New possibilities of predicting the outcome of induced labor
- Authors: Tesakova M.L.1
-
Affiliations:
- Belarusian State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 32, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 110-116
- Section: Original articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2073-4034/article/view/688971
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/pharmateca.2025.3.110-116
- ID: 688971
Cite item
Abstract
Background: In modern obstetrics, induced labor is one of the generally recognized methods of terminating pregnancy. Most publications note that the main indications for labor induction are a pregnancy period of more than 287 days, premature rupture of membranes, and extragenital pathology. However, data on the results of induction are contradictory. Along with studies indicating improved pregnancy and labor outcomes with the use of induction, opposite data have been published on an increase in the frequency of cesarean sections and instrumental assistance during childbirth. A favorable outcome of spontaneous and induced labor depends on the readiness of the pregnant woman’s body for childbirth. In human reproduction, the leading role of the immune system in carrying a pregnancy and initiating labor has been determined. Markers of these complex immunological events are the body’s reactions that occur as a local and systemic inflammatory response. The preliminary inflammatory process, developing in the cervix, leads to its remodeling before labor. The activity of this process can be used to judge the readiness of the pregnant woman’s body for labor. Determination of total glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in cervical mucus, the level of which reflects the activity of preliminary inflammation in the cervix, is a non-invasive method for diagnosing readiness for labor and, accordingly, an effective response to labor induction. The level of total glycosaminoglycans in cervical mucus before labor induction allows predicting an unfavorable outcome of labor - an emergency cesarean section.
Objective: Determination of total GAG level in cervical mucus that predict the outcome of induced labor.
Materials and methods: An open prospective study was conducted involving 118 women with full-term pregnancy who delivered in the healthcare institution «Clinical Maternity Hospital of Minsk Region». Using the spectrophotometric method and calculation formulas the concentration of total glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in the cervical mucus of pregnant women was determined before and after pre-induction of labor with drugs or mechanical means, as well as in pregnant women with term labor before the spontaneous onset of labor. The total GAGs levels in the cervical mucus were used to assess the outcomes of labor – completion through the natural birth canal or emergency cesarean section.
Results: The concentration of total glycosaminoglycans in the cervical mucus of pregnant women at the time of spontaneous onset of physiological labor has an average value of 2.7 g/l in the interval of 7 days before the onset of labor. Low levels of total GAGs in the cervical mucus of pregnant women before preinduction of labor, regardless of the chosen method, predict the risk of labor ending in cesarean section due to complications for the mother and/or fetus. In induced labor ending in cesarean section, the concentration of total GAGs in the cervical mucus before preinduction was 2 times lower than in the case of labor ending in vaginal delivery (p=0.039). In the case of cervical preparation by mechanical means, the risk of cesarean section before preinduction (1–24 hours) was demonstrated by the level of total GAGs in the cervical mucus of 2.0 g/L or less when using laminaria, and 0.2 g/L or less when using a Foley catheter. When pre-induction of labor was performed with a drug (dinoprostone gel for vaginal administration), the completion of induced labor by cesarean section was associated with the level of total GAGs in cervical mucus of 1.4 g/l or less, determined 4–6 hours after the introduction of the inducer.
Conclusion: Low levels of total GAGs before and after pre-induction of labor with drugs or mechanical means indicate the likelihood of complications in induced labor and their completion by surgery. Caesarean section in this situation is an emergency.
Full Text

About the authors
Marina L. Tesakova
Belarusian State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: dr-morish@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-9025-6538
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Advanced Training and Retraining of Healthcare Personnel
Belarus, MinskReferences
- Тесакова М.Л. Индуцированные роды: информационное поле последнего десятилетия. Современные перинатальные медицинские технологии в решении проблем демографической безопасности. 2021;14:263–274. [Tesakova M.L. Induced labor: the information field of the last decade. Sovremennye perinatal’nye meditsinskie tekhnologii v reshenii problem demograficheskoi bezopasnosti. Minsk, 2021;14:263–274. (In Russ.)].
- Доронина О.К. Индукция родов при доношенной беременности. Цервидил – вагинальная терапевтическая система с динопростоном. Акушерство и гинекология: новости, мнения, обучение. 2021;9(3):46–51. [Doronina O.K. Induction of labor at full-term pregnancy. Cervidil - vaginal therapeutic system with dinoprostone.Akusherstvo i ginekologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie. 2021;9(3):46–51. (In Russ.)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.33029/2303-9698-2021-9-3-46-51
- Соловьева А.В., Кузнецова О.А., Смирнова Т.В. Индукция родов: курс на эффективность и безопасность (обзор мировых данных). Акушерство и гинекология: новости, мнения, обучение. 2022;10(3):86–91. [Solov’eva A.V., Kuznetsova O.A., Smirnova T.V. Induction of labour: a course towards efficacy and safety (review of global data). Akusherstvo i ginekologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie. 2022;10(3):86–91. (In Russ.)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.33029/2303-9698-2022-10-3-86-91
- WHO recommendations for Induction of labour. Geneva, 2014. 40 p.
- Новикова О.Н. Индуцированные роды: исходы беременностей и родов, влияние на состояние новорожденных. Фундаментальная и клиническая медицина. 2018;3(3):59–64. [Novikova O.N. Induced labor: pregnancy and birth outcomes, impact on newborns. Fundamental’naya i klinicheskaya meditsina. 2018;3(3):59–64. (In Russ.)].
- Гурьев Д.Л., Охапкин М.Б., Гурьева Д.Д. и др. Оценка эффективности индукции родов в стационаре. Русский медицинский журнал. Мать и дитя. 2020;3(1):9–15. [Gur’ev D.L., Okhapkin M.B., Gur’eva D.D., et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of labor induction in hospital. Russkiy meditsinskiy zhurnal. Mat’ i ditya. 2020;3(1):9–15. (In Russ.)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.32364/2618-8430-2020-3-1-9-15
- Благодарный Г.В., Мозговая Е.В. Оценка эффективности и безопасности методов родовозбуждения с применением простагландина Е1. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2017;66(1):9–20. [Blagodarnyi G.V., Mozgovaya E.V. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of methods of labor induction using prostaglandin E1. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh boleznei. 2017;66(1):9–20. (In Russ.)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17816/JOWD6619-20
- Новикова О.Н., Соломатина О.А. Индуцированные роды: исходы беременностей и родов, влияние на состояние новорожденных. Мать и дитя в Кузбассе. 2018;2:31–35. [Novikova O.N., Solomatina O.A. Induced labor: pregnancy and birth outcomes, impact on the condition of newborns. Mat’ i ditya v Kuzbasse. 2018;(2):31–35. (In Russ.)].
- Имангалиева А.С., Алмаханова А.А., Алтынбекова М.Ж. и др. Течение неонатального периода у новорожденных после индуцированных родов. Молодой ученый. 2015;6:261–268. [Imangalieva A.S., Almakhanova A.A., Altynbekova M.Zh., et al. The course of the neonatal period in newborns after induced labor. Molodoi uchenyi. 2015;(6):261–268. (In Russ.)].
- Коваленко Л.В., Белоцерковцева Л.Д., Шерстюк Ю.А. Современные методы диагностики гипоксии плода в интранатальном периоде. Вестник СурГУ. Медицина. 2023;16(1):14–19. [Kovalenko L.V., Belotserkovtseva L.D., Sherstyuk Yu.A. Modern methods of diagnosing fetal hypoxia in the intranatal period. Vestnik SurGU. Meditsina. 2023;16(1):14–19. (In Russ.)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.35266/2304-9448-2023-1-14-19
- Белан Э.Б., Тибирькова Е.В., Осипов С.А. и др. Иммунологические аспекты репродукции. Волгоград, 2019. [Belan E.B., Tibir’kova E.V., Osipov S.A., et al. Immunological aspects of reproduction. Volgograd, 2019. (In Russ.)].
- Тесакова М.Л. Готовность к родам: научные перспективы и практические возможности диагностики (клинические лекции). Охрана материнства и детства. 2020;1:78–90. [Tesakova M.L. Preparedness for childbirth: scientific perspectives and practical diagnostic possibilities (clinical lectures). Okhrana materinstva i detstva. 2020;(1):78–90. (In Russ.)].
- Ludmir J., Sehdev H.M. Anatomy and physiology of the uterine cervix. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000;43(3):433–439. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003081-200009000-00003
- Воскресенский С.Л., Исмаил М.Н., Кадырко С.М., Кириленко В.П. Биохимические аспекты созревания шейки матки. Медицинские новости. 2003;7:3–7. [Voskresenskii S.L., Ismail M.N., Kadyrko S.M., Kirilenko V.P. Biochemical aspects of cervical maturation. Meditsinskie novosti. 2003;(7):3–7. (In Russ.)].
- Воскресенский С.Л., Федорков А.Ч., Иванчик Г.И., Малолеткина О.Л. Лейкоцитарный состав цервикальной слизи у беременных женщин накануне срочных родов. Репродуктивное здоровье. Восточная Европа. 2012;1:28–35. [Voskresenskii S.L., Fedorkov A.Ch., Ivanchik G.I., Maloletkina O.L. Leukocyte composition of cervical mucus in pregnant women on the eve of term delivery. Reproduktivnoe zdorov’e. Vostochnaya Evropa. 2012;(1):28–35. (In Russ.)].
- Myers D.A. The recruitment and activation of leukocytes into the immune cervix: further support that cervical remodeling involves an immune inflammatory mechanism. Biol Reprod. 2012;87(5):107. https://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.112.105049
- Бахмач В.О., Чехонацкая М.Л., Яннаева Н.Е. и др. Изменения матки и шейки матки во время беременности и накануне родов (обзор). Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал. 2011;7(2):396–400. [Bakhmach V.O., Chekhonatskaya M.L., Yannaeva N.E. et al. Changes in the uterus and cervix during pregnancy and before labor (review). Saratovskii nauchno-meditsinskii zhurnal. 2011;7(2):396–400. (In Russ.)].
- Воскресенский С.Л., Тесакова М.Л., Федорков А.Ч., Юрага Т.М. Метаболическая активность соединительной и мышечной тканей на протяжении беременности, родов и послеродового периода. Медицинские новости. 2012;9:22–26. [Voskresenskii S.L., Tesakova M.L., Fedorkov A.Ch., Yuraga T.M. Metabolic activity of connective and muscle tissues during pregnancy, labor, and the postpartum period. Meditsinskie novosti. 2012;(9):22–26. (In Russ.)].
- Щербаков В.И., Рябиченко Т.И., Скосырева Г.А. и др. Локальное воспаление как компонент срочных самопроизвольных родов. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2018;18(3):13–19. [Shcherbakov V.I., Ryabichenko T.I., Skosyreva G.A., et al. Local inflammation as a component of urgent spontaneous labor. Rossiiskii vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2018;18(3):13–19. (In Russ.)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/rosakush201818313-19
- Greiling H. Die turbdimetrische Bestimmung von Sulfomucopolysacchariden mit Resochin. Rheumaforsch Z. 1961;20:17.
Supplementary files
