Evolution of forms of joint activity: from Fordism to the ecosystem of cooperation
- Авторлар: Nekhoda E.V.1, Roshchina I.V.1, Pan L.1
-
Мекемелер:
- National Research Tomsk State University
- Шығарылым: Том 10, № 9 (2023)
- Беттер: 1331-1352
- Бөлім: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2410-1613/article/view/607837
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18334/et.10.9.118984
- ID: 607837
Дәйексөз келтіру
Аннотация
This article raises questions related to the main trends and driving forces in the evolution of forms of joint activity as a fundamental characteristic of labor. The main transformations in joint activities occur under the influence of a number of factors, the key of which are technological progress and a change in the role of a person in the labor process. Digital technology has contributed to the development of collaborative creative activity and its virtualization, and the formation of new models of labor and employment organization. It is shown that Y and Z generations become the main driving forces of creative activity. The article also raises problems related to the sustainable development of employees in conditions of self-employment, as well as the need to develop new approaches to human resource management in the context of new employment models.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
Evgeniya Nekhoda
National Research Tomsk State University
Email: sheyna1963@yandex.ru
Irina Roshchina
National Research Tomsk State University
Email: riv58@narod.ru
Li Pan
National Research Tomsk State University
Email: 549074437@qq.com
Әдебиет тізімі
- Маркс К. Капитал. Т. 1. / К. Маркс; пер. с нем. С. Алексеева. - М.: Изда-тельство АСТ, 2019. – 261-270 c.
- Нехода Е. В. Социальное развитие человека и изменение представлений о субъекте труда в системе трудовых отношений // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Экономика. – 2008. – № 3 (4). – c. 23-45.
- Люй Цзюнькуй Исследование пути трансформации новых производствен-ных отношений и эволюции рабочей силы в человеческий капитал // Журнал Синьцзянского педагогического университета (издание по философии и общест-венным наукам). – 2014. – № 6. – c. 79-87.
- Henry Hobern, Син Вэнцян История капиталистической оптимизации труда: система Тейлора, Форда и тойотизма // Haidian Economics. – 2008. – № 1. – c. 142-147.
- Се Фушэн, Хуан Лэй Фордизм, неофордизм и постфордизм – эво-люция способа производства в современных развитых капиталистических странах // Преподавание и исследования. – 2005. – № 8. – c. 36-42.
- Krause I. Coworking Space: A Window to the Future of Work? // Foresight and STI Governance. – 2019. – № 2. – p. 52-60.
- Gawer A. Digital Platforms and Ecosystems: Remarks on the Dominant Organizational Forms of the Digital Age // Innovation. – 2022. – № 24(1). – p. 110-124.
- Сюй Хунлин, Ли Шуанхай Модульная эволюция цепочки создания стои-мости и координация с модульной организацией // Индустриальная экономика Китая. – 2005. – № 11. – c. 81-88.
- Arcidiacono D., Borghi P., Ciarini A. Platform work: from digital promises to labour challenges. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://iris.uniroma1.it/retrieve/handle/11573/1360051/1354686/Introduzione%20Paco_Arcidiacono_Borghi_Ciarini.pdf (дата обращения: 03.08.2023).
- Batmunkh, Altanshagai, Maria Fekete-Farkas, and Zoltan Lakner. 2022. Bibli-ometric Analysis of Gig Economy. Administrative Sciences 12: 51
- Fu X., Avenyo E., Ghauri P. Digital platforms and development: a survey of the literature // Innovation and Development. – 2021. – № 11(2-3). – p. 303-321.
- Wood A J, Graham M, Lehdonvirta V, et al. (2019) Good gig, bad gig: auton-omy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. J. Work, Employment and So-ciety, 33(1): 56-75
- Kwok R. Flexible working: Science in the gig economy // Nature. – 2017. – № 550(7676). – p. 419-421.
- Kolade, O., Owoseni, A. (2022). Employment 5.0: The work of the future and the future of work. Technology in Society, 102086
- Kolesnichenko, E. A., Radyukova, Y. Y., Pakhomov, N. N. (2019). The role and importance of knowledge economy as a platform for formation of industry 4.0. In Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century (pp. 73-82). Springer, Cham
- Clifton, N., Füzi, A., Loudon, G. (2019). Coworking in the digital economy: Context, motivations, and outcomes. Futures, 102439
- Toffler, A., 2022. The third wave: The classic study of tomorrow. Bantam
- McCann P. Globalization and economic geography: The world is curved, not flat Cambridge // Journal of Regions Economy and Society. – 2008. – № 1 (3). – p. 351-370.
- Liu H., Li, X., Wang S. A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of plat-form research: Developing the research agenda for platforms, the associated technolo-gies and social impacts // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. – 2021. – № 169. – p. 120827.
- Kost D., Fieseler C., Wong S. I. Boundaryless careers in the gig economy: An oxymoron? // Human Resource Management Journal. – 2020. – № 30(1). – p. 100-113.
- Черников Б.В. Трансформация системы трудовых ценностей в условиях формирования новой парадигмы труда // Вестник Томского государственного уни-верситета. Экономика. – 2014. – № 3 (27). – c. 45-53.