Dynamics of antibiotic resistance in the surgical departments of a multidisciplinary hospital using the example of the Republican Hospital n.a. V.A. Baranov

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. The problem of antibiotic resistance is one of the most pressing public health problems. Antibiotic resistance monitoring is necessary at all levels (global, national, local).

Objective. Assessment of the etiological structure and dynamics of antibiotic resistance of nosocomial pathogens in the leading multidisciplinary institution of the Republic of Karelia (Republican Hospital n.a. V.A. Baranov, Petrozavodsk) for 2019–2022.

Methods. All microbiological studies performed in 2019 and from June 2021 to June 2022 were analyzed. A summary of the data, statistical grouping, followed by a tabular and graphical presentation of the information obtained are presented.

Results. The largest number of cultures was performed in the intensive care unit № 1 (ICU-1), sputum tests predominated. The main pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) (30.82% in 2019 and 30.71% in 2021-2022), Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) (29.45 and 35.71%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) (17.12 and 16.43%). The microflora was resistant to most antibiotics. In the surgical department, wound discharge was examined more often; K. pneumoniae predominated (33.77 and 36.17%). In the neurosurgical department – cultures of wound discharge (26.72 and 31.53%), sputum (28.44 and 29.73%) and urine (36.20 and 26.42%) were examined. The following microorganisms were isolated from wound discharge in 2019: K. pneumoniae (31.25%), sensitive to meropenem and amikacin in all cases, Enterococcus spp. (25%), in all cases sensitive only to vancomycin and linezolid, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) (18.75%), in all cases sensitive to cefoxitin. Wound discharge in 2021–2022: S. aureus (45.16%), 50% sensitive to cefoxitin, K. pneumoniae (16.13%, of which 20% of strains are sensitive to cefotaxime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, 60% – to meropenem, 40% – to amikacin). K. pneumoniae (40 and 45.45%), P. aeruginosa (20 and 10%) and A. baumannii (16.67 and 15.15%) predominated as the causative agent of lower respiratory tract infection in the neurosurgical department in both periods.

Conclusion. In surgical departments, gram-negative microflora dominated as causative agents of nosocomial infections. A significant decrease in the sensitivity of all types of pathogens to antimicrobial drugs was revealed.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Nadezhda L. Ryabkova

Petrozavodsk State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: nadl-ryabkova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9434-7931
SPIN-code: 3652-4255

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor at the Department of Hospital Therapy

Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk

E. B. Moskvina

Republican Hospital n.a. V.A. Baranov

Email: nadl-ryabkova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-4170-7068
Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk

References

  1. Виноградова А.Г., Кузьменков А.Ю. Организация данных как основа локального мониторинга антибиотикорезистентности. Клиническая Микробиология и Антимикробная Химиотерапия 2020;2:137–141. [Vinogradova A.G., Kuzmenkov A.Yu. Data handling as a basis for local antimicrobial resistance surveillance. Kliniceskaa Mikrobiologia i Antimikrobnaa Himioterapia 2020;2:137–141. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.36488/cmac.2020.2.137–41.
  2. Zhou, N., Cheng, Z., Zhang, X. et al. Global antimicrobial resistance: a system-wide comprehensive investigation using the Global One Health Index. Infect Dis Poverty. 2022;11:92. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-01016-5.
  3. Программа СКАТ (Стратегия Контроля Антимикробной Терапии) при оказании стационарной медицинской помощи: Российские клинические рекомендации. Под ред. С.В. Яковлева, Н.И. Брико, С.В. Сидоренко, Д.Н. Проценко. М.: Издательство «Перо», 2018. 156 с. [Strategy for Control of Antimicrobial Therapy in the provision of inpatient medical care: Russian clinical guidelines. Ed. by S.V. Yakovlev, N.I. Briko, S.V. Sidorenko, D.N. Protsenko. Moskow: «Pero» Publishing House, 2018. 156 p. URL: https://antimicrob.net/wp-content/ uploads/skat.pdf.
  4. Методические рекомендации «Диагностика и антимикробная терапия инфекций, вызванных полирезистентными штаммами микроорганизмов (обновление 2022 г.)». [Methodological recommendations “Diagnostics and antimicrobial therapy of infections caused by multidrug-resistant strains of microorganisms (updated 2022)”. (In Russ.)]. URL: https://www.antibiotic.ru/iacmac/news/obnovlennye-metodicheskie-rekomendacii-diagnostika-i-antimikrobnaya-terapiya-infekcij-vyzvannyh-polirezistentnymi-shtammami-mikroorganizmov/ (ссылка доступна на 07.05.2023 / link available on 05/07/2023).
  5. Тимофеева О.Г., Поликарпова С.В. Локальный микробиологический мониторинг штаммов Enterobacterales, продуцирующих карбапенемазы. Лабораторная служба. 2019;8(3):14–19. [Timofeeva O.G., Polikarpova S.V. Local microbiological monitoring of carbapenemases-producing Enterobacterales. Laboratornaya sluzhba. 2019;8(3):14–19. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.17116/labs2019803114.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig.1.

Download (85KB)
3. Fig.2.

Download (70KB)
4. Fig.3.

Download (83KB)
5. Fig.4.

Download (58KB)
6. Fig.5.

Download (46KB)
7. Fig.6.

Download (57KB)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies