Email this article Some Сomments on Usage of Analytical form -p bar- in the Old Uyghur Language
- Authors: Alieva K.A.1,2
-
Affiliations:
- St. Petersburg State University
- Pushkin Leningrad State University
- Issue: Vol 10, No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 87-95
- Section: Original Papers
- Published: 07.07.2024
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2410-0145/article/view/633142
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.55512/wmo633142
- ID: 633142
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article examines the use of the analytical form -p bar- as a means to express aspectual meanings and the conditions for its use. In the Old Uyghur language, which is considered one of the early stages of development of Turkic languages, morphological means are used to clarify the nature of actions. One of these means is the analytical form -p bar-. In studies on the Old Turkic and Old Uyghur languages, the use of the analytical form -p bar- to express the aspectual meaning of punctual action has not been previously noted. From this point of view, functional characteristics of this form’s use are investigated in the study. Analyzed examples serve as evidence that the Old Uyghur language had grammar means of expressing the aspectual meaning of punctual action.
Keywords
About the authors
Kamilla A. Alieva
St. Petersburg State University; Pushkin Leningrad State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: Kamilla.Alieva95@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2052-6291
Lecturer of the Department of Turkic Philology; Lecturer of the Department of Linguistics and Interpreting
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg; St. PetersburgReferences
- Altun Yarok B01: Text: Altun Yarok B01. Vatec2 — https://vatec2.fkidg1.uni-frankfurt.de/vatecasp/Altun_Yarok_B01.htm (accessed: 13.11.2023).
- BONDARKO, Alexander 1987: Teoriia funktsional’noi grammatiki. Aspektual’nost’. Vremennaia lokalizovannost’. Taksis [Theory of Functional Grammar. Aspectuality. Temporal Localization. Taxis]. Leningrad: Nauka.
- COMRIE, Bernard 1976: Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- ERDAL, Marcel 2004: A Grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden; Boston: Brill.
- GUZEV, Victor G. 2015: Teoreticheskaia grammatika turetskogo iazyka [Theoretical Grammar of the Turkish Language]. Ed. by A.S. Avrutina, N.N. Telitsin. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Publishing House.
- KASHLEVA, Kseniya K. 2015: “K probleme stanovleniia progressivnykh konstruktsyi v nemetskom iazyke” [Progressive Periphrases in German: To the Problem of Their Development]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Ser. 9. 1: 83–92.
- KONONOV, Andrei N. 1980: Grammatika iazyka tiurkskikh runicheskikh pamiatnikov VII–IX vv. [Grammar of the Language of Turkic Runic Monuments of the 7th–9th Centuries]. Leningrad: Nauka, Leningrad Department.
- LINDSTEDT, Jouko 2000: “The Perfect — Aspectual, Temporal and Evidential”. In: Dahl Ö. (ed.). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 365–383.
- MALOV, Sergei E. 1951: Pamyatniki drevneturkskoi pismennosti. Teksty i issledovaniia [Monuments of Old Turkic Script. Texts and Researces]. Moscow; Leningrad: Iadatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.
- NASILOV, Dmitrii D. 1989: Problemy tiurkskoi aspektologii. Aktsional’nost’ [Problems of Turkic aspectology. Actionality]. Leningrad: Nauka, Leningrad Department.
- PLUNGIAN, Vladimir 2011: Vvedenie v grammaticheskuyu semantiku: grammaticheskie znacheniya i grammaticheskie sistemy yazykov mira [Introduction to grammatical semantics: grammatical meanings and grammatical systems of the world’s languages]. Russian State University for the Humanities.
- SHAMINA, Ludmila A. 2013: “Deeprichastnye formy s pokazateliami =p, =a v tuvinskom iazyke” [Adverbial Participles with =п, =а Components in the Tuvinian Language]. Bulletin of NSU. Series: History, philology 12(2): 133–141.
- TELITSIN, Nikolai N. 1994: “O funktsional’nykh osobennostiakh infinitnykh form glagola v tiurkskikh iazykakh” [On the Functional Features of Infinite Verb Forms in Turkic Languages]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Ser. 2. 1(2): 124–127.
- TENISHEV, Edkhyam R. (ed.) 2002: Sravnitel’no-istoricheskaia grammatika tiurkskikh iazykov. Regional’nye rekonstruktsii [Comparative Grammar of Turkic Languages. Regional Reconstructions]. Moscow: Nauka.
- TUGUSHEVA, Leila Yu. 1991: Uigurskaia versiia biografii Siuan’-tszana. Fragmenty iz leningradskogo rukopisnogo sobraniia Instituta vostokovedeniia AN SSSR [Uyghur Version of the Biography of Xuanzang. Fragments from the Leningrad Manuscript Collection of the Institute of Oriental Studies of the USSR Academy of Sciences]. Moscow: Nauka.
- ULMEZOVA, Leila M. 2012: “Kategoriia aspektual’nosti v karachaevo-balkarskom iazyke” [The Category of Aspectuality in the Karachay-Balkar Language]. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Ser. 13. 1: 39–47.
- YULDASHEV, Akhnef 1965: Analiticheskie formy glagola v tiurkskikh iazykakh [Analytical verbals in Turkic Languages]. Moscow: Nauka.
Supplementary files
