Digitalization of Civil Litigation in Canada


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Research Objective. The article examines the prerequisites, prospects and problems of digitalization of the judicial process in Canada. It analyzes the electronic filing of documents, electronic evidence, electronic access to court documents and the regulations governing them. This is necessary to identify the main directions of development of the Canadian legal system in the development of digital technology. Among other things, the article answers the question - whether some aspects of the application of electronic justice do not contradict the fundamental constitutional principles and principles of civil procedure. Conclusions. The process of digitalization of justice seems inevitable. The introduction of information and communication technologies in the administration of justice offers great opportunities for increasing the efficiency of the judicial system. Digitalization of justice helps to increase transparency, efficiency and access to justice. The introduction of some elements of e-justice provides significant time and cost savings that will improve the efficiency and timeliness of the administration of justice in Canada. In the context of new information technology, many benefits are expected with respect to open access to court documents, but at the same time, unrestricted access to court documents also leads to possible violations of privacy and security rights.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Ekaterina Rusakova

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: rusakova-ep@rudn.ru
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Procedural Law and Private International Law, Law Institute Moscow, Russian Federation

Dilyara Altynbaeva

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

student of the Law Institute Moscow, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Dicey, A. V. (1915) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution / A. V. Dicey. - 8th ed. (repr.). -L., 1915.
  2. Guidelines for Printed and Electronic Versions of Appeal Documents. URL: https://scc-csc.ca/parties/gl-ld2021-01-27-eng.aspx.
  3. Hogg, P. W. (2007) Constitutional Law of Canada / P. W. Hogg. - 5th ed. - Toronto,. - Parts 1, 4.
  4. Kleandrov M.I. (2018). Scientific and technical progress and problems of justice. State and Law. No. 3. P. 14-27. (in Rus.).
  5. Laskin, B. The Supreme Court of Canada -The First One Hundred Years. A Capsule Institutional History / B. Laskin // Can. Bar Rev. - 1975. - Vol. 53. -P. 459-461.
  6. Model Policy for Access to Court Records in Canada URL: https://lexum.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/2005-model-policy-access-court-records-canada.pdf.
  7. Use of Personal Information in Judgments and Recommended Protocol URL: https://cjc-ccm.ca/cmslib/general/ news_pub_techissues_UseProtocol_2005_en.pdf
  8. Official website of the Federal Court of Canada. URL: https://scc-csc.ca/home-accueil/index-eng.aspx.
  9. Rusakova E.P., Inshakova A.O. (2021) Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering in Digital Legal Proceedings in the Asia-Pacific Region: a New Level of Quality Based on data, Blockchain and AI. International Journal for Quality Research. 15(1) 273-290, doi: 10.24874/IJQR15.01-16 ISSN 1800-6450
  10. Rusakova E.P., Inshakova A.O., Frolova E.E. (2021) Legal Regulation of Internet Courts in China. In: Popkova E.G., Sergi B.S. (eds) Modern Global Economic System: Evolutional Development vs. Revolutionary Leap. ISC 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, V. 198. Pp. 1515-1521. Springer, Cham. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69415-9_167

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML


##common.cookie##