«Homogeneity of Benefit and Righteousness»in Mohism and its Modern Value


Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

The debate between righteousness and benefit, which originated in the pre-Qin period, is one of the theoretical sources of traditional moral culture. «Righteousness is the benefit brought to the people» [Mozi1, 2006: 317], which is the cornerstone of Mozi’s theory, and is a major proposition of his ethical system of «Universal Love, mutual benefit» [Mozi, 2006: 203]. From Confucianism’s «Value righteousness and belittle profit» to Mohism’s «Homogeneity of benefit and righteousness», a significant change has taken place. Mozi’s view of human interests is neither «Selflessness» nor «Profit at another’s expense» [Mozi, Mozi, 2006: 143], but rather aims at «Benefit to the state and the people» [Mozi, 2006: 273]. At a time when a socialist market economy and a society based on the rule of law are being built, the reinterpretation of «Righteousness is the benefit brought to the people» [Mozi, 2006: 317] is of both theoretical and practical significance to the critical inheritance of traditional moral culture. It has both theoretical and practical implications.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Huili Xin

School of Marxism of Shanghai University of Political Science and Law

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: xinhuili2005@163.com

Dr. Sci., Associate Professor

República da China, Shanghai

Chengyong Xiao

School of Marxism of Shanghai University of Political Science and Law

Email: xchengyong@163.com

Professor, Master

República da China, Shanghai

Bibliografia

  1. Xiao Chengyong «Whole World as One Community»: Basic Idea of Mohist Social Morality Ethics.Journal of Anhui Normal University (Hum. & Soc. Sci). 2015(3): 289-293 p.
  2. Confucius. The Analects. Hunan People's Publishing House. 1999. 33p.
  3. Mozi. Mozi. Hunan People’s Publishing House. 2006. 273 p.
  4. Xiao Chengyong. Axiom, Rule and Social Morality-The Ethical Differentiates in Confucian’s Family Morality and Mohist’s Social Morality. Studies in Dialectics of Nature. 2011(11): 105-111 p.
  5. Huang Weihe. Mozi's View of Righteousness and Benefit. Social Sciences in China. 1985(3): 115-124 p.
  6. Guo Hongji. The Arrogation of the Confucian Doctrine of the Virtue of Personality to the Person of Right. Gansu Social Sciences. 1994(1): 64-68 p.
  7. Marx and Engels. Vol. 4. Marx&Engels Collected Works. Lawrence&Wishart Electric Book. 2010: 121 p.
  8. Li Deshun. Footprints of Moral Transformation — A Review of Some Ethical Events in China in the Past 30 Years. Jianghai Academic Journal. 2010(4): 13-20 p.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML