Life quality and prognosis of patients with adverse post-infarction left ventricle remodeling

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Abstract. Chronic heart failure (CHF) is one of the most common complications of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to pathological or adverse post-infarction remodeling of the left ventricle. At the same time, the subjective estimation of well-being and long-term prognosis of patients with different variants of such remodeling are remaining unclear.

The aim: to study the dynamics of life quality and prognosis in patients after STEMI with adverse left ventricular remodeling (ALVR) and without it.

Material and methods. 141 patients with STEMI aged 51 (45; 58) years was included into the study. Their quality of life was assessed on days 7–9 and after 24 and 48 weeks using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and Minnesota Questionnaire (MLHFQ). According to the results of echocardiography, ALVR was diagnosed in cases when the end-diastolic volume index increased by ≥ 20% and/or end-systolic volume index increased by ≥ 15% at 24 weeks comparatively to the values on days 7–9. Endpoints (cardiac surgery, recurrent MI) were registering during 96 weeks of observation.

Results. 125 patients (88.7%) have passed through observation. After 24 weeks they were divided into groups: 1st – 63 persons with ALVR (“ALVR”), 2nd – 62 persons without signs of ALVR (“No ALVR”). According to VAS data, in “ALVR” group, the subjective assessment of well-being improved by 5,2% (p0–48 = 0.045) only after 48 weeks. In group 2, by the intermediate visit the increase in this parameter reached 6.8% comparatively to the initial level (p0–24 = 0.001), and at the end of the observation it was 6.7% (p0–48 = 0.001). At the same time, VAS values differed in the comparison groups both after 24 and 48 weeks (р1–2 < 0.01). When analyzing the results of MLHFQ, a progressive worsening of CHF symptoms was found in both groups. In group 1, the end points within 96 weeks were detected in 13 (20.6%), in the 2nd group – in 2 (3.2%) patients. Odds ratio for an unfavorable outcome in ALVR was 7,8 (95% CI: 1.7–36.2) (p = 0.003) comparatively with “No ALVR” group.

Conclusion. Obtained results confirm the importance of timely diagnosis of ALVR for the purpose of adequate correction of anti-remodeling pharmacotherapy to improve the life quality and prognosis of STEMI patients.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Lyudmila I. Salyamova

Penza State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: l.salyamova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7130-0316

MD, PhD (Medicine), associate professor at the Department of therapy, Penza State University

Russian Federation, Penza

Olga G. Kvasova

Penza State University

Email: olhakvasova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7008-6995

MD, PhD (Medicine), senior lecturer at the Department of therapy, Penza State University

Russian Federation, Penza

Inna A. Babkina

Penza State University

Email: innalevina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3845-0854

MD, postgraduate student of the Department of therapy, Penza State University

Russian Federation, Penza

Vladislav V. Rymar

S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation

Email: vlad1rymar@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3888-1750

6th year cadet of S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Погосова Н.В., Юферева Ю.М., Соколова О.Ю. Качество жизни больных тремя формами ишемической болезни сердца: состояние проблемы, методы оценки, взаимосвязь с психологическим статусом и прогностическое значение. Профилактическая медицина. 2015; 18(6): 97–104. [Pogosova N.V., Iufereva Iu.M., Sokolova O.Iu. Quality of life in patients with three forms of coronary heart disease: Status of the problem, assessment methods, relationship to psychological status, and prognostic value. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina = The Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2015; 18(6): 97–104 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed201518697-104. EDN: VLJBQL.
  2. Simoes C., Santos S., Claes C. Quality of life assessment in intellectual disabilities: The Escala Pessoal de Resultados versus the World Health Quality of Life-BREF. Res Dev Disabil. 2015; 37: 171–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.11.010. PMID: 25481536.
  3. Жиров И.В., Сафронова Н.В., Терещенко С.Н. Хроническая сердечная недостаточность как осложнение инфаркта миокарда: рациональная фармакотерапия. Клинический случай. Consilium Medicum. 2022; 24(10): 732–740. [Zhirov I.V., Safronova N.V., Tereshchenko S.N. Heart failure as a complication of myocardial infarction: Rational therapy. Case report. Consilium Medicum. 2022; 24(10): 732–740 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.26442/20751753.2022.10.201888. EDN: OMAKQY.
  4. Аверков О.В., Дупляков Д.В., Гиляров М.Ю. с соавт. Острый инфаркт миокарда с подъемом сегмента ST электрокардиограммы. Клинические рекомендации 2020. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2020; 25(11): 251–310. [Averkov O.V., Duplyakov D.V., Gilyarov M.Yu. et al. 2020 Clinical practice guidelines for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Rossiyskiy kardiologicheskiy zhurnal = Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020; 25(11): 251–310 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.15829/29/1560-4071-2020-4103. EDN: KNQWWK.
  5. Jenca D., Melenovsky V., Stehlik J. et al. Heart failure after myocardial infarction: Incidence and predictors. ESC Heart Fail. 2021; 8(1): 222–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13144. PMID: 33319509. PMCID: PMC7835562.
  6. Драгунов Д.О., Соколова А.В., Арутюнов Г.П. с соавт. Качество жизни у пациентов с сердечной недостаточностью с сохраненной фракцией выброса и симптомом бендопноэ. Кардиология. 2019; 59(S6): 24–32. [Dragunov D.O., Sokolova A.V., Arutyunov G.P. et al. Quality of life in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and the bendopnea symptom. Kardiologiya = Cardiology. 2019; 59(S6): 24–32 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2507. EDN: ADELJU.
  7. Ravera A., Santema B.T., Sama I.E. et al. Quality of life in men and women with heart failure: association with outcome, and comparison between the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Question-naire and the EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021; 23(4): 567–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2154. PMID: 33728762. PMCID: PMC8252457.
  8. Leanca S.A., Crisu D., Petris A.O. et al. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: From physiopathology to treatment. Life (Basel). 2022; 12(8): 1111. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12081111. PMID: 35892913. PMCID: PMC9332014.
  9. Frantz S., Hundertmark M.J., Schulz-Menger J. et al. Left ventricular remodelling post-myocardial infarction: Pathophysiology, imaging, and novel therapies. Eur Heart J. 2022; 43(27): 2549–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac223. PMID: 35511857. PMCID: PMC9336586.
  10. Шляхто Е.В., Звартау Н.Э., Виллевальде С.В. с соавт. Значимость оценки распространенности и мониторинга исходов у пациентов с сердечной недостаточностью в России. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2020; 25(12): 146–154. [Shlyakhto E.V., Zvartau N.E., Villevalde S.V. et al. Assessment of prevalence and monitoring of outcomes in patients with heart failure in Russia. Rossiyskiy kardiologicheskiy zhurnal = Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020; 25(12): 146–154 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4204. EDN: DJVEYP.
  11. Сулейманов Ю.С. Динамика качества жизни пациентов после стационарного лечения по поводу острого инфаркта миокарда с экстренно проведенной ЧТКА и стентированием коронарных артерий. Бюллетень медицинских интернет-конференций. 2022; 12(4): 86–91. [Suleymanov Yu.S. Dynamics of the quality of life of patients after inpatient treatment for acute myocardial infarction with emergency PTCA and coronary artery stenting. Byulleten’ meditsinskikh internet-konferentsiy = Bulletin of Medical Internet Conferences. 2022; 12(4): 86–91 (In Russ.)]. EDN: CZDHDP.
  12. Драпкина О.М., Бойцов С.А., Омельяновский В.В. с соавт. Социально-экономический ущерб, обусловленный хронической сердечной недостаточностью, в Российской Федерации. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2021; 26(6): 81–89. [Drapkina O.M., Boytsov S.A., Omelyanovskiy V.V. et al. Socio-economic impact of heart failure in Russia. Rossiyskiy kardiologicheskiy zhurnal = Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021; 26(6): 81–89 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4490. EDN: PUEROH.
  13. Khajavi A., Moshki M., Minaee S. et. al. Chronic heart failure health-related quality of life questionnaire (CHFQOLQ-20): Development and psychometric properties. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023; 23(1): 165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03197-9. PMID: 36991337. PMCID: PMC10061999.
  14. Терещенко С.Н., Галявич А.С., Ускач Т.М. с соавт. Хроническая сердечная недостаточность. Клинические рекомендации 2020. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2020; 25(11): 311–374. [Tereshchenko S.N., Galyavich A.S., Uskach T.M. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for chronic heart failure. Rossiyskiy kardiologicheskiy zhurnal = Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020; 25(11): 311–374 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2020-4083. EDN: LJGGQV.
  15. Lins L., Carvalho F.M. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review. SAGE Open Med. 2016; (4): 2050312116671725. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312116671725. PMID: 27757230. PMCID: PMC5052926.
  16. Doll J.A., Tang F., Cresci S. et al. Change in angina symptom status after acute myocardial infarction and its association with readmission risk: An analysis of the Translational Research Investigating Underlying Dis-parities in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients’ Health Status (TRIUMPH) Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5(6): e003205. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003205. PMID: 27412898. PMCID: PMC4937266.
  17. Pujowaskito P., Dwi Lazuardi Emha D., Fiddiyanti I., Bunawan R. Quality of life comparison in STEMI patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and NonPCI in Dustira Hospital. Adv Health Sci Res. 2021; 37: 266–78. https://doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.210723.061.
  18. Xu J., Sun Y., Gong D. et al. Association between disease-specific health-related quality of life and all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure: A meta-analysis. Curr Probl Cardio. 2023; 48(4): 101592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101592. PMID: 36632931.
  19. Клинические рекомендации. Хроническая сердечная недостаточность. Общероссийская общественная организация «Российское кардиологическое общество», автономная некоммерческая организация «Национальное общество по изучению сердечной недостаточности и заболеваний миокарда», общероссийская общественная организация «Общество специалистов по сердечной недостаточности». Рубрикатор клинических рекомендаций Минздрава России. 2020. ID: 156. Доступ: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/156_1 (дата обращения – 11.01.2024). [Clinical guidelines. Chronic heart failure. Russian Cardiological Society, National Society for the Study of Heart Failure and Myocardial Diseases, Society of Heart Failure Specialists. Rubricator of clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia. 2020. ID: 156. URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/156_1 (date of access – 11.01.2024) (In Russ.)].
  20. Galli A., Lombardi F. Postinfarct left ventricular remodelling: A prevailing cause of heart failure. Cardiol Res Pract. 2016; 2016: 2579832. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2579832. PMID: 26989555. PMCID: PMC4775793.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Dynamics of left ventricular ejection fraction in comparison groups

Download (467KB)
3. Fig. 2. Dynamics of the quality of life of the studied patients according to the Seattle Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) in the comparison groups

Download (432KB)
4. Fig. 3. Dynamics of chronic heart failure symptoms according to the Minnesota Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and the Clinical Patient Assessment Scale (CPS) in the comparison groups

Download (300KB)
5. Fig. 4. Dynamics of the results of the 6-minute walk test in the comparison groups

Download (193KB)
6. Fig. 5. Frequency of adverse events in the comparison groups

Download (238KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies