Optimization of antibiotic prophylaxis of deep surgical site infection during caesarean section in obese pregnant women


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Background. The study was aimed to the increase the effectiveness of в-lactam antibiotics in pregnant women with obesity by optimizing the intermittent regimen of their administration. Objective. Evaluation of the degree of penetration into the myometrium of cephalosporins and aminopenicillins, recommended in abdominal delivery for antibiotic prophylaxis of endometritis, with a «single dose» in the standard bolus regimen of their administration and in an alternative regimen in the form of an prolonged infusion to optimize the intermittent regimen of administration in patients with grade I obesity. Methods. The study involved 58 pregnant women with grade I obesity, delivered by caesarean section (CS) in a planned manner. For perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (AP), cefazolin, cefuroxime, amoxicillin and ampicillin were used in the bolus regimen and as a prolonged perioperative infusion. The quantitative content of the investigated в-lactam antibiotics in the myometrium was studied using chromatographic and spectrophotometric methods. Results. The routine regimen of AP in CS - intravenous bolus administration of cephalosporins and aminopenicillins 30 minutes before the operation at the recommended dosages - created an effective bactericidal concentration in the myometrium only with the use of cefuroxime. Conclusion. The prolonged perioperative infusion creates higher tissue antibiotic concentrations in the myometrium, providing more reliable antimicrobial protection of the operating wound on the uterus.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Nikolay Korobkov

North-Western State Medical University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov

Email: nikolai_korobkov@mail.rn
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology n.a. S.N. Davydov St. Petersburg, Russia

N. Bakulina

North-Western State Medical University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov

St. Petersburg, Russia

G. Rodionov

All-Russian Center for Emergency and Radiation Medicine n.a. A.M. Nikiforov

St. Petersburg, Russia

E. Kolobova

All-Russian Center for Emergency and Radiation Medicine n.a. A.M. Nikiforov

St. Petersburg, Russia

参考

  1. Серов В.Н., Шмаков Р.Г., Баев О.Р, ТютюнникВ.Л. Кесарево сечение: показания, методы обезболивания, хирургическая техника: клинические рекомендации. 2014. URL: https://mosgorzdrav.ru/uploads/imperavi/ru-RU/018_2014.pdf (Дата обращения: 17.10.2022).
  2. Шмаков Р.Г, Мартиросян С.В., Михайлов А.В. и др. Роды одноплодные, родоразрешение путем кесарева сечения: клинические рекомендации. М., 2021. 106 с. URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/639_1 (Дата обращения: 17.10.2022).
  3. Carlier M, Carrette S., Roberts J.A., et al. Meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam prescribing in critically ill patients: does augmented renal clearance affect pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic target attainment when extended infusions are used? Critical care. 2013;17(3):1-9. doi: 10.1186/cc12705.
  4. Falagas M.E., Tansarli G.S., Ikawa K., et al. Clinical outcomes with extended or continuous versus short-term intravenous infusion of carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:272-82. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis857.
  5. Dulhunty J.M., Roberts J.A., Davis J.S., et al. Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics in severe sepsis: a multicenter double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:236-44. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis856.
  6. Solt I., Frank Wolf M., Michlin R., et al.Intrauterine bacterial growth in elective and non-elective caesarean sections. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;41(5):733-38. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1789959.
  7. Sgayer I., Gur T., Glikman D., et al. Routine uterine culture swab during cesarean section and its clinical correlations: A retrospective comparative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 2020;249:42-6. Doi: 10.1016/j. ejogrb.2020.04.011.
  8. Patel J.B., Cockerill F.R., Bradford PA. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-fifth informational supplement. 2015. Р. 29-50.
  9. Tauzin M., Ouldali N., Bechet S., et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations of cephalosporin use in children. Exp Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2019;15(11):869-80. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2019.1678585.
  10. Mouton J.W., Vinks A.A. Is continuous infusion of в-lactams antibiotics worthwhile? - efficacy and pharmacokinetic considerations. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996;38(1):5-15. Doi: 10.1093/ jac/38.1.5.
  11. Taccone F.S., Cotton F., Roisin, et al. Optimal meropenem concentrations to treat multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa septic shock. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(4):2129-31. Doi: 10.1128/ AAC.06389-11.
  12. van Loon H.J., Vriens M.R., Fluit A.C., et al. Antibiotic rotation and development of gram-negative antibiotic resistance. Am J Respire Critical Care Med. 2005;171(5):480-87. Doi: 10.1164/ rccm.200401-0700C.
  13. Roberts J.A., Kirkpatrick C.M., Roberts M.S., et al. First-dose and steady-state population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin by continuous or intermittent dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;35(2):156-63. Doi: 10.1016/j. ijantimicag.2009.10.008.
  14. Young O.M., Shaik I.H., Twedt R., et al. Pharmacokinetics of cefazolin prophylaxis in obese gravidae at time of cesarean delivery. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2015;213(4):541-e1. Doi: 10.1016/j. ajog.2015.06.034.
  15. Pevzner L., Swank M., Krepel C., et al. Effects of maternal obesity on tissue concentrations of prophylactic cefazolin during cesarean delivery. Obstetr Gynecol. 2011;117(4):877-82. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820b95e4.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2022
##common.cookie##