ETIOLOGY OF MYCOSES IN LOWER EXTREMITY ERYSIPELAS


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To investigate the culture of fungal pathogens of foot and nail mycoses, in patients with lower extremity erysipelas during a follow-up.
Subjects and methods. A group of 36 inpatients from Clinical Infectious Diseases Hospital Two, Moscow Healthcare Department, who had been diagnosed as having moderate lower extremity erysipelas, was found to have concomitant fungal foot and nail infection in 81% of the cases, which necessitated mycological examination 5 months after prior erysipelas.
Results. Foot mycosis was diagnosed in 13 patients; foot and nail mycosis was in 16 patients. Repeated and recurrent erysipelas episodes in the presence of chronic fungal infection were seen in 56% of the cases whereas those in primary erysipelas were in 44%. Mycological examinations of patients with lower extremity erysipelas concurrent with foot and nail mycosis revealed a growth of cultured fungi: Aspergillus in 43% of the cases, Trichophiton in 43%, Candida in 14%, and a combination of Trichophiton rubrum and Aspergillus fumigatus in 20%.
Conclusion. The results of the investigation could identify the culture of fungi in lower extremity erysipelas, which is distinct from the typical pathogens of foot mycoses and onichomycoses and close to a class of fungal pathogens of otomycoses.

About the authors

E G FOKINA

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology, Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and HumanWelfare

Email: e-fokina@yandex.ru <mailto:e-fokina@yandex.ru>
Central Research Institute of Epidemiology, Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and HumanWelfare

S A POTEKAEVA

Clinical Infectious Diseases Hospital Two, Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: svetlana_p2003@inbox.ru <mailto:svetlana_p2003@inbox.ru>
Clinical Infectious Diseases Hospital Two, Moscow Healthcare Department

N G PILIPCHUK

Clinical Infectious Diseases Hospital Two, Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: svetlana_p2003@inbox.ru <mailto:svetlana_p2003@inbox.ru>
Clinical Infectious Diseases Hospital Two, Moscow Healthcare Department

N YU BURENINA

Polyclinic One, Department for Presidential Affairs of the Russian Federation

Email: nybyrenina@yandex.ru <mailto:nybyrenina@yandex.ru>
Polyclinic One, Department for Presidential Affairs of the Russian Federation

References

  1. Еровиченков А.А., Брико Н.И., Малышев Н.А., Потекаева С.А. Клинико-эпидемиологическая характеристика рожи в г. Москве в последние годы. Инфекционные болезни 2015; 1: 46-52.
  2. Еровиченков А.А., Потекаева С.А., Анохина Г.И. Лечение рожи: современные аспекты. Фарматека 2010; 4(198): 48-51.
  3. Шеберстова Н.Б. Клинико-патогенетическое значение гемореологических нарушений у больных рожей. Автореф. дис. ... канд. мед. наук. Иваново-Москва, 2005.
  4. Inghammar M., Rasmussen M., Linder A. Recurrent erysipelas-risk factors and clinical presentation. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014; 14: 270-277.
  5. Chlebicki M.P., Oh C.C. Recurrent cellulitis: risk factors, etiology, pathogenesis and treatment. Curr. Infec. Dis. Rep. 2014; 16(9): 422-422. 6.
  6. Müller D.P., Hoffmann R., Welzel J. Microorganisms of the toe web and their importance for erysipelas of the leg. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2014; 12(8): 691-695.
  7. Eriksson B.K. Anal colonization of group G beta-hemolytic streptococci in relapsing erysipelas of the lower extremity. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1996; 29(5): 1319-1320.
  8. Denis F., Martin C., Ploy M.C. Erysipelas: microbiological and pathogenic data. Ann. Dermatol. Venereol. 2001; 128(3): 317-326.
  9. Bernard P., Risse L., Mounier M., Bonnetblanc J.M. Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus. A severity factor of erysipelas. Ann. Dermatol. Venereol. 1996; 123(1): 12-15.
  10. Хасанов А.Г., Шайбаков Д.Г. О некоторых спорных вопросах рожистого воспаления. Современные проблемы науки и образования 2014; 1 (электронный журнал). <http://www.science-education.ru/115-11908>. Дата обращения 28.04.2015.
  11. Сергеев А.Ю., Сергеев Ю.В. Грибковые инфекции. Руководство для врачей. М.: Бино,. 2003; 185-193.
  12. Саттон Д., Фотергилл А., Ринальди М. Определитель патогенных и условно-патогенных грибов. Пер. с англ. М.: Мир, 2001. 468 с.
  13. Скрипкин Ю.К., Бутов Ю.С. (ред.). Клиническая дерматовенерология. Руководство для врачей. В 2-х т. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2009.
  14. Сергеев А.Ю., ред. Руководство по лабораторной диагностике онихомикозов. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2000. 154 с.
  15. Морозова С.В., Тимурзиева А.Б. Профессиональный взгляд на проблему наружного отита. iDoctor 2015; 3: 8-11.
  16. Крюков А.И., Пальчун В.Т., Лучихин Л.А., Гуров А.В., Магомедов М.М. Наружные отиты. Клинические реко мендации. М.-СПб: Национальная медицинская ассоциация оториноларингологов, 2014. 36 с.
  17. Морозова С.В. Воспалительные заболевания наружного уха. РМЖ 2001; 9(16-17): 699-702.
  18. Кунельская В.Я. Новые подходы к терапии грибкового отита. Вестник оториноларингологии 2004; 2: 46-48.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2015 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies