Comparative analysis of vitreofoveolar traction syndrome surgical treatment

Dmitriy Olegovich Shkvorchenko; Шкворченко Дмитрий Олегович; Valeriy Dmitriyevich Zakharov; Захаров Валерий Дмитриевич; Anna Vladimirovna Rusanovskaya; Русановская Анна Владимировна; Yelena Vladimirovna Belousova; Белоусова Елена Владимировна; Svetlana Aleksandrovna Kakunina; Какунина Светлана Александровна; Tamara Sergeyevna Mironova; Миронова Тамара Сергеевна; Viktoriya Adilyevna Pismenskaya; Письменская Виктория Адильевна; Kirill Sergeyevich Norman; Норман Кирилл Сергеевич

doi:10.17816/OV2014328-33

Comparative analysis of vitreofoveolar traction syndrome surgical treatment

Authors: Shkvorchenko D.O.¹, Zakharov V.D.¹, Rusanovskaya A.V.¹, Belousova Y.V.¹, Kakunina S.A.¹, Mironova T.S.¹, Pismenskaya V.A.¹, Norman K.S.¹
Affiliations:
1. Svyatoslav Fyodorov State Institution Eye Microsurgery Complex
Issue: Vol 7, No 3 (2014)
Pages: 28-33
Section: Articles
URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/ov/article/view/347
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/OV2014328-33
ID: 347

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

This article focuses on the surgical treatment of the vitreomacular traction ( VMT) syndrome comparing vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. In the 1st group, the procedure was performed without the ILM removal. In the 2nd group, the surgery was performed with perifoveolar ILM removal. A comparative analysis revealed that an anatomical result was reached in both groups, but in the 1st group, the development of epiretinal fibrosis was observed in 35 % of the cases in the late postoperative period; and this was not observed in the 2nd group. Visual function recovery was faster in the 1st group, but at 1 year visit, data from both groups were comparable. Thus, the treatment method with surgical ILM removal is preferable, due to more stable anatomical result.

Keywords

vitreomacular traction syndrome, epiretinal fibrosis, internal limiting membrane, surgical treatment

References

Байбородов Я. В. 27G-хирургия первой стадии макулярных разрывов без витрэктомии. В кн.: Сборник тезисов «Федоровские чтения - 2011» IX Всероссийская научно-практическая конференция с международным участием; 2011.
Стебнев В. С., Малов В. М. Симптоматическая витреомакулярная адгезия: варианты естественного безоперационного течения. В кн.: Современные технологии лечения витреоретинальной патологии. М.; 2013: 178-180.
Bottos J., Elizalde J. Vitreomacular traction syndrome. J. Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2012; 7 (2): 148-161.
Donald M. Gass. Reappraisal of Biomicroscopic Classification of Stages of Development of a Macular Hole./ American Journal of Ophthhalmology. 1995; 119: 752-759.
Duker J. S., Kaiser P. K., Binder S., Gaudric A., Reichel E. The international vitreomacular traction study group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120 (12): 2611-9.
Johnson M. W. Perifoveal vitreous detachment and its macular complications. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol Soc. 2005; 103: 537-567.
Niranjan K., Jamal K., Khalid S. Partial-thickness macular hole in traction syndrome: a case report the literature. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2010; 4: 7-12.
Taiichi Hikichi, Akitoshi Yoshida, Jun Akiba, Clement L. Trempe. Natural outcomes of stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 idiopathic macular holes.British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1995; 79: 517-520.
Steel D., Lotery A. Idiopathic vitreomacular traction and macular hole: a comprehensive review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Eye. 2013; 27: 1-21.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files

Action

1. JATS XML

Download

Username
Password
Remember me

Forgot password?	Register

Username
Password
Remember me

Forgot password?	Register

Comparative analysis of vitreofoveolar traction syndrome surgical treatment

Full Text

Abstract

Keywords

About the authors

References

Supplementary files

This website uses cookies