Biological method of oil and oil products spill clean-upon the ground
- Авторы: Русакова Е.С.1, Елизарова Е.А.1
-
Учреждения:
- Самарский государственный технический университет
- Выпуск: Том 2 (2023)
- Страницы: 211-212
- Раздел: Иностранный язык в области профессиональной коммуникации
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/osnk-sr2023/article/view/409806
- ID: 409806
Цитировать
Полный текст
Аннотация
Background. The oil industry is one of the most profitable sectors of our economy. However, the process of oil production is not only difficult, but also dangerous for the environment in cases of technological accidents. Oil and oil products spills pose a threat to human life. For this reason, various methods have been invented to eliminate oil and oil products spills on the ground.
Aim. The aim of the research is identifying advantages and disadvantages of biological purification methods of oil-contaminated lands on Tomsk region.
Methods. Biological methods of elimination can be divided into:
- Phytoremediation;
- Bioremediation.
Phytoremediation [2] is one of the new directions of biological elimination based on the use of plants of their ability to absorb and accumulate pollution in their parts, as well as to activate the activity of soil microorganisms in the fight against pollution, providing them with the necessary nutrients
The phytoremediation principle of plant action consists of several stages:
- Absorption and accumulation of the pollutant in the rhizosphere of plants;
- Transformation of the pollutant from the roots to the stem;
- Release of recycled pollutant residues into the atmosphere using leaves.
Bioremediation methods [1] are based on the destruction of pollutants by various types of microorganisms. The effect is achieved by activating the native microflora or introducing certain cultures of microorganisms into the soil, as well as all kinds of complex preparations and methods.
Results. We considered two methods of land recultivation in oil-contaminated territories of Tomsk region:
1) Bioremediation, using the biological preparation “MD-dry, liquid”;
2) A complex method using cultures of microbial destructors and herb meliorants isolated from the native microflora.
As objects of research, we considered two contaminated sites, reclaimed by various methods of biological purification. The recultivation of site 1, located at the Zapadno-Ostaninskoye field, was carried out by a complex method. The recultivation of site 2, located at the Luginetsky deposit, was carried out by a bioremediation. You can see the results of our research in the fig. 1. The blue blocks show amount of oil before recultivation, they exceeded the permissible values by 4 times. The orange blocks show the amount of oil after recultivation.
Fig. 1. The content of petroleum products in the soils of the experimental sites before and after recultivation
The species composition and phytomass of the living ground cover after reclamation were also considered. You can see the results of our research in the table 1.
Table 1. The data of covering after remediation
№ | Plant species | Number of experimental site | |
1 | 2 | ||
1 | Marsh bagulnik | 4,1/1,4 | 1,7/2,3 |
2 | European weekday | 0,4/0,1 | – |
3 | Marsh cypress | 4,7/1,6 | 5,5/9,1 |
Sample number 1 called Marsh bagulnik and 3 called Marsh cypress were able to adapt to the soils after using both methods, but sample 2 called European weekday was unable to adapt to the soil of site 2.
Conclusions. During the research, various advantages and disadvantages of the methods were found but the best method of elimination is a complex method.
Ключевые слова
Полный текст
Background. The oil industry is one of the most profitable sectors of our economy. However, the process of oil production is not only difficult, but also dangerous for the environment in cases of technological accidents. Oil and oil products spills pose a threat to human life. For this reason, various methods have been invented to eliminate oil and oil products spills on the ground.
Aim. The aim of the research is identifying advantages and disadvantages of biological purification methods of oil-contaminated lands on Tomsk region.
Methods. Biological methods of elimination can be divided into:
- Phytoremediation;
- Bioremediation.
Phytoremediation [2] is one of the new directions of biological elimination based on the use of plants of their ability to absorb and accumulate pollution in their parts, as well as to activate the activity of soil microorganisms in the fight against pollution, providing them with the necessary nutrients
The phytoremediation principle of plant action consists of several stages:
- Absorption and accumulation of the pollutant in the rhizosphere of plants;
- Transformation of the pollutant from the roots to the stem;
- Release of recycled pollutant residues into the atmosphere using leaves.
Bioremediation methods [1] are based on the destruction of pollutants by various types of microorganisms. The effect is achieved by activating the native microflora or introducing certain cultures of microorganisms into the soil, as well as all kinds of complex preparations and methods.
Results. We considered two methods of land recultivation in oil-contaminated territories of Tomsk region:
1) Bioremediation, using the biological preparation “MD-dry, liquid”;
2) A complex method using cultures of microbial destructors and herb meliorants isolated from the native microflora.
As objects of research, we considered two contaminated sites, reclaimed by various methods of biological purification. The recultivation of site 1, located at the Zapadno-Ostaninskoye field, was carried out by a complex method. The recultivation of site 2, located at the Luginetsky deposit, was carried out by a bioremediation. You can see the results of our research in the fig. 1. The blue blocks show amount of oil before recultivation, they exceeded the permissible values by 4 times. The orange blocks show the amount of oil after recultivation.
Fig. 1. The content of petroleum products in the soils of the experimental sites before and after recultivation
The species composition and phytomass of the living ground cover after reclamation were also considered. You can see the results of our research in the table 1.
Table 1. The data of covering after remediation
№ | Plant species | Number of experimental site | |
1 | 2 | ||
1 | Marsh bagulnik | 4,1/1,4 | 1,7/2,3 |
2 | European weekday | 0,4/0,1 | – |
3 | Marsh cypress | 4,7/1,6 | 5,5/9,1 |
Sample number 1 called Marsh bagulnik and 3 called Marsh cypress were able to adapt to the soils after using both methods, but sample 2 called European weekday was unable to adapt to the soil of site 2.
Conclusions. During the research, various advantages and disadvantages of the methods were found but the best method of elimination is a complex method.
Об авторах
Екатерина Сергеевна Русакова
Самарский государственный технический университет
Автор, ответственный за переписку.
Email: ekaserrus@gmail.com
студентка, группа 2-ИНГТ-103, институт нефтегазовых технологий
Россия, СамараЕвгения Анатольевна Елизарова
Самарский государственный технический университет
Email: evgenka56@mail.ru
научный руководитель автора, кандидат педагогических наук, доцент
Россия, СамараСписок литературы
- Vural A., Demir S., Boyno G. Bioremediation and using of fungi in bioremediation // Yuzuncu yil university journal of agricultural sciences. 2018. Vol. 28, No. 4. P. 490–501. doi: 10.29133/yyutbd.418430
- Gerhardt K.E., MacNeill G.J., Gerwing P.D., Greenberg B.M. Phytoremediation of Salt-Impacted Soils and Use of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) to Enhance Phytoremediation. Phytoremediation Vol. 5. / Ansari A., Gill S., Gill R., et al editors. Springer, Cham, 2017. P. 19–51. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-52381-1_2
Дополнительные файлы
