Improvement of results of surgical treatment of giant hernias of inguinofemoral region by choice of method of hernioplasty (clinical case)

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Aim. Description of a clinical case pf patient K., 71 years old, as an illustration of the possibility to improve treatment of giant hernias in the inguinofemoral region. The patient was hospitalized with the diagnosis: bilateral giant irreducible inguinoscrotal hernia. The specificity of this case was implementation of the operation of hernioectomy from preperitoneal access with prosthetics of the posterior surface of the anterior abdominal wall with polypropylene (prolene) mesh on both sides. In a month after discharge from hospital the condition remained satisfactory, postoperative scar was normotrophic, testicles painless to palpation with a small amount of fluid in the dartos, skin of scrotum contracted.

Conclusion. Hernioectomy from preperitoneal access with prosthetics of the posterior surface of the anterior abdominal wall with polypropylene (prolene) mesh in patients with giant, irreducible and recurrent hernias possesses a number of peculiarities in comparison with traditional methods, since it permits: 1) to fix endoprosthesis to permanent anatomical structures with simultaneous repair of all the defects of the transverse fascia; 2) to operate outside the zone of scar tissue in recurrent hernias; 3) to perform an adequate revision of the organs of the hernial sack in irreducible hernias; 4) to perform operations on patients with distinct comorbid pathology and contraindications to general anesthesia.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Sergei V. Leonchenko

Ryazan State Medical University; Municipal Clinical Hospital №11

Author for correspondence.
Email: leonc17@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5266-7486
SPIN-code: 4713-4490

MD, PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Urology with the Course of Surgical Diseases; Surgeon of the Surgical Department №1

Russian Federation, Ryazan; Ryazan

Maksim L. Stavtsev

Ryazan State Medical University; Municipal Clinical Hospital №11

Email: leonc17@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8077-533X

MD, PhD, Assistant of the Department of Urology with the Course of Surgical Diseases; Surgeon of the Surgical Department №1

Russian Federation, Ryazan; Ryazan

References

  1. Hussain A, Mahmood H, Nicholls J, et al. Laparo-scopic ventral hernia repair. Our experience of 61 consecutive series: Prospective study. International journal of surgery. 2008;6(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.11.006
  2. Fedoseyev AB, Murav'yev SYu, Chekushin AA, et al. Vzglyad na etiologiyu i patogenez gryzheobrazovaniya v XXI veke. Gerniologiya. 2009;(2):8-13. (In Russ).
  3. Nyhus LM. Herniology 1948-1998: Evolution toward excellence. Hernia. 1998;2(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01207764
  4. Rybachkov VV, Kabanov EN, Abakshin NS. Kriterii vybora gernioplastiki pri posleoperatsionnykh ventral'nykh gryzhakh. Gerniologiya. 2009;(1):34-5. (In Russ).
  5. Sinichenko GI, Gayvoronskiy IV, Kurygin AA, et al. Vybor sposoba plastiki peredney bryushnoy stenki u bol’nykh s posleoperatsionnymi ventral’nymi gryzhami. Vestnik Khirurgii im. I.I. Grekova. 2005;1654(6):29-32. (In Russ).
  6. Lichtenstein LI, Shulman AG, Amid PK, et al. The Tension-Free Hernioplasty. The American Journal of Surgery. 1989;157(2):188-93. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90526-6
  7. Shevchenko YuL, Kharnas SS, Egorov AV, et al. Choice of a technique for plastic repair of the anterior abdominal wall in inguinal hernia. Russian Journal of Surgery. 2003;(1):20-2. (In Russ).
  8. Tarasenko SV, Zaytsev OV, Akhmedov ShI. Occult hernia – laparoscopic hernia repair advantage (TAPP). Nauka Molodykh (Eruditio Juvenium). 2015;(4):70-2. (In Russ).
  9. Egiyev VN, Lyadov KV, Voskresenskiy PK. Atlas operativnoy khirurgii gryzh. Moscow: Medpraktika-M; 2003. (In Russ).
  10. Zhebrovskiy VV, Mokhammed Tom El’bashir. Khirurgiya gryzh zhivota i eventratsii. Simferopol’: Biznes-Inform; 2002. (In Russ).
  11. Tutov AS, Kuznetsov SS, Bukreyeva AE. Osobennosti rannego i otdalennogo posleoperatsionnogo perioda pri khirurgicheskom lechenii posleoperatsionnykh ventral’nykh gryzh. Vestnik Gerniologii. 2006;(2):189-92. (In Russ).
  12. Adamyan AA. Put’ alloplastiki v gerniologii i sovremennyye eye vozmozhnosti. In: I mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya «Sovremennyye metody gernioplastiki i abdominoplastiki s primeneniyem polimernykh implantatov». 25-26 November 2003; Moscow. Moscow; 2003. P. 15-6. (In Russ).
  13. Adamyan AA, Velichenko R.E. Mediko-sotsial’nyye aspekty plastiki peredney bryushnoy stenki. Annals of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 1999;(2):41-8. (In Russ).

Copyright (c) 2021 Eco-Vector



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies