Tourist-recreational impact on the Moscow–St. Petersburg macroregion: a multi-scale assessment using Big Data

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The possibilities of using one of the varieties of Big Data – geolocalized photographs – as an objective indicator of the spatial distribution and intensity of tourist and recreational load within the macroregion “From Moscow to St. Petersburg” allocated within the framework of the State Program for Tourism Development are considered. The study uses an original geoinformation model assembled on the basis of freely distributed OpenStreetMap layers and photo points localized in space and time. It allows, on the one hand, to characterize the features of the placement of attractors (natural, cultural) and tourist and recreational infrastructure, on the other – to objectively assess the spatial distribution of the presence of tourists and recreants within the macroregion and describe the specifics of their intra-annual (seasonal) “attraction”. Aggregation of photography points into polygons, taking into account the differentiated clustering distance, made it possible to form areas of seasonal (summer, winter and spring-autumn) stay of tourists, as well as to get an idea of the minimum year-round and maximum episodic areas within the macroregion and individual areas exposed to the potential impact of tourists and recreants. The differences between the minimum and maximum areas of stay of tourists and recreants are proposed to be used to assess the effectiveness of the functioning of the industry in the areas of the macroregion. The obtained spatial areas and patterns of tourists’ presence open up opportunities for an objective assessment of the potential load on natural and cultural heritage sites. The uneven inclusion of both natural and cultural attractors in the sphere of tourism and recreation has been revealed, which leads to a situation where some objects of natural and cultural heritage experience significant industry pressure, while others remain almost or completely unaffected by the presence of tourists and recreants.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Е. Yu. Kolbowsky

Lomonosov Moscow State University; Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: kolbowsky@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

O. A. Klimanova

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: oxkl@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Antonov E.V., Belyayev Yu.R., Bityukova V.R., Bredikhin A.V., Dekhnich V.S., Eremenko E.A., Koldobskaya N.A., Prusikhin O.E., Safronov S.G. Integral assessment of anthropogenic impact on the Baikal natural territory: Methodological approaches and typology of municipal units. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2023, no. 3, pp. 430–447. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556623030032
  2. Antonov E.V., Bityukova V.R. Approaches to the anthropogenic impact assessment at municipal level (the case of Baikal natural territory. Reg. Issled., 2023, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 51–65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2023-2-5
  3. Bityukova V.R. Environmental consequences of the transformation of the sectoral structure of the economy of Russian regions and cities in the post-Soviet period. Reg. Res. Russ., 2022, vol. 12, pp. 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522020022
  4. Dunkel A. Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photogeodata. Landsc. Urban Plan., 2015, no. 142, pp. 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.022
  5. Formica S., Uysal M. Destination attractiveness based on supply and demand evaluations: An analytical framework. J. Travel Res., 2006, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 418–430.
  6. Gatrell A.C., Bailey T.C., Diggle P.J., Rowlingson B.S. Spatial point pattern analysis and its application in geographical epidemiology. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 1996, no. 21. pp. 256–274.
  7. Grekousis G. Spatial analysis methods and practice: Describe – Explore – Explain through GIS. New York: CUP, 2020. 535 p.
  8. Gribok M.V. Geotagged photos on the internet as a data source for geographic research. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2020, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 461–469. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556620030061
  9. Kadar B., Gede M. Where do tourists go? Visualizing and analysing the spatial distribution of geotagged photography. Cartograph.: Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Geovisual., 2013, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 78–88. http://doi.org/10.3138/carto.48.2.1839
  10. Klimanova O.A., Illarionova O.A., Klimanov V.V. The geography of natural tourist attractors in Russia. Reg. Issled., 2023, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 66–78. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2023-2-6
  11. Klimanova O.A., Kolbowsky E.Yu., Illarionova O.A., Zemlyanski D.Yu. The concept of ecological carrying capacity: current state and algorithm of assessment for different types of tourist areas. Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ.: Nauki Zemle, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 806–830. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2021.409
  12. Kolbowsky E.Yu. Ekologicheskii turizm i ekologiya turizma [Ecological Tourism and Tourism Ecology]. Moscow: Akademiya Publ., 2011. 256 p.
  13. Kolbowsky E.Yu. Prostranstvennyi analiz v geoekologii [Spatial Analysis in Geoecology]. Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2022. 820 p.
  14. Kolbowsky E.Yu., Medovikova U.A. Evaluation of landscape aesthetic properties for the managing of areas of outstanding natural and culture-historical value. Izv. RGO, 2016, vol. 3, pp. 61–75. (In Russ.).
  15. Langemeyer L., Calcagnia F., Barуa F. Mapping the intangible: Using geolocated social media data to examine landscape aesthetics. Land Use Policy, 2018, no. 77, pp. 542–552.
  16. Mukhina L.I., Runova T.G. On the logic of studying geographical aspects of interaction in the system “population-economy-nature”. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geogr., 1977, no. 4, pp. 54–68. (In Russ.).
  17. O’Sullivan D., Unwin D. Geographic information analysis. John Wiley & Sons. 2010.
  18. Openshaw S., Clark G. Developing spatial analysis functions relevant to GIS environments. In Spatial Analytical Perspectives on GIS. Fisher M., Scholten H.J., Unwin D., Eds. Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2005, pp. 24–44.
  19. Oyana T.J., Margai F. Spatial analysis: Statistics, visualization, and computational methods. CRC Press, 2015.
  20. Radchenko T.A., Bannikova K.A., Kochetkova N.M. Tourism industry development: Geospatial data as a decision-making tool. Vopr. Gos. Munits. Upravl., 2022, no. 3, pp. 193–218. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-3-193-218
  21. Ribeiro J.C., da Cruz Vareiro L.M. The Tourist Potential of the Minho-Lima Region (Portugal). In Visions for global tourism industry: Creating and sustaining competitive strategies, 2012, pp. 339–356. http://doi.org/10.5772/38197
  22. Tikunov V.S., Belozerov V.S., Antipov S.O., Suprunchuk I.P. Social media as a tool for the analysis of tourist objects (case study of the Stavropol krai). Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2018, no. 3, pp. 89–95. (In Russ.).
  23. Vorobyev A.N. Big data in the study of localization and mobility of the population. Geogr. Prir. Resur., 2020, no. 5, pp. 203–207. (In Russ.).
  24. Vostrova E.I. Big data as a tool for transformation in the tourism industry. Sots.-Gum. Znan., 2022, no. 4, pp. 157–164. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.34823/SGZ.2022.4.518862
  25. Yoshimura N., Hiura T. Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services: use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in Hokkaido. Ecosyst. Serv., 2017, vol. 24, pp. 68–78. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.009
  26. Zemlyanski D.Yu., Klimanova O.A., Illarionova O.A., Kolbowsky E.Yu. Ekologicheskaya emkost’ turistskikh territorii: podkhody k otsenke, indikatory i algoritmy rashcheta [Ecological Capacity of Tourist Territories: Approaches to Assessment, Indicators and Calculation Algorithms]. Moscow, VAVT Publ., 2020. 102 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. An example of data comparison on graphs for the Republic of Karelia: a) distribution of tourists by month according to SberAnalytics data, b) distribution of photos by month, c) dependence of the number of photos taken on the number of tourists (the value of the determination coefficient R2 is 10.3%); blue icons – winter months, red icons – summer months, yellow icons – off-season (spring – autumn).

Download (214KB)
3. Fig. 2. Distribution of geolocalized photo images by seasons of the year in the Petrozavodsk region against the background of elements of tourist and recreational potential.

Download (398KB)
4. Fig. 3. Some types of seasonal patterns and corresponding tourist and recreational areas within the macroregion: (a) summer around the regional center – Tver; (b) summer, coastal recreation on Lake Peipus; (c) summer lakeside on the skerry shores of Lake Ladoga in the vicinity of Kuznechnoye, Leningrad Region; (d) summer, with the Oredezhskoye Koltso river route in the vicinity of Luga; (d) winter around the Mikhailovskoye Museum-Reserve in the vicinity of Pushkin Hills; (e) winter with ski slopes and fishing in the vicinity of Pargolovo, Leningrad Region.

Download (1MB)
5. Fig. 4. Seasonal areas of presence in the vicinity of Ostashkov, Tver region: (a) summer, (b) winter, (c) demi-season, (d) overlap of three areas.

Download (708KB)
6. Fig. 5. Typical variants of the ratio of areas of presence of tourists and recreationists and specially protected natural areas: (a) the environs of St. Petersburg; (b) Valdai National Park on the border of Novgorod and Tver regions; (c) Zavidovo National Park on the axis between Moscow and Tver; (d) Ladoga Skerries, Republic of Karelia; (d) northwestern coast of Lake Onega, (e) “provincial” territory with specially protected natural areas between Andreapol and Nelidovo, Tver region. The density of areas of presence is estimated by 7 classes corresponding to intervals of absolute values ​​(the “natural boundaries” division method).

Download (1MB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences