THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENTIFIC BASIS OF MARINE NATURAL RESOURCE USE


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The paper discusses the development of scientific basis of marine natural resource use. The authors believe that rational marine environmental management requires an adequate understanding of features that reflect changes in the functioning of marine ecosystems under changing natural conditions and the growing pressure of anthropogenic impacts. A fundamental understanding of the phenomena and processes occurring in the seas and oceans is necessary for the transition to such marine use. The authors try to answer the following questions: what is the main object of management in marine use; what is the integrated management of the marine ecosystem; what is the essence of the ecosystem approach in marine use; what is the range of tools included in the economic component of rational marine use. The analysis carried out in the article allowed the authors to formulate the most promising tools for ensuring sustainable and environmentally safe development of the marine economy. It includes: integrated management of marine activities using an ecosystem approach, marine spatial planning, application of a precautionary approach in planning marine activities aimed at reducing environmental risks in areas of extreme climatic conditions, assessment of marine ecosystem services in the system of management decisions in marine use. The authors conclude that the improvement of these tools should be the goal of scientific research to create a theory of marine environmental management.

作者简介

G. Matishov

Federal Research Centre the Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Murmansk Marine Biological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: matishov_ssc-ras@ssc-ras.ru
Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation; Murmansk, Russian Federation

G. Titova

St Petersburg Scientific Research Center for Ecological Safety of the Russian Academy of Sciences

St Petersburg, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Титова Г.Д. 2012. Проблемы становления экономики морских экосистем. Вестник Российской академии естественных наук (Санкт-Петербург). 16(2): 120–124.
  2. Матишов Г.Г, Денисов В.В., Дженюк С.Л. 2007. Интегрированное управление природопользованием в шельфовых морях. Известия Российской академии наук. Серия географическая. 3: 27–40.
  3. Матишов Г.Г. 2013. Современное состояние биоресурсов и экологическая ситуация в морях Западной Арктики. pandia.ru. URL: https://pandia.ru/text/77/465/8765.php (дата обращения: 18.10.2020).
  4. Котляков В.М. 2001. Избранные сочинения. Книга 3. География в меняющемся мире. М., Наука: 411 с.
  5. Sherman K., Duda A.M. 1999. Large marine ecosystems: an emerging paradigm for fishery sustainability. Fisheries. 24(12): 15–26. doi: 10.1577/1548-8446(1999)024<0015:LME>2.0.CO;2
  6. Всемирная xартия природы. 1982. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/charter_for_nature.shtml (дата обращения: 18.10.2020).
  7. Титова Г.Д., Родионов В.З. 2017. Современные принципы реализации экосистемного подхода в морском планировании. Региональная экология. 3(49): 17–23.
  8. Scientific Consensus Statement on Marine Ecosystem-Based Management (signed by 221 academic scientists and policy experts with relevant expertise). 2005. Washington, DC, Island Press: 21 p.
  9. Marine planning. 2011. URL: http://www.parliament.uk/documents/post/postpn388_Marine-Planning.pdf (дата обращения: 18.10.2020).
  10. UNEP medium term strategy 2018–2021. URL: http://hdl. handle.net/20.500.11822/7621 (дата обращения: 18.10.2020).
  11. Costanza R., Daly H.E. 1992. Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology. 6(1): 37–46.
  12. TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature. A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. 2010. Malta, Progress Press: 36 p.
  13. Kettunen M., Vihervaara P., Kinnunen S., D’Amato D., Badura T., Argimon M., Ten Brink P. 2012. Socio-economic importance of ecosystem services in the Nordic Countries. Synthesis in the context of The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB). Copenhagen, Nordic Council of Ministers: 290 p.
  14. Титова Г.Д. 2014. Понятие «природный капитал», развитие методологии и методов его экономической оценки. Вестник СПбГУ. Серия 7. Геология. География. 1: 114–124.
  15. Reviving the Ocean Economy: the Case for Action-2015. 2015. Gland, Geneva, WWF International: 60 p.
  16. Данилов-Данильян В.И. 2010. Экологические ценности и экономические оценки. В кн.: Экономика экосистем и биоразнообразия: потенциал и перспективы стран Северной Евразии: Материалы совещания TEEB – экономика экосистем и биоразнообразия: перспективы участия России и других стран ННГ (Москва, 24 февраля 2010 г.). М., изд-во Центра охраны живой природы: 19–26.
  17. Marine Ecosystem Services Partnership. URL: http://www. marineecosystemservices.org/ (дата обращения: 18.10.2020).
  18. План действий ООН по защите живой природы на 10 лет принят в Нагое. URL: http://ecoportal.su/news.php?id=49562 (дата обращения: 18.10.2020).
  19. OECD. 2016. The Ocean Economy in 2030. Paris, OECD Publishing: 256 p. doi: 10.1787/9789264251724-en

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Издательство «Наука», 2020

##common.cookie##