Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with Crohn’s disease in real clinical practice


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Currently, there is a need to develop new types of drugs for the treatment of patients with Crohn's disease (CD), which would make it possible to achieve rapid induction of clinical remission, reduce the risk of immunogenicity and other side effects, and reduce the number of side effects. Objective. Retrospective assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of therapy with ustekinumab (UST) in patients with moderate-to-severe CD in real clinical practice. Methods. To assess the efficacy and safety of UST, we included in the study 11 patients with CD who received an induction course of therapy with this drug starting from January 2020. There were 18.2% of men, 81.8% of women, mean age was 34,4±6.8 years, disease duration - 8.4±3.2 years. The vast majority of patients (90.9%) received immunosuppressants and glucocorticosteroids. All patients were previously treated with with genetically engineered biological drugs (GIBD). Results. After induction of UST, 10 patients during the first week showed a decrease in the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) by more than 100 points. In 6 (54.5%) patients at 6 weeks of therapy, clinical remission according to CDAI was noted, 4 (36.4%) patients achieved clinical response rates, and 1 (9.1%) patient did not show any positive dynamics. In 2 of 6 patients who achieved clinical remission by the 15th week from the start of the UST administration, there was an increase in the stool frequency with type 6 stool consistency according to the Bristol scale. In this regard, it was decided to reduce the intervals between repeated injections of UST from 12 to 8 weeks. After that, the clinical picture of the disease improved. After 12 weeks, clinical remission was achieved in 8 (72.7%) patients, the clinical response persisted in 2 (18.2%) CD patients. Most patients with clinical remission at 12 weeks have also achieved mucosal healing. At week 12, endoscopic examination was performed in 6 patients, 5 (45.4%) of them were diagnosed with endoscopic remission (SES-CD <,4). After 12 weeks, in all patients who responded to UST therapy, CDAI decreased on average from 425.0±49.3 to 128.6±110.6 points, and the Crohn's disease endoscopic activity index - from 7.8±2.4 to 3.2±1.2points. At the same time, the C-reactive protein level decreased on average from 35.1±34.3 to 6.6±3.8 mg/L. Fecal calprotectin level decreased on average from 1382.0±474.2 to 405.0±47.3 pg/g. At the 48th week of the study, 10 patients were examined, 7 (63.6%) of whom had endoscopic remission (SES-CD <,4) and complete healing of lesions of the intestinal mucosa. In 3 patients, complete clinical and endoscopic remission was not achieved, most of them previously received more than 3 GIBDs - 3 anti-TNF-а drugs registered in the Russian Federation for the treatment of CD, and an a4@7 integrin blocker. It should be noted that 10 (90.9%) patients who achieved clinical remission after the induction course of UST, maintained it by 48 weeks of follow-up by the time of completion of the analysis. Conclusion. This clinical observation of a small group of CD patients, as well as previous multicenter studies, demonstrated the high efficiency of UST in induction and maintenance therapy in a cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe CD resistant to disease-modifying agents and GIBD.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

O. V Knyazev

Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center; National Medical Research Center for Coloproctology n.a. A.N. Ryzhikh; Research Institute for Health Organization and Medical Management

Moscow, Russia

A. V Kagramanova

Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center

Moscow, Russia

A. A Lishchinskaya

Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center

Moscow, Russia

I. A Li

Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center

Moscow, Russia

E. A Sabelnikova

Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center

Moscow, Russia

A. F Babayan

Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center

Moscow, Russia

M. Yu Zvyaglova

Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center

Moscow, Russia

E. Yu Zhulina

Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center

Moscow, Russia

D. S Kulakov

Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center; Research Institute for Health Organization and Medical Management

Moscow, Russia

A. V Veselov

National Medical Research Center for Coloproctology n.a. A.N. Ryzhikh; Research Institute for Health Organization and Medical Management

Moscow, Russia

N. A Fadeeva

Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center; Research Institute for Health Organization and Medical Management

Moscow, Russia

B. A Nanaeva

National Medical Research Center for Coloproctology n.a. A.N. Ryzhikh

Moscow, Russia

A. I Parfenov

Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center

Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Хатьков И.Е., Парфенов А.И., Князев О.В. и др. Воспалительные заболевания кишечника в практике терапевта и хирурга. Вита-ПРЕСС, 2017. 120 с
  2. Ng S.C., Shi H.Y, Hamidi N., et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: A systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet. 2018;390:2769-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32448-0.
  3. Kappelman M.D., Rifas-Shiman S.L., Kleinman K., et al. The prevalence and geographic distribution of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1424-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.07.012.
  4. Loftus E.V The burden of inflammatory bowel disease in the United States: a moving target? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1383-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.10.016.
  5. Peery A.F, Crocket S.D., Murphy C.C., et al. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: update 2018. Gastroenterology. 2018;156(1):254-72. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.063.
  6. Ивашкин В.Т, Шелыгин Ю.А., Абдулганиева Д.И. и др. Клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению болезни Крона (проект). Колопроктология. 2020;19(2[72]):8-38.
  7. Peyrin-Biroulet L., et al. Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE):Determining therapeutic goals for treat-to-target. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1324-38. Doi: 10.1038/ ajg.2015.233.
  8. Lichtenstein G., et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn's Disease in Adults. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:481-517. Doi: 10.1038/ ajg.2018.27.
  9. Torres J., et al. ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Crohn's Disease: Medical Treatment J Crohns Colitis. 2020;14(1):4-22. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz180.
  10. Князев О.В., Чурикова А.А. Антицитокиновая терапия и качество жизни больных воспалительными заболеваниями кишечника. Доказательная гастроэнтерология. 2014;2:17-23.
  11. Gisbert J.P, Marin A.C., McNichollA.G., Chaparro M. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of a second anti-TNF in patients with inflammatory bowel disease whose previous anti-TNF treatment has failed. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41(7):613-23. doi: 10.1111/apt.13083.
  12. Gordon J.P, McEwan PC., Maguire A., et al. Characterizing unmet medical need and the potential role of new biologic treatment options in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease: a systematic review and clinician surveys. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27(7):804-12. Doi: 10.1097/ MEG.0000000000000378.
  13. Белоусова E.A., Халиф И.Л., Абдулганиева Д.И. и др. Социально-демографическая характеристика, особенности течения и варианты лечения воспалительных заболеваний кишечника в России. Результаты двух многоцентровых исследований. Альманах клинической медицины. 2018;46(6):445-63
  14. Yanai H., Hanauer S.B. Assessing response and loss of response to biological therapies in IBD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:685-98. Doi: 10.1038/ ajg.2011.103.
  15. Peyrin-Biroulet L., et al. Treatment satisfaction, preferences and perception gaps between patients and physicians in the ulcerative colitis CARES study: a real world-based study. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48(6):601-7. Doi: 10.1016/j. dld.2016.01.013.
  16. Daperno M., D'Haens G., VanAssche G. Development and validation of a new, simplified endoscopic activity score for Crohn's disease: the SES>CD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60(4):505-12. Doi: 10.1016/ s0016-5107(04)01878-4.
  17. Feagan B.G., al. Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn's Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(20):1946-60. Doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa1602773.
  18. Sandborn W.J., Rutgeerts P, Gasink C., et al. Longterm efficacy and safety of ustekinumab for Crohn's disease through the second year of therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48:65-77. Doi: 10.1111/ apt.14794.
  19. Li K., Chan D., Pollack P, et al. Efficacy of ustekinumab for induction and maintenance of histological healing in patients with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(Suppl. 1):S595.
  20. Battat R., Kopylov U., Bessissow T., et al. Association between ustekinumab trough concentrations and clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:1427-34.
  21. Ma C, Fedorak R.N., Kaplan G.G., et at. Clinical, endoscopic and radiographic outcomes with ustekinumab in medicallyrefractory Crohn's disease: Real world experience from a multicentre cohort. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45:1232-43. doi: 10.1111/apt.14016.
  22. Шапина М.В., Нанаева Б.А., Варданян А.В. Эффективность и безопасность устекинумаба при болезни Крона (обзор литературы). Колопроктология. 2019;183(69):119-30.
  23. Adedokun O.J, Xu Z, Gasink C, et al. Pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationships of intravenously administered ustekinumab during induction treatment in patients with Crohn's disease: results from the UNITI-1 and UNITI-2 studies [abstract no. OP028]. J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10 (Suppl. 1):S23-24
  24. Waljee A.K, Wallace B.I, Cohen-Mekelburg S. Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Remission in Patients With Moderate to Severe Crohn Disease. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(5):e193721. Doi: 10.1001/ jamanetworkopen.2019.3721

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies