The Peculiarities of Legislative Regulation and the Problems of Qualification of Evasion from the Performance of Duties on the Repatriation of Funds

封面


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

This article analyzes the peculiarities of legislative regulation and the problems of qualification of the corpus delicti (criminal offense) provided in Article 193 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Evasion of obligations to repatriate funds in foreign currency or currency of the Russian Federation.” Considering the background of the development of legal frameworks for currency transactions changes in approach to determining substantial damages resulting from the actions related to the non-repatriation of funds associated with capital outflows, and the emergence of new forms of participation in civil transactions, the noted criminal offense is revisited from the context of the legal landscape of monetary regulation. Additionally, the effectiveness of law enforcement is compromised due to the unclear delineation of the criteria for the objective elements and the involved parties as stipulated in the legal provisions. Analyzing these criteria in the context of judicial precedents, legislative regulation, and scholarly doctrine has enabled us to draw conclusions vital for accurately categorizing actions falling within the framework of the specified criminal offense. Simultaneously, it is deduced that addressing the problems identified in this study can only be achieved with a systematic change in the approach to countering the evasion of repatriating funds.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Denis Pechegin

The Institute of legislation and comparative law under the government of the Russian Federation

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: crim5@izak.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6499-9966
SPIN 代码: 1020-5326
Scopus 作者 ID: 57204679118
Researcher ID: C-1067-2017

candidate of legal sciences, leading researcher

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Kucherov II. Valyutnoe pravo Rossii (akademicheskii kurs lektsii). Moscow: Yustitsinform, 2011. (In Russ.).
  2. Lisitsyn AYu. Valyutno-pravovoi rezhim v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Reformy i pravo. 2010;(1):3–12. (In Russ.).
  3. Lisitsyn AYu. Effektivnost’ sistemy valyutno-pravovogo regulirovaniya vneshnetorgovoi deyatel’nosti. Reformy i pravo. 2010;(4):7–10. (In Russ.).
  4. Bel’skii KS. K voprosu o ponyatii denezhnoi sistemy Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Finansovoe pravo. 2005;(8):3–6. (In Russ.).
  5. Sobolev MN. Ocherki finansovoi nauki. Moscow: Proletarii; 1925. (In Russ.).
  6. Kucherov II. Zakonnye platezhnye sredstva: teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie. Moscow: Institut zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel’stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii; 2016. (In Russ.).
  7. Lindert PKh. Ekonomika mirokhozyaistvennykh svyazei. Moscow: Progress; 1992. (In Russ.).
  8. Kucherov II. Sovremennoe sostoyanie ugolovno-pravovoi zashchity sfery valyutnogo regulirovaniya. Rossiiskii sledovatel’. 2011;(1):23–26. (In Russ.).
  9. Karpovich OG. Prestupleniya, posyagayushchie na valyutnyi kontrol’ Rossiiskoi Federatsii: st. 193 UK RF. Vneshnetorgovoe pravo. 2011;(1):24–28. (In Russ.).
  10. Lapshin VF, Kuznetsova NV. O perspektivakh razvitiya ugolovnogo zakonodatel’stva stran Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza, obespechivayushchego okhranu natsional’nykh interesov v sfere vneshneekonomicheskoi deyatel’nosti. Bezopasnost’ biznesa. 2021;(1):21–25. (In Russ.).
  11. Yani PS. Neopredelennost’ ugolovnogo zakona porozhdaet nerazreshimye problemy pravoprimeneniya. Zakonnost’. 2020;(6(1028)):32–37. (In Russ.).
  12. Kameneva AN. Obshchestvenno opasnye posledstviya v normakh o prestupleniyakh v sfere ekonomicheskoi deyatel’nosti: problemy otrazheniya v zakone. Lex russica. 2020;(5):53–63. (In Russ.).
  13. Nudel’ SL. Ugolovno-pravovoe vozdeistvie v mekhanizme obespecheniya ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti (problemy i tendentsii zakonodatel’noi reglamentatsii). Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2020;(6):106–119. (In Russ.).
  14. Kurakin AV, Sukharenko AN. Sovremennye ugolovno-pravovye sredstva neitralizatsii ugroz ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti Rossii. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2020;(11):18–20. (In Russ.).
  15. Dikanova TA. O sostoyanii prestupnosti v tamozhennoi sfere v 2015–2019 godakh. Rossiiskii sledovatel’. 2020;(9):71–76. (In Russ.).
  16. Lyaskalo AN. Sub”ekt valyutnykh prestuplenii. Ugolovnyi protsess. 2017;(9):44–50. (In Russ.).
  17. Gaukhman LD, Maksimov SV. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana finansovoi sredy: novye vidy prestuplenii i ikh kvalifikatsiya. Moscow: Uchebno-konsul’tatsionnyi Tsentr Yurinform; 1995. (In Russ.).
  18. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost’ (ugolovno-pravovye mekhanizmy obespecheniya). Ed. by I.I. Kucherov, O.A. Zaitsev, S.L. Nudel’. Moscow: Institut zakonodatel’stva i sravnitnitel’nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel’stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii; 2021. (In Russ.).
  19. Nudel’ SL. Modernizatsiya ugolovnoi politiki: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2023;27(1):5–22. (In Russ.).

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig.1.

下载 (164KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig.2.

下载 (152KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2023

许可 URL: https://eco-vector.com/en/for_authors.php#07

##common.cookie##