Adoption as a Priority form of Placement of Children Left Without Parental Care: New in Legal Regulation and Development Prospects

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Purpose of the study. In the article, the author examines the trends in the development of legislation on adoption as a priority form of placement of children left without parental care, identifies the advantages of this form and the prospects for its development. The author comes to the conclusion that there is no unified definition of the concept of adoption in the law at the present stage of development of family legislation, the criteria for distinguishing between the «form of arrangement» and the «form of education» of a child are proposed, the essence and social purpose of the institution of adoption are systematized, the advantages of the judicial order are systematized and the requirements for to prospective adoptive parents. The article proves the practical need in some cases to apply a situational method of regulating relations for the adoption of a child, which will allow deviating from the formal requirements of the legislator in relation to candidates for adoptive parents, provided that the adoption is in the interests of the child.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Natalia Letova

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: letovanv@mail.ru
Dr. Sci. (Law), Chief Researcher of the Procedural Law Sector Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Alekseev S.S. General theory of law. M., 2002.
  2. Yakimov A.Yu. The status of the subject of law (theoretical issues) // State and law. 2003. No. 4. P. 9.
  3. H. Reinprecht. Education without limits. Translation by N. Bruskova. Protect me. 2004. No. 3.
  4. Obukhovsky K. Psychology of human drives. M., 1972.
  5. Deryabina O. Become a parent. // Family and school, 1994, No. 12.
  6. Bekhterev V.M. Collective reflexology. M. 1921.
  7. Gozman L.Ya. Processes of interpersonal perception in the family // Interpersonal perception in the group. M., 1981.
  8. Matskovsky M.S. Sociology of the family: problems, theories, methodologies and techniques. M., 1989.
  9. Golovkin R.B. Cancellation of adoption in the legal and psychological aspect: domestic and international experience / R.B. Golovkin, K.A. Shumova // Bulletin of science and practice. 2018. N 12. P. 553-559.
  10. Levushkin A.N. Protection of the rights of children during adoption (adoption) in the Russian Federation: problems of theory and practice / A.N. Levushkin // Modern Law. 2011. N 6.
  11. Levushkin A.N. Directions for improving the Family Code of the Russian Federation / A.N. Levushkin // Family and housing law. 2018. N 1. P. 55-57.
  12. Levushkin A.N. Legal consequences of adoption and secrecy of adoption / A.N. Levushkin // Russian justice. 2011. N 6. P. 24-27.
  13. Semenova E.A. Problems of differentiation of grounds for cancellation of adoption / E.A. Semenova // Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy. 2016. No. 2 (109). pp. 209-215.
  14. Latysheva N.A. Some features of record keeping in the courts of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus when considering cases of adoption (adoption) of a child // Arbitration and civil process, 2022, N 3.
  15. Izmailov V.V. Legal nature and some problems of adoption during the period of reforming the family legislation of Russia // Family and Housing Law», 2021, N 2.
  16. Letova N.V. Adoption in the Russian Federation: legal problems. M, 2006.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML