PHASE COMPOSITION, CRYSTALLINE AND NANOSTRUCTURE OF THE BFO/SBN/MgO(001)
- Autores: Stryukov D.V1, Matyash Y.Y.1, Pavlenko A.V1
-
Afiliações:
- Federal Research Centre the Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Edição: Volume 18, Nº 2 (2022)
- Páginas: 19-24
- Seção: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2500-0640/article/view/628038
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S25000640220203
- ID: 628038
Citar
Texto integral
Acesso aberto
Acesso está concedido
Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes
Resumo
The BiFeO3/Sr0.6Ba0.4Nb2O6 two-layer heterostructure have been sputtered onto a (001)MgO single-crystal substrate by high-frequency sputtering in an oxygen atmosphere. The layers of the heterostructure were obtained epitaxially, where the lower Sr0.6Ba0.4Nb2O6 layer was obtained with the formation of two types of orientational domains, and the upper BiFeO3 layer was obtained in the full parallel orientation ratio with the substrate. According to atomic force microscopy the surface of the heterostructure is a block structure with a low value of the root-mean-square surface roughness. The study of magnetic force microscopy of the heterostructure surface showed the presence of a response at the grain boundaries associated only with the BiFeO3 layer. The causes of the revealed effects are discussed.
Palavras-chave
Sobre autores
D. Stryukov
Federal Research Centre the Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of SciencesRostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
Ya. Matyash
Federal Research Centre the Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of SciencesRostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
A. Pavlenko
Federal Research Centre the Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: tolik_260686@mail.ru
Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
Bibliografia
- Nan C.W., Bichurin M.I., Dong S., Viehland D., Srinivasan G. 2008. Multiferroic magnetoelectric composites: Historical perspective, status, and future directions. Journal of Applied Physics. 103(3): 031101. doi: 10.1063/1.2836410
- Rivera J.-P., Schmid H. 1997. On the birefringence of magnetoelectric BiFeO3. Ferroelectrics. 204(1): 23–33. doi: 10.1080/00150199708222185
- Kumar A., Rai R.C., Podraza N.J., Denev S., Ramirez M., Chu Y.-H., Martin L.W., Ihlefeld J., Heeg T., Schubert J., Schlom D.G., Orenstein J., Ramesh R., Collins R.W., Musfeldt J.L., Gopalan V. 2008. Linear and nonlinear optical properties of BiFeO3. Applied Physics Letters. 92: 121915. doi: 10.1063/1.2901168
- Catalan G., Scott J.F. 2009. Physics and applications of bismuth ferrite. Advanced Materials. 21(24): 2463–2485. doi: 10.1002/adma.200802849
- Wang J., Neaton J.B., Zheng H., Nagarajan V., Ogale S.B., Liu B., Viehland D., Vaithyanathan V., Schlom D.G., Waghmare U.V., Spaldin N.A., Rabe K.M., Wuttig M., Ramesh R. 2003. Epitaxial BiFeO3 multiferroic thin film heterostructures. Science. 299:1719–1722. doi: 10.1126/science.1080615
- Li D., Gariglio S., Cancellieri C., Fête A., Stornaiuolo D., Triscone J.-M. 2014. Fabricating superconducting interfaces between artificially grown LaAlO3 and SrTiO3 thin films. APL Materials. 2(1): 012102. doi: 10.1063/1.4854335
- Oja R., Tyunina M., Yao L., Pinomaa T., Kocourek T., Dejneka A., Stupakov O., Jelinek M., Trepakov V., van Dijken S., Nieminen R.M. 2012. d0 ferromagnetic interface between nonmagnetic perovskites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(12): 127207. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.127207
- Павленко А.В., Стрюков Д.В., Ивлева Л.И., Ковтун А.П., Жидель К.М., Лыков П.А. 2021. Структурные характеристики выращенных методом RF-катодного напыления тонких пленок Sr0.61Ba0.39Nb2O6/ MgO(001). Физика твердого тела. 63(2): 250–254. doi: 10.21883/FTT.2021.02.50473.174
- Павленко А.В., Стрюков Д.В. 2018. Структура, фазовые переходы и диэлектрические характеристики сегнетоэлектрика-релаксора SBN-75. Наука Юга России. 14(4): 29–34. doi: 10.7868/S25000640180404
- Гареева З.В., Калякин Л.А., Каюмов И.Р., Звездин А.К. 2020. Спин-переориентационные переходы в мультиферроиках с циклоидальным спиновым упорядочением. Физика металлов и металловедение. 121(4): 352–358. doi: 10.31857/S0015323020040038
Arquivos suplementares
