Cochrane evidence - health and medical education


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

In an editorial on the current topic - treatment and prevention of new coronavirus infection, the rationale for using evidence from Cochrane Systematic Reviews to make evidence-informed decisions in practical medicine is justified. The editorial refers to the results of a recent Cochrane Review on chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19, which concludes that hydroxychloroquine does not reduce mortality from COVID-19 and does not reduce the need for mechanical ventilation, with more adverse effects than placebo.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Lilia Ziganshina

Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia; Cochrane Russia

Email: rmapo@rmapo.ru; lezign@gmail.com
MD, professor, leading coordinator of the Center for evidence-based medical knowledge broadcasting of the institute of professional development methodology, professor of the Department of epidemiology; Director 125993, Moscow, 2/1 build. 1 Barrikadnaya Str

Elena Malinnikova

Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia

Email: malinacgb@mail.ru
MD, professor, head of the Department of virology 125993, Moscow, 2/1 build. 1 Barrikadnaya Str

Anatoly Stremoukhov

Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia

Email: rmapo@rmapo.ru; astremo@bk.ru
MD, professor, Director the Institute of professional development methodology, head of the Department of general medical practice and outpatient therapy 125993, Moscow, 2/1 build. 1 Barrikadnaya Str

参考

  1. Chalmers I., Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009; 374(9683): 86-89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9.
  2. Macleod M.R., Michie S., Roberts I. et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet. 2014; 383(9912): 101-04. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62329-6.
  3. Glasziou P., Altman D.G., Bossuyt P. et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet. 2014; 383(9913): 267-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X.
  4. Lund H., Brunnhuber K., Juhl C. et al. Towards evidence based research. BMJ. 2016; 355: i5440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5440.
  5. Lund H., Juhl C. Doing meaningful systematic reviews is no gravy train. Lancet. 2020; 395(10241): 1905. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30172-0.
  6. Lund H., Juhl C.B., Norgaard B. et al. Evidence-based research series-paper 2: Using an evidence-based research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 129: 158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.019.
  7. Lund H., Juhl C.B., Norgaard B. et al. Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 3: Using an evidence-based research approach to place your results into context after the study is performed to ensure usefulness of the conclusion. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 129: 167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.021.
  8. Useem J., Brennan A., LaValley M. et al. Systematic differences between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane meta-analyses on the same topic: A matched pair analysis. PLoS One. 2015; 10(12): e0144980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144980.
  9. Koletsi D., Fleming P.S., Michelaki I., Pandis N. Heterogeneity in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses in orthodontics. J Dent. 2018; 74: 90-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.05.003.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2021
##common.cookie##