barkan A.L., Buchfelder M, et al; Pituitary Society, Expert Group on Pituitary Tumors. Criteria for the definition of Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOE): A Pituitary Society Statement. Pituitary. 2017;20(5):489-98. doi: 10.1007/s11102-017-0838-2.
  5. Schofl C., Franz H., Grussendorf M., et al. Participants of the German Acromegaly Register. Long-term outcome in patients with acromegaly: analysis of 1344 patients from the German Acromegaly Register. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;168(1):39-47. doi: 10.1530/EJE-12-0602.
  6. Вагапова Г.Р., Пашаев Б.Ю., Ашимова Р.Р. и др. Эффективность лечения акромегалии в республике Татарстан по данным регионального регистра опухолей гипоталамо-гипофизарной области. Альманах клинической медицины. 2021;49(4):254-60. doi: 10.18786/2072- 0505-2021-49-040
  7. Анциферов М.Б., Алексеева Т.М., Пронин В.С. Московский регистр больных акромегалией: отдаленные результаты наблюдения. Фарматека. 2016;16(329):62-6.
  8. Maione L., Chanson P. National acromegaly registries. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Apr;33(2):101264. Doi: 10.1016/j. beem.2019.02.001.
  9. Delemer B., Chanson P., Foubert L., et al. Patients lost to follow-up in acromegaly: results of the ACROSPECT study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170(5):791-97. doi: 10.1530/EJE-13-0924.
  10. de Jesus Nunes R., Masullo L.F., de Fonseca Lira M.Z.R., et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the treatment of patients with acromegaly in a tertiary center: a wake-up call on the importance of telemedicine. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Jun 23:2359-3997000000491. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000491.
  11. Gatto F, Khorrami K., Nista F., et al. Acromegaly Management in a Tertiary Referral Center After 1 Year of the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic: A Double Challenge. Endocr Pract. 2021;27(8):856-57. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.05.005.
  12. Анциферов М.Б., Пронин Е.В., Алексеева Т.М., Пронин В.С. Предикторы эффективности медикаментозной терапии акромегалии (по данным московского регистра). Фарматека. 2020;27(4):50-56. doi: 10.18565/pharmateca.2020.4.50-56.
  13. Grasso L.F, Pivonello R., Colao A. Somatostatin analogs as a first-line treatment in acromegaly: when is it appropriate? Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2012;9(4):288-94. doi: 10.1097/MED. 0b013e328354af67
  14. Fleseriu M., Biller B.M.K., Freda P.U., et al. A Pituitary Society update to acromegaly management guidelines. Pituitary. 2021;24(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11102-020-01091-7.
  15. Виноградова А.В., Перфильев А.В., Триголосова И.В., Иловайская И.А. Эффективность лечения акромегалии Сандостатином ЛАР в дозах 10-40 мг. Фарматека. 2011;1:75-79.
  16. Иловайская И.А. Октреотид в лечении акромегалии - возможности высокодозной медикаментозной терапии. Медицинский совет. 2022;(10):148-52. doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2022-16-10-148-152.
  17. Caron P.J., Bevan J.S., Petersenn S., et al; PRIMARYS Investigators Group. Effects of lanreotide Autogel primary therapy on symptoms and quality-of-life in acromegaly: data from the PRIMARYS study. Pituitary. 2016;19(2):149-57. Doi: 10.1007/ s11102-015-0693-y.
  18. Caron P.J., Bevan J.S., Petersenn S., et al.; PRIMARYS Investigators. Tumor shrinkage with lanreotide Autogel 120 mg as primary therapy in acromegaly: results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(4):1282-90. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3318.
  19. Caron P.J., Bevan J.S., Petersenn S., et al.; PRIMARYS Investigators. Tumor shrinkage with lanreotide Autogel 120 mg as primary therapy in acromegaly: results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(4):1282-90. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3318.
  20. Neggers S.J., Pronin V., Balcere I., et al.; LEAD Study Group. Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg at extended dosing intervals in patients with acromegaly biochemically controlled with octreotide LAR: the LEAD study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(3):313-23. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0215.
  21. Salvatori R., Nachtigall L.B., Cook D.M., et al. SALSA Study Group. Effectiveness of selfor partner-administration of an extended-release aqueous-gel formulation of lanreotide in lanreotide-naive patients with acromegaly. Pituitary. 2010;13(2):115-22. Doi: 10.1007/ s11102-009-0207-x

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2022 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies