Efficacy of vaccine prophylaxis of varicella using different tactics for its carrying out


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To assess the effectiveness of varicella vaccination in the Russian Federation in general and in Moscow in particular, a retrospective epidemiological analysis of the incidence of this infection during the pre-vaccination period (from 2006 to 2012) and after the start of vaccination (2013-2017) was carried out. Materials and methods. The data ofForm ofFederal Statistical Monitoring № 2 «Information about infectious and parasitic diseases» and Form of Federal Statistical Monitoring № 5 «Information about preventive vaccinations» were examined. Results. Planned varicella vaccination of children before enrolling in preschool educational organizations, which is held in Moscow in accordance with the regional immunization schedule, helps to reduce morbidity and more effectively affects the epidemic process of varicella than vaccination of risk groups carried out within the national immunization schedule for epidemic indications. It was found that vaccination with incomplete coverage of children aged 3-6 years in Moscow led to a decrease in the varicella incidence among children 3-14 years old, did not affect the incidence rates in adolescents and led to an increase in the incidence in adults with a tendency to increase the incidence of children under 1 year of age. Conclusion. In order to assess the effectiveness of vaccine prophylaxis of varicella in the Russian Federation, it was proposed to organize monitoring and provide vaccination coverage of different age groups in population.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Natliya M. Afonina

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology, Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being

Email: afonina_nat2009@mail.ru
Researcher, Laboratory of Immunoprophylaxis

Irina V. Mikheeva

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology, Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being

Email: Irina_Mikheeva@mail.ru
MD, Head, Laboratory of Immunop rophylaxis; Head, Scientific Metodicheskiy Center of Immunoprophylaxis, Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being

References

  1. Воронин Е.М., Михеева И.В. К вопросу об оценке экономического ущерба от заболеваний, вызываемых вирусом ветряной оспы. В кн.: Профилактическая медицина - практическому здравоохранению. Сб. научных статей МПФ ППО ММА им. И.М.Сеченова. Вып.3. М.: ФЦГЭ Роспотребнадзора, 2007; 259-64.
  2. Шаханина И.Л., Горелов А.В., Лыткина И.Л., Толкушин А.Г. Эконемическая оценка вакцинспроофилактиики ветряной оспы на примере Москвы. Эпидемиол. и инфекц. бол. 2009; (3): 49-57.
  3. Ветряная оспа. Бюллетень «Вакцинация» 2009; (1). http:// www.privivka.ru/ru/expert/bulletin/archive/
  4. Requirements for varicella vaccine (live). WHO Technical Report Series. 1994; (848). http://www.who.int/biologicals/ publications/trs/areas/vaccines/varicella/WHO_ TRS_848_A1.pdf.
  5. CDC. Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. 2007. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/varicella/ index.html
  6. Guric D., Jumaan A.O., Mascola L. at al. Changing Varicella Epidem-dogy in Active Survellamce Sites - United Stetes, 1995- 2005. J. Infect. Dis. 2008; 197(Suppl. 2): S71-5. http://dx.doi. org/10.1086/522156 2.
  7. Вакцина против ветряной оспы и опоясывающего лишая: документ по позиции ВОЗ, июнь 2014.1503. Еженедельный эпидемиологический бюллетень 20 июня 2014 года. 2014; (25): 265-88. http://www.who.int/wer

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Bionika Media