Обзор клинических рекомендаций Американского конгресса реабилитационной медицины (ACRM) по диагностике и лечению пациентов с хроническим нарушением сознания


Цитировать

Полный текст

Открытый доступ Открытый доступ
Доступ закрыт Доступ предоставлен
Доступ закрыт Доступ платный или только для подписчиков

Аннотация

Диагностика и лечение пациентов с хроническим нарушением сознания (ХНС) остаются недостаточно изученным разделом медицины, испытывающим значительную потребность в фактологических данных. Проблематика пациентов с ХНС заключается в неопределенности прогноза на повышение уровня бодрствования, крайне высокой зависимости от наличия и качества ухода, большого количества осложнений, возникающих по мере течения заболевания. Настоящая публикация является переводом с английского языка клинических рекомендаций Американской академии неврологии (AAN), Американского конгресса реабилитационной медицины (ACRM) по диагностике и лечению пациентов с ХНС, опубликованных в 2018 г. (Giacino J.T., Katz D.I., Schiff N.D. et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: Disorders of consciousness. Neurology. 2018;91(11):450-60. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000005926).

Полный текст

Доступ закрыт

Об авторах

В. А Белкин

Клинический институт мозга, Уральский государственный медицинский университет

Email: vbelkin@neuro-ural.ru
старший ординатор отделения реанимационной реабилитации

Список литературы

  1. Giacino J.T., Katz D.I., Schiff N.D., et al. Comprehensive systematic review update summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology. 2018;91(10):461-70. Doi: 10.1212/ WNL.0000000000005928.
  2. Andrews K., Murphy L., Munday R., Littlewood C. Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. BMJ. 1996;313:13-6.
  3. Lovstad M., Froslie K.F., Giacino J.T., et al. Reliability and diagnostic characteristics of the JFK Coma Recovery Scaleerevised: exploring the influence of rater's level of experience. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25:349-56. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181cec841.
  4. Turgeon A.F., Lauzier F., Simard J.F., et al. Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort study. CMAJ. 2011;183:1581-88. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101786.
  5. Whyte J., Nordenbo A.M., Kalmar K., et al. Medical complications during inpatient rehabilitation among patients with traumatic disorders of consciousness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1877-83. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.027.
  6. Davidson G.H., Hamlat C.A., Rivara F.P., et al. Longterm survival of adult trauma patients. JAMA. 2011;305:1001-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.259.
  7. Cortese M.D., Riganello F., Arcuri F., et al. Coma Recovery ScaleeR: variability in the disorder of consciousness. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:186. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0455-5.
  8. Candelieri A., Cortese M.D., Dolce G., et al. Visual pursuit: within-day variability in the severe disorder of consciousness. J. Neurotrauma. 2011;28:2013-17. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1885.
  9. Bardin J.C., Fins J.J., Katz D.I., et al. Dissociations between behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluations of cognitive function after brain injury. Brain. 2011;134:769-82. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr005.
  10. Schnakers C., Zasler N. Assessment and management of pain in patients with disorders of consciousness. PM R. 2015;7:270-77. Doi: 10.1016/j. pmrj.2015.09.016.
  11. Majerus S., Gill-Thwaites H., Andrews K., Laureys S. Behavioral evaluation of consciousness in severe brain damage. Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:397-413.
  12. Schnakers C., Vanhaudenhuyse A., Giacino J., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol2009;9:35.
  13. Childs N.L., Mercer W.N., Childs H.W. Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Neurology 1993;43:1465-67.
  14. Smart C.M., Giacino J.T., Cullen T., et al. A case of locked-in syn- drome complicated by central deafness. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008;4:448-53. doi: 10.1038/ncpneuro0823.
  15. Laureys S., Pellas F., Van Eeckhout P., et al. The locked-in syndrome: what is it like to be conscious but paralyzed and voiceless? Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:495-511.
  16. Giacino J.T., Kalmar K., Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scalee Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:2020-29.
  17. Seel R.T., Sherer M., Whyte J., et al. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1795-813. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.218.
  18. Whyte J., DiPasquale M.C., Vaccaro M. Assessment of command- following in minimally conscious brain injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:653-60.
  19. Shiel A., Horn S.A., Wilson B.A., et al. The Wessex Head Injury Matrix (WHIM) main scale: a preliminary report on a scale to assess and monitor patient recovery after severe head injury. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14:408-16.
  20. Gill-Thwaites H., Munday R. The Sensory Modality Assessment Rehabilitation Technique (SMART): a valid and reliable assessment for the vegetative and minimally conscious state patient. Brain Inj. 2004;18:1255-69.
  21. Ansell B.J., Keenan J.E. The Western Neuro Sensory Stimulation Pro- file: a tool for assessing slow-to-recover head-injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70:104-8.
  22. Pape T.L., Heinemann A.W., Kelly J.P., et al. A measure of neurobehavioral functioning after coma. Part I: theory, reliability, and validity of Disorders of Consciousness Scale. J. Rehabil Res Dev. 2005; 42:1-17.
  23. Rader M.A., Ellis D.W. The Sensory Stimulation Assessment Measure (SSAM): a tool for early evaluation of severely brain-injured patients. Brain Inj. 1994;8:309-21.
  24. Monti M.M., Rosenberg M., Finoia P., et al. Thalamofrontal connectivity mediates top-down cognitive functions in disorders of consciousness. Neurology. 2015;84:167-73. Doi: 10.1212/ WNL.0000000000001123.
  25. Kotchoubey B., Yu T., Mueller F., et al. True or false? Activations of language-related areas in patients with disorders of consciousness. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20:4239-47.
  26. Stender J., Gosseries O., Bruno M.A., et al. Diagnostic precision of PET imaging and functional MRI in disorders of consciousness: a clinical validation study Lancet. 2014;384:514-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60042-8.
  27. Sitt J.D., King J.R., Karoui I., et al. Large scale screening of neural signatures of consciousness in patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state. Brain. 2014;137:2258-70. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu141.
  28. Ashwal S., Cranford R., Bernat J.L., et al. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state: (First of two parts). N. Engl J. Med. 1994; 330:1499-508.
  29. Estraneo A., Moretta P., Loreto V., et al. Predictors of recovery of responsiveness in prolonged anoxic vegetative state. Neurology 2013;80:464-70. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0f31.
  30. Whyte J., Nakase-Richardson R. Disorders of consciousness: outcomes, comorbidities, and care needs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1851-54. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.003.
  31. Giacino J.T., Kalmar K. The vegetative and minimally conscious states: a comparison of clinical features and functional outcome. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 1997;12:36-51.
  32. Ganesh S., Guernon A., Chalcraft L., et al. Medical comorbidities in disorders of consciousness patients and their association with functional outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1899-907. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.026.
  33. Nakase-Richardson R., McNamee S., Howe L.L., et al. Descriptive characteristics and rehabilitation outcomes in active duty military personnel and veterans with disorders of consciousness with combat- and noncombat-related brain injury Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1861-69. Doi: 10.1016/j. apmr.2013.05.027.

Дополнительные файлы

Доп. файлы
Действие
1. JATS XML
Скачать

© ООО «Бионика Медиа», 2019