Heterogeneity of Russia's Economic Space: Factors, Forms of Manifestation, and Tools for Eliminating Excessive Disproportions

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

In the article, the author analyzes the spatial heterogeneity of Russia in terms of differences in competitiveness, viewed through the prism of the ratio of production volumes of high value-added goods and services to the production volumes of low value-added products. An assessment of the difference in the level of returns from these factors is given. The features of the existing settlement system and its changes are analyzed. Taking into account these factors, a typology of Russian regions and targeted tools for managing spatial development are proposed, aimed at reducing excessive spatial disproportions. The foreign practices of reducing the excessive heterogeneity of the economic space are summarized.

Sobre autores

Tatyana Koteikina

Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Pyatigorsk State University»

Email: kasaeva@pgu.ru
Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Director of the Institute for the Training of Highly Qualified Personnel Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation

Bibliografia

  1. Rural Well-being: Geography of opportunities. OECD Country notes. URL: https://www.oecd.org/regional/rural-wellbeing-d25cef80-en.htm (27.12.2021).
  2. EMISS State Statistics-Access mode: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/42928
  3. Problems and prospects of socio-economic development of rural areas: regional aspect.-Moscow: State Duma Edition, 2021;
  4. Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators. 2021: Stat.sat./ Rosstat.-M., 2021.
  5. The strategy of "Aggressive infrastructure development".-News agency "Construction Business". Access: http://ancb.ru/files/ck/1618305869_Husnullin_i_Plan_ Mishustina.pdf (checked 05.02.2022)
  6. Strategy of sustainable development of rural areas of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030. Approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No.151-r dated February 2, 2015 [Electronic resource]-Access mode: http://static.government.ru/media/files/Fw1kbNXVJxQ.pdf
  7. Alain de Janvry and Elisabeth Sadoulet. Toward a territorial approach to rural development // Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics. Vol. 4, No. 1, 2007, pp. 66-98.
  8. Bekir Demirtas, Aybüke Kaya Evaluation of Public Agricultural Extension Programs: The Case of Hatay Province (Turkey) // Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi 5(2): 203-210, 2018 https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/turkjans/issue/36895/421369.
  9. Borts G. H., Stein J. I. Economic Crowth in a Free Market. New York, London, 1964.
  10. Christaller W. 1933. Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland: Eine ökonomisch-geographische Untersuchung über die Gesetzmässigkeit der Verbreitung und Entwicklung der Siedlungen mit städtischen Funktionen. Jena: G. Fischer. 331 p.
  11. Friedmann, J. (1966). Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela. MIT Press, 279 р.
  12. Granberg L., Peltonen M. Peasantisation and beyond in Finland and Scandinavia // Europe’s Green Ring (Perspectives on Rural Policy and Planning) / L. Granberg, I. Kovach, H. Tovey (eds.). Wiltshire, Anthony Rowe Ltd.: Ashgate, 2001. Pp. 285-305.
  13. Hyyryläinen T. Governance of local empowerment in Finnish rural policy: Collaboration between policy, development and research // Employment Policy Research Center. EPRC. Hirosaki University, Japan. Discussion Paper. 2010. №4. p.9; 22.
  14. Krugman P. Complex landscapes in economic geography / Р. Krugman // American Economic Association, Papers and Proceedings. 1994. -№ 84. -P. 412-416.
  15. Myrdal G. Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: Duckworth, 1957.
  16. Siebert H. Regional Economic Growth Theory and Policy. Scranton, 1969.
  17. Biyakov O. A. Theory of economic space: Methodological and regional aspects / O. A. Biyakov. -Tomsk : Publishing House Vol. un-ta, 2004. -152 p.
  18. Granberg, A. G. Fundamentals of regional economics / A. G. Granberg. -M.: Higher School of Economics, 2004. -495 p.
  19. Ilyukhina I.B., Ilminskaya S.A. Regional projections of the socio-economic space of Russia // Vestnik OrelGIET. -2020. -№ 1(51). -Pp. 81-87. -http://dx.doi.org/10.36683/2076-5347-2020-1-51-81-87.
  20. Inshakov, O. V. Economic space and spatial economy / O. V. Inshakov // Spatial Economy. -2006. -No. 2. -pp. 28-38.
  21. Kiseleva N.N., Doroshenko O.N. Socio-economic differentiation and stimulation of the development of problem regions of the Southern Federal District. -Rostov-on-Don-Pyatigorsk: Publishing house of SAGS, Publishing house of «Special Printing», 2004. pp. 8-9.
  22. Krugman P. Space. The Last frontier // Spatial Economics, 2005. No. 3. pp. 121-126.
  23. Markwart E., Kiseleva N. N., Sosnin D. P. The system of reference settlements as a mechanism for managing spatial development: theoretical and practical aspects // Power. 2022. Volume 30. No. 2. pp. 95-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i2.8939.
  24. Minakir P. A. Russian Economic space. Strategic dead ends // The economy of the region. -2019. -Vol. 15, issue 4. -pp. 967-980.
  25. Mirgorodskaya E.O., Sukhinin S.A. Heterogeneity of the regional economic space // Bulletin of the Volga. Series 3, Economics. Ecology. 2017. Vol. 19. No. 3. p. 144.
  26. Savelyev Yu.V. Regional economic policy and structural shifts in the economy of Russian regions // Izvestiya Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva. 2013. Vol.145. No.2. pp. 9-24.
  27. Serkov L. A. Interregional inflationary differential as a consequence of the heterogeneity of the Russian economic space // The economy of the region. -2020. -Vol. 16, issue 1. -pp. 325-339.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies