EXPERIENCE OF PERSONALIZED APPOINTMENT OF NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENT WITH BREAST CANCER: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. One of the most significant reasons for the low effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) of breast cancer (BC) is the lack of a personalized approach to the choice of conventional chemotherapy regimens. Objective. Development and prospective clinical testing of the algorithm for personalized administration of NACT for BC patients using molecular-genetic tumor markers. Methods. All patients participating in the study were divided into two groups. The first (study) group included 37 patients with breast cancer. In these patients, before the start of the treatmenT., DNA and RNA were isolated from the tumor tissue from the biopsy; representation and expression levels of ABC transporter genes and the BRCA1, Top2A., TYMS and TUBB3 sensitivity genes were determined using the CytoScan HD Array microarray (Affymetrix, USA) and quantitative PCR. Based on the results of molecular genetic analysis, the treatment tactics were personalized for patients. The second group (historical control) included 71 patients with luminal B HER2(-) breast cancer, who received NACT without taking into account the molecular genetic characteristics of the tumor. Results. The study included 108 patients with luminal HER2(-) - BC. A two-stage algorithm for the personalized assignment of NACT was developed. At the first stage, the reasonability of preoperative treatment was determined based on the markers of the ABC genes and regions 18p11.1-32; 11q21- 25 and 1q21.3-44 representation; and in the second stage, in the case of a positive results, a personalized choice of the regimen was made based on the markers of the representation and the expression of sensitivity genes. Personalized NACT was assigned to 26 of 37 patients; 11 patients started treatment with surgery, as they had no indication for chemotherapy in the preoperative period. The immediate efficacy of NACT in the study group was 88.5% (23 of 26), stabilization was observed in 5 (11.5%) patients. In the control grouР., the immediate efficacy of NACT was 53.5% (38 of 71), stabilization and progression were observed in 46.5% (33 of 71) patients. Differences between the groups were statistically significant (p=0.002). Conclusion. New informative predictive criteria have been determined; their use has significantly increased the efficacy of NACT in comparison with standard approaches to prescribing preoperative treatment.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

E. M Slonimskaya

Research Institute of Oncology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Siberian State Medical University

Email: slonimskaya@rambler.ru
MD, Prof., Head of the Department of General Oncology

P. V Kazantseva

Research Institute of Oncology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

N. V Litviakov

Research Institute of Oncology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

M. M Tsyganov

Research Institute of Oncology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

M. K Ibragimova

Research Institute of Oncology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; National Research Tomsk State University

A. V Doroshenko

Research Institute of Oncology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

R. U Vernadsky

Research Institute of Oncology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

M. A Vostrikova

Siberian State Medical University

N. A Lushnikova

Siberian State Medical University

References

  1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C., Allen C., Barber R.M., et al. Regional and national cancer incidence mortality years of life losT., years lived with disability, and disability adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(4):524-72. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688.
  2. Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В. Злокачественные заболевания в России в 2014 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М., 2016. 250 с.
  3. Gnant M., Herbeck N., Thomssen Ch. St. Gallen/ Vienna 2017: A Brief Summary of the Consensus Discussion about Escalation and De-Escalation of Primary Breast Cancer Treatment. Breast Care. 2017;12:102-7. doi: 10.1159/000475698.
  4. Семиглазов В.Ф. Многоликая биология рака молочной железы: поиски адекватного лечения. Злокачественные опухоли. 2016;3:5-10.
  5. Sikov W.M., Berty D.A., Perou C.M., et al. impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage ii to iii triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33(1):13-21. doi: 10.1200/JC0.2014.57.0572.
  6. Yu K., Sang Q.A., Lung P.Y., et al. Personalized chemotherapy selection for breast cancer using gene expression profiles. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:43294. doi: 10.1038/srep43294.
  7. Rao S., Beckman R.A., Riazi S., et al. Quantification and expert evaluation of evidence for chemopredictive biomarkers to personalize cancer treatment. Oncotarget. 2017;8(23):37923-34. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13544
  8. Gillet J.Р., Gottesman M.M. Overcoming multidrug esistance in cancer: 35 years after the discovery of ABCB1. Drug Resist. Updat. 2012;15(1-2):2-4. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2012.03.001.
  9. Litviakov N.V., Cherdyntseva N.V., Tsyganov M.M., et al. Deletions of multidrug resistance gene loci in breast cancer leads to the down-regulation of its expression and predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Oncotarget. 2016;7(7):7829-41. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6953
  10. Литвяков, Н.В., Цыганов, М.М., ЧердынцевА., Н.В. и др. Микроматричный анализ аномалий числа копий ДНК опухоли молочной железы: связь с эффектом неоадъювантной химиотерапии. Сибирский онкологический журнал. 2014;3:19-
  11. Юмов Е.Л., Цыганов М.М., Литвяков Н.В. и др. Экспрессия генов множественной лекарственной устойчивости и монорезистентности при немелкоклеточном раке легкого. Сибирский онкологический журнал. 2014;1:16-22.
  12. Казанцева П. В., Цыганов М.М., Слонимская Е.М. и др. Молекулярно-генетические маркеры эффективности неоадъювантной химиотерапии с применениемантрациклиновубольныхракоммо-лочной железы. Сибирский онкологический журнал. 2016;3:29-35.
  13. Nikolényi A., Sükösd F., Kaizer L., et al. Tumor topoisomerase ii alpha status and response to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Oncology. 2011;80(3-4:269-77. doi: 10.1159/000329038.
  14. Susini T., Berti B., Carriero C., et al. Topoisomerase ii alpha and TLE3 as predictive markers of response to anthracycline and taxane-containing regimens for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Onco. Targets Ther. 2013;7:2111-20. Doi: https://doi. org/10.2147/OTT.S71646
  15. Brouckaert O., Wildiers H., Floris G., Neven P. Update on triple-negative breast cancer: prognosis and management strategies. int. J. Womens Health. 2012;4:511-21. doi: 10.2147/iJWH.S18541.
  16. Liu Y., Li Q., Zhou L., et al. Cancer drug resistance: redox resetting renders a way. Oncotarget. 2016;7(27):42740-61. Doi: 10.18632/ oncotarget.8600.
  17. Byrski T., Huzarski T., Dent R., et al. Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant cisplatin in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients. Breast Сancer Res. Treat. 2014;147(2):401-5. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3100-x.
  18. Kriege M., Jager A., Hooning M.J., et al. The efficacy of taxane chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer. 2012;118(4):899-907. Doi: 10.1002/ cncr.26351.
  19. Karki R., Mariani M., Andreoli M., et al. ßiii-Tubulin: biomarker of taxane resistance or drug target? Expert Opin. Ther. Targets. 2013;17(4):461-72. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2013.766170.
  20. Wikman H., Westphal L., Schmid F., et al. Loss of CADM1 expression is associated with poor prognosis and brain metastasis in breast cancer patients. Oncotarget. 2014;5(10):3076-87. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.1832

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies