Modern capabilities of the computed tomography in orbital traumatic injuries diagnosis

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nowadays the problem of orbital trauma remains extremely relevant. Combined damage of several anatomical structures, globe injury, various clinical manifestations, the necessity of optimal surgical treatment require high-quality, timely diagnostics. Considering the current development of diagnostic equipment, postprocessing of CT data acquires the key role in order to obtain objective diagnostic information in patients with orbital trauma.

AIM: Evaluation of the effectiveness of the developed methods for CT data assessing in patients with orbital trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2016 to 2021 a total of 107 patients (100%) with orbital injuries were examined in Sechenov University clinics. All patients were distributed depending on the injury occurrence time: 50 patients (47%) — in acute and subacute periods, 30 patients (28%) — in the period of formation of post-traumatic deformities, 27 patients (25%) — in the period of formed post-traumatic deformities. All patients (n = 107; 100%) underwent CT data analysis according to the developed protocol: analysis of bone and soft tissue trauma using a specialized algorithm, assessment of orbital volumes, evaluation of defects in the inferior orbital wall, examination of the globe position and of changes in the density of the orbital soft tissues.

RESULTS: In the preoperative period the developed algorithm for orbital volumes measuring additionally revealed a post-traumatic increase in orbital volume in 21 patients (19%). The technique for the globe position assessing additionally revealed the risk of enophthalmos in 9 patients (8.1%), and in 1 case (0.9%) the suspicion of globe displacement was not confirmed. The defects of the inferior orbital wall were classified into small (n = 18; 17%), medium (n = 31; 29%) and large/total (n = 38; 35% and n = 20; 19%, respectively). In 88 patients (82%), the ratio of the defect to the entire inferior orbital wall was more than 6.65%, in 19 patients (18%) — less than 6.65%. Changes in the density of the orbital soft tissues were as follows: soft tissue edema — n = 60 (56%), soft tissue atrophy — n = 28 (27%), hematoma of the orbital soft tissues — n = 10 (9%), density was not changed — n = 9 (8%). In the postoperative period, the developed methods for CT data processing revealed incomplete restoration of the orbital volume in 31 cases (29%), incomplete coverage of the inferior orbital wall defect in 38 cases (35%), globe displacement in 14 cases (13%), which was not determined by the standard CT data assessment without the specialized technique. In 7 cases (6%), a suspicion of an increase in the orbital volume was not confirmed by the developed methodology.

CONCLUSION: The developed methods for measuring orbit volumes, assessing defects in the lower orbital wall, the globe position, and the condition of the orbital soft tissues provide statistically reliable additional diagnostic information about the patient’s condition and personalized approach for preoperative planning for each patient.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Dmitry V. Davydov

P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncological Institute; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Email: d-davydov3@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5506-6021
SPIN-code: 1368-2453

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of Department of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery with an Ophthalmology Course

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Natalya S. Serova

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: dr.serova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2975-4431
SPIN-code: 4632-3235

Сorresponding Member, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Department of Radiation Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy of the N.V. Sklifosovsky ICM

Russian Federation, Moscow

Olga Yu. Pavlova

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.olgapavlova@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8898-3125
SPIN-code: 8326-0220

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy of the N.V. Sklifosovsky ICM

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Essig H, Dressel L, Rana M, et al. Precision of posttraumatic primary orbital reconstruction using individually bent titanium mesh with and without navigation: a retrospective study. Head and Face Medicine. 2013;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-9-18
  2. Nastri AL, Gurney B. Current concepts in midface fracture management. Curr Opin Otolaryngol and Head Neck Surg. 2016;24(4):368–375. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000267
  3. Kühnel TS, Reichert TE. Trauma of the midface. Head and Neck Surgery. 2015;14:45.
  4. Eolchiian SA, Kataev MG, Serova NK. Current approaches to surgical treatment for cranioorbital injuries. The Russian annals of ophthalmology. 2006;122(6):9–13. (In Russ.)
  5. Davydov DV, Serova NS, Pavlova OYu. The effectiveness of orbital volumes calculations after traumatic injuries based on CT data. Russian Electronic Journal of Radiology. 2021;11(1):206–212. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21569/2222-7415-2021-11-1-206-212
  6. Sangayeva LM, Serova NS, Vyklyuk MV, Bulanova TV. Radiodiagnosis of injuries to the eye and orbital structures. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2007;(2):11. (In Russ.)
  7. Susarla SM, Duncan K, Mahoney NR, et al. Virtual Surgical Planning for Orbital Reconstruction. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015;22(4):442–426. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.164626

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Computed tomography. Algorithm of orbit volumes measurements: a, b, c — axial views, marking of orbital bone borders, d — 3D reconstruction of facial skeleton, e, f — 3D reconstructions of volumes of the right and left orbits

Download (242KB)
3. Fig. 2. Computed tomography: a — sagittal reconstruction; b, c — coronal reconstruction; d — axial reconstruction. Marking of the defect borders on multiplanar reconstructions

Download (140KB)
4. Fig. 3. Computed tomography, sagittal view, soft tissue mode. Image postprocessing to determine the position of the eyeball

Download (85KB)
5. Fig. 4. Computed tomography: a — coronal view; b — sagittal view. Determination of the density of the orbital soft tissues in the anterior and deep parts

Download (137KB)
6. Fig. 5. General appearance of the patient before the operation (1 month after the initial intervention)

Download (59KB)
7. Fig. 6. Patient, female, 47 years old, 1 month after the first surgery: а — MSCT, midface, coronal view; b — 3D reconstruction of the orbital volumes; с, d — MSCT of the orbits, sagittal section, assessing the position of the globes

Download (158KB)
8. Fig. 7. Patient, female, 47 years old, 1 week after the reoperation: а — MSCT, midface, coronal view; b — 3D reconstruction of the orbital volumes; с, d — MSCT of the orbits, sagittal section, assessing the position of the globes

Download (284KB)
9. Fig. 8. General appearance of the patient. 3 months after surgery

Download (84KB)

Copyright (c) 2022 Davydov D.V., Serova N.S., Pavlova O.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-65574 от 04 мая 2016 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies