Fractures of long tubular bones in newborns: mechanisms of injuries, methods of diagnosis, and treatment

Cover Page

Cite item


Background. Medical information on the provision of emergency trauma care to newborns with fractures of tubular bones is scarce.

Aim. This scientific review aimed to inform children's orthopedic traumatologists regarding the main mechanisms of injury, methods of diagnosis, and treatment of fractures of long tubular bones in newborns.

Material and methods. The article presents a systematic analysis of 60 scientific works of domestic and foreign authors on topical aspects of fractures of long tubular bones in newborns from 1986 to 2018. For writing the literature review, we used modern electronic databases of medical information: PubMed, MEDLINE, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory, DOAJ, Cyberleninka, and еLibrary.

Results and discussion. Similarly from the analysis of scientific publications, the main mechanism of fractures of limb segments in newborns is intranatal trauma, in which the child can receive both during birth through the birth canal and during cesarean section. The predisposing factors for obtaining bone fractures are intrauterine osteopenia, congenital diseases of the digestive system, and prematurity. Fractures are diagnosed on the basis of clinical examination and results of ultrasound and X-ray studies of the injured limb. In the treatment of limb bone fractures, both conservative and surgical methods are used. In recent years, a tendency has been clearly observed in scientific publications, highlighting the ever-widening introduction into clinical practice of operational methods for stabilizing fractures of long tubular bones in newborns, including using the techniques of transosseous osteosynthesis.

Conclusion. The presented article fills the existing gap of summarizing scientific publications on the treatment of fractures of limbs in newborns.

Full Text


Presently, few scientific articles devoted to the issues of emergency trauma care for newborns with tubular bone fractures have been published. We report modern scientific information about the mechanisms of injury, methods of diagnostics, and treatment of long tubular bone fractures in newborns.

Material and methods

Modern electronic medical information databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory, Directory of Open Access Journals [DOAJ], Cyberleninka, and eLibrary) were used to review the literature on long tubular bone fractures in newborns. Because of the rarity of reports on this subject, the depth of the literature search (60 sources) was 30 years.

Results and discussion

Birth trauma is the main cause of skeletal bone fractures in newborns, including long tubular bones [1–3]. Intrauterine bone fractures due to prenatally caused neuromuscular diseases [4, 5], osteopetrosis [6], or osteogenesis imperfecta [7, 8] are extremely rare. The literature describes cases of spontaneous long tubular bone fractures in newborns, without even minimal external exposure, who received treatment immediately after birth in intensive care units [9, 10].

Birth injuries to the skeletal bones in newborns are caused most often by the aids used by obstetrician-gynecologists and delivery nurses during labor through the natural birth canal [11, 12] and during operative delivery [13–17]. There is no single viewpoint on which obstetric aid method (natural or operational) is most dangerous in causing a birth injury. Some researchers consider that birth through the birth canal is the most traumatic [18–21], whereas others are convinced that cesarean section bears the risk of fracture, especially when performed under emergency indications [22–25]. In addition to obstetric manipulations, the high risk factors for birth injury of the skeletal bones include a large fetus, clinically contracted pelvis, large uterine myoma, numerous previous pregnancies in a parturient woman, and rapid or, on the contrary, prolonged labor [19, 26].

Osteopenia contributes to skeletal bone fractures in children during the first weeks and months of life, and its frequency in premature babies reportedly is 20% to 60% of cases (depending on the gestational age and weight of the newborn) [27–29]. Bone fractures are diagnosed in approximately 10% of premature babies, and they occur on average at 2–3 months of life [30]. Congenital diseases of digestive system organs, diuretic therapy, and parenteral nutrition with a deficiency of trace elements, especially calcium and phosphorus, exacerbate the course of osteopenia [27, 29–33]. Even the most careful and sensitive care for such children by medical personnel or parents is fraught with risk of bone fractures [34]. That is why in the structure of bone fractures, rib fractures are most frequent, since the rib cage is always under external influence [30], followed by fractures of the humeral and femoral bones [3, 20, 23].

Thus, an analysis of published literary sources shows that the average incidence of humeral fractures in newborns amounts to 1 (0.1%) per 1000 live newborns [35]. The primary cause of fractures during labor is shoulder dystocia, which is the condition when, after birth of the fetal head, release of the front shoulder is delayed by 60 h and it is impossible to extract without obstetric manipulations [36, 37]. The frequency of humeral fractures occurring during shoulder dystocia is increased compared with that of the general population and is already 3% of clinical cases [38, 39]. The average time to diagnose a humeral fracture in newborns is approximately 40 h after delivery [40], and ultrasound examination of the injured limb, besides radiography, is of great diagnostic value [34, 41–43]. Differential diagnostic studies of a humerus fracture should be performed primarily in cases of brachial plexitis, osteomyelitis, dislocation of the forearm bones, and congenital abnormalities of development [35, 44].

As a rule, treatment of fractures is conservative with the help of a plaster cast and retentive bandages [41, 42], but in some cases, surgical hardware may be used [40, 43]. Thus, Ratti et al. [23] reported that conservative techniques were used in 29 (88.0%) of 33 newborns with intrauterine lower third humeral fractures, whereas surgical methods were applied in four (12.0%). The study of long-term results, regardless of the applied methods of treatment, demonstrated the correct axis of the shoulder in 88% of cases and full amplitude of movements in the elbow joint of the injured limb in 80%.

Femur fractures are diagnosed in newborns much less frequently than humerus fractures [21], and the average frequency of occurrence is 0.13 cases per 1000 newborns [45]. As a rule, children suffer fractures at this location during delivery through the birth canal, when various obstetric aid techniques are used [11, 12]. Femoral fractures also are possible during cesarean section and often not of one bone but both at the same time (left and right) [14, 15, 25, 46]. Thus, Toker et al. [24] analyzed complications of delivery during 221,939 births and found an incidence of femur fractures during natural delivery of 0.077 cases per 1000 newborns; during cesarean section, this incidence was four times higher (0.308 cases per 1000 newborns). An effective measure to prevent severe intrapartum injury of long tubular bones in newborns can be avoidance of longitudinal incisions in the lower uterine segment during cesarean section [47], as well as careful attitude of the obstetrician-gynecologist regarding the fetus extracted with complete relaxation of the uterus, which is achieved with adequate anesthetic management [11].

To diagnose femur fractures objectively, X-ray examination of the injured limb is performed [48, 49]. Often, the final diagnosis is not established immediately after birth but after some time, sometimes up to 4 days after delivery [16].

Treatment of femur fractures in newborns usually is conservative [40, 42], using well-proven methods as mentioned above [49–51]. The literature also includes reports on surgical treatments in newborns. Thus, Neizvestnykh et al. [52] reported that transosseous osteosynthesis was performed to treat three (21.42%) of 14 newborns with femur fractures that occurred during delivery. The indications for surgery included an open fracture of the femoral limb segment (one case) and significant angular deformity of the hip (two cases). According to the investigators, in these cases, use of an external fixation device enabled satisfactory achievement of bone fragment position, facilitated care for an injured child, and reduced the period of fracture consolidation.

Use of the Mini Penning Orthex external fixation device in newborns with femur fractures can be indicated in cases where traditional treatment methods cannot be applied for any reason [53]. These cases can include during clinical observations, when a child who suffered a femur fracture is scheduled for medical manipulations, such as surgery, where the abdominal organs and functioning traction or a coxofemoral plaster bandage will significantly impede abdominal intervention [31]. When performing transosseous osteosynthesis in newborns, inflammatory complications inherent in this method of treatment should be considered first, as they occur in of up to 40% of cases in pediatric practice [54].

When determining the therapeutic approach to femur fractures in young children, one should focus on the study conducted by Strohm et al. [55], who analyzed the therapeutic approach for 756 femur fractures in children younger than 3 years at clinics in Germany. The frequency of use of conservative and surgical methods of treatment in injured children was approximately the same, namely, 49% and 51% of clinical cases, respectively. Thus, the dynamics clearly can be traced to increasingly active surgical tactics in providing traumatologic care to young patients with femur fractures.

The terms of consolidation of femur fractures in newborns ranged from 3 [14, 16] to 6 [50] weeks. As a rule, the treatment results satisfied the attending physicians. Valgus up to 3° and recurvation up to 5° were considered tolerable deviations of the femoral segment axis [50]. However, for deformities exceeding these values, then the specialists followed the expectant management with follow up of the patient and relied on the compensatory capabilities of the body [11, 51].

Regarding surgical interventions in children during the neonatal period, information in the literature concerning the consequences of these surgical interventions should be cited. Golomidov et al. [56] indicated that delayed neuropsychic development and impairments in implementation of the genetic growth program, manifested by backwardness in physical development, are typical consequences for the operated neonates. In addition, infants who have undergone surgery may experience abnormalities in the functioning of vital body systems; however, they are tolerated well by young children [57].

According to Shastin [58], current trends toward an increase in the frequency of surgical interventions in treatment of bone fractures in young children require further analysis and understanding. On one hand, the emergence of new technologies of metallic osteosynthesis under the control of an electron and optical converter, according to the author, simplified the technique of repositioning and stabilization of fractures, which ultimately had a positive effect on the quality of life of the operated children. On the other hand, surgeries often are performed in cases where conservative treatment methods can be sufficient, but for various reasons, surgical methods are preferred.


Analysis of modern medical literature shows that, despite the development and improvement of various areas of perinatal medicine, many issues remain unresolved [59, 60]. With regard to pediatric traumatology, the problem of providing specialized care to newborns who suffer long tubular bone fractures is of current importance, with elaboration of the generally accepted diagnostic and treatment tactics of actions of pediatric orthopedic traumatologists.

The literature review presented replenishes the existing gap in generalizing scientific publications on the treatment of limb fractures in

Additional information

Source of funding. This work was conducted within the research project of the Tyumen State Medical University.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no evident and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

Contribution of the authors

E.G. Scriabin was involved in search for scientific articles in the electronic medical information databases MEDLINE, Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory, DOAJ, Cyberleninka, and eLibrary; analysis of literary sources; and writing the text of the manuscript.

M.A. Akselrov performed search for scientific articles in the electronic medical information database PabMed and conducted analysis of literary sources.


About the authors

Evgeny G. Skryabin

Tyumen State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4128-6127
SPIN-code: 4125-9422
Scopus Author ID: 6507261198
ResearcherId: J-1627-2018

MD, PhD, Professor of the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics with a Course in Pediatric Traumatology

Russian Federation, 54, Odesskaya street, Tyumen, 625023

Mikhail A. Akselrov

Tyumen State Medical University; Regional clinical hospital № 2

ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6814-8894
SPIN-code: 3127-9804

MD, PhD, head of the Department of Pediatric Surgery Tyumen State Medical University. Head of the Children’s Surgery Department No. 1 of the State Unitary Enterprise “OKB No. 2”

Russian Federation, 54, Odesskaya street, Tyumen, 625023; 75, Melnikayte str., Tyumen, 625039


  1. Юхнова О.М., Пономарева Г.А., Скрябин Е.Г. Клиника, диагностика, лечение и профилактика интранатальных повреждений костей конечностей у новорожденных. – Тюмень, 1990. [Yukhnova OM, Ponomareva GA, Skryabin EG. Klinika, diagnostika, lechenie i profilaktika intranatal’nykh povrezhdeniy kostey konechnostey u novorozhdennykh. Tyumen; 1990. (In Russ.)]
  2. Маисеенко Д.А., Полонская О.В. Родовая травма новорожденного: проблема акушерства и неонатологии // РМЖ. Мать и дитя. – 2016. – Т. 24. – № 15. – С. 998–1000. [Maiseenko DA. Polonskaya OV. Rodovaya travma novorozhdennogo: problema akusherstva i neonatologii. RMZh. Mat’ i ditya. 2016;24(15):998-1000. (In Russ)].
  3. Lopez E, de Courtivron B, Saliba E. Neonatal complications related to shoulder dystocia. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2015;44(10):1294-1302. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.049.
  4. Дадали Е.Л., Шаркова И.В., Бессонова Л.А., и др. Случай диагностики проксимальной амиотрофии с врожденными переломами // Нервно-мышечные болезни. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 67–69. [Dadali EL, Sharkova IV, Bessonova LA, et al. A case of diagnosis of proximal spinal amyotrophy with congenital fractures. Neuromuscular diseases. 2012;(3):67-69. (In Russ.)]
  5. Abbott M, Jain M, Pferdehirt R, et al. Neonatal fractures as a presenting feature of LMOD3-associated congenital myopathy. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173(10):2789-2794. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38383.
  6. Al Kazan, Faverly D, Vamos E, et al. Lethal osteopetrosis with multiplae fractures in utero. Am J Med Genet. 1986;23(3):811-819. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320230308.
  7. Yimgang DP, Brizola E, Shapiro JR. Health outcomes of neonates with osteogenesis imperfecta: a cross-sectional study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(23):3889-3893. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1151870.
  8. Ayadi ID, Hamida EB, Rebeh RB, et al. Perunatal tipe II osteogenesis imperfecta: a case report. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;5(21):11. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.11.6834.
  9. Machado A, Rocha G, Silva A. Bone fractures in a neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Med Port. 2015;28(2):204-208.
  10. Paterson CR, Monk EA. Clinical and laboratory features of temporary brittle bone disease. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2014;27(1-2):37-47. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2013-0120.
  11. Rahul P, Grover AR, Ajoy SM. Bilateral Humerus and Right Fracture in a Newborn after Cesarean Section for Breech Presentation in a Twin Pregnancy: A Very case Report. J Orthop Case Rep. 2017;7(1):9-11. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.664.
  12. Matsubara S, Izumi A, Nagai T, et al. Femur fracture during abdominal breech delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(2):195-197. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0655-y.
  13. Farikou I, Bernadette NN, Daniel HE, et al. Fracture of the Femur of а Newborn after Cesarean Section for Breech Presentation and Fibroid Uteris: A Case Report and Literature Review. J Orthop Case Reports. 2014;4(1):18-20. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.141.
  14. Erdem Y, Akpancar S, Gemci MH. Bilateral Femoral Fracture in a newborn with Myelomeningocele at Cesarion section: A Case Report. J Orthop Case Rep. 2016;6(3):80-81. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.522.
  15. Cebesoy FB, Cebesoy O, Incebylik A. Bilateral femur fracture a newborn: an extreme complication of cesarean delivery. Arch Genecol Obstet. 2009;279(1):73-74. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0639-y.
  16. Kancheria R, Sankineani RS, Naranje S, et al. Birth-related femoral fractures in newborns: risk factors and management. J Child Orthop. 2012;6(3):177-180. doi: 10.1007/s11832-012-0412-4.
  17. Парилов С.Л., Сикорская А.К., Гайфуллина Л.Р. Биомеханизм родовой травмы плода в ходе операции кесарева сечения // Судебная медицина. – 2016. – Т. 2. – № 1. – С. 14–17. [Parilov SL, Sikorskaya AK, Gayfullina LR. Biomekhanizm rodovoy travmy ploda v khode operatsii kesareva secheniya. Russian Journal of Forensic Medicine. 2016;2(1):14-17. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.19048/2411-8729-2016-2-1-14-17.
  18. Linder N, Linder I, Fridman E, et al. Birth trauma-risk factors and short-term neonatal outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(15):1491-1495. doi: 10/3109/14767058.2013.789850.
  19. Jovanovic N, Ristovska N, Bogdanovic Z, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of rib fracture during spontaneous vaginal delivery. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2013;141(7-8):528-531.
  20. Dias E. Bilateral Humerus Fracture Following Birth Trauma. J Clin Neonatal. 2012;1(1):44-45. doi: 10.4103/2249-4847.92230.
  21. Capobianco G, Virdis G, Lisai P, et al. Cesarean section and right femur fracture: a rare but possible complication for breech presentation. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2013:613709. doi: 10.1155/2013/613709.
  22. Basha A, Amarin Z, Abu-Hassan. F Birth-associated long-bone fractures. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2013;123(2):127-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.013.
  23. Ratti C, Guindani N, Riva G, et al. Transphyseal elbow fracture in newborn: review of literature. Musculoskelet Surg. 2015;99:99-105. doi: 10.1007/s12306-015-0366-z.
  24. Toker A, Perry ZH, Cohem E, et al. Cesarion section and the risk of fractured femur. Isr Med Assoc. 2009;11(7):416-418.
  25. Papp S, Dhaliwal G, Davies G, et al. Fetal femur fracture and external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(5):1154-1156. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000128112.33398.31.
  26. Miller M, Ward T, Stolfi A, et al. Overrepresentation of multiple birth pregnancies in young infants with four metabolic bone loading is a critical determinant of fetal and young infant bone strength. Osteoporosis. 2014;25(7):1861-1873. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2690-9.
  27. Сафина А.И. Остеопения недоношенных // Вестник современной клинической медицины. – 2013. – Т. 6. – № 6. – С. 114–119. [Safina AI. Osteopenia of prematurity. Bulletin of contemporary clinical medicine. 2013;6(6):114-119. (In Russ.)]
  28. Handel MN, Frederiksen P, Cohen A, et al. Neonatal vitamin D status from archived dried blood spots and future risk of fractures in childhood: results from the D-test study, a population-based case-cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106(1):155-161. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.145599.
  29. Chin L.K, Doan J, Teoh YS, et al. Outcomes of standardised approach to metabolic bone disease of prematurity. J Pediatr Child Health. 2018;2. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13813.
  30. Debezies E, Warren P. Fractures in very low birth weight infants with rickets. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;225:233-239.
  31. Скрябин Е.Г., Сорокин М.А., Аксельров М.А., и др. Клинический случай применения метода интрамедуллярного остеосинтеза в лечении патологического перелома бедренной кости у 6-дневной новорожденной девочки с высокой частичной кишечной непроходимостью // Ортопедия, травматология и восстановительная хирургия детского возраста. – 2017. – Т. 5. – № 2. – С. 52–58. [Skryabin EG, Sorokin MA, Aksel’rov MA, et al. Clinical case for the use of intramedullary osteosynthesis in the treatment of pathological fractures of the femur in 6-day newborn girls with a high partial intestinal obstruction. Pediatric traumatology, orthopaedics and reconstructive surgery. 2017;5(2):52-58. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.17816/PTORS5252-58.
  32. Емельянова В.А., Аксельров А.М. Врожденная непроходимость пищевода (обзор литературы) // Медицинская наука и образование Урала. – 2018. – Т. 19. – № 1. – С. 170–175. [Emelyanova VA, Akselrov MA. Congenital obstruction of esophagial. Historical moments (literature review). Meditsinskaia nauka i obrazovanie Urala. 2018;19(1):170-175. (In Russ.)]
  33. Gnateyko OZ, Nakonechna KB, Lychkovska OL, Kech NR. Bone system status in children with gastroduodenal pathology. Paediatric Surgery. 2017;4(57):103-107. doi: 10.15574/PS.2017.57.103.
  34. McDevitt H, Ahmed SF. Quantitative ultrasound assessment of bone health in the neonate. Neonatology. 2007;91(1):2-11. doi: 10.1159/000096965.
  35. Mane PP, Challawar NS, Shah H. Late presented case of distal humerus epiphyseal separation in a newborn. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;2016. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2016-215296.
  36. Удовика Н.А., Манищенков С.Н., Леонов А.А. Анализ течения родов у женщин, потужной период которых осложнился дистоцией плечиков // Акушерство, гинекология, репродуктология. – 2014. – Т. 8. – № 3. – С. 22–25. [Udovika NA, Manishchenkov SN, Leonov AA. Analysis of the course of labor in women, the second stage, which was complicated by shoulder dystocia. Akusherstvo, ginekologiya, reproduktologiya. 2014;8(3):22-25. (In Russ.)]
  37. Gittens-Williams L. Contemporary Management of Shoulder Dystocia. Women’s Health. 2010;6(6):861-869. doi: 10.2217/whe.10.65.
  38. Буйненко Н.В. Клиника и ведение родов при дистоции плечиков // Медицина и экология. – 2012. – № 1. – С. 7–11. [Buynenko NV. Klinika i vedeniye rodov pri distotsii plechikov. Meditsina i ekologiya. 2012;(1):7-11. (In Russ.)]
  39. Мочалова М.Н., Пономарева Ю.Н., Мудров В.А., и др. Современные методы диагностики и прогнозирования клинически узкого таза // Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. – 2016. – Т. 65. – № 5. – С. 82–91. [Mochalova MN, Ponomareva YN, Mudrov VA, et al. Modern methods of diagnosis and prognosis fetal-pelvic disproportion. Journal of obstetrics and women’s diseases. 2016;65(5):82-91. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.17816/JOWD65582-91.
  40. Gigante C, Kini SC, Origo K, et al. Transphyseal separation of the distal humerus in newborns. Chin J Traumatol. 2017;20(3):183-186. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.04.003.
  41. Verhees RA, Besselaar AT, van Aken MH, et al. A neonatal supracondylar humeral fracture resembling a plexus injury. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2016;160:9427.
  42. Sherr-Lurie N, Bialik GM, Ganel A, et al. Fractures of the humerus in the neonatal period. Isr Med Assoc J. 2011;13(6):363-365.
  43. Tharakan SJ, Lee RJ, White AM, et al. Distal Humeral Epiphyseal Separation in a Newborn. Orthopedics. 2016;39(4):764-767. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160503-01.
  44. Крюкова И.А., Хусаинов Н.О., Баиндурашвили А.Г., и др. Рекомендательный протокол оказания медицинской помощи при родовой травме плечевого сплетения у детей первых месяцев жизни // Ортопедия, травматология и восстановительная хирургия детского возраста. –2016. – Т. 4. – № 1. – С. 72–77. [Kryukova IA, Khusainov NO, Baindurashvili AG, et al. Algorithm for treatment of children of first months of life with brachial plexus birth palsy. Pediatric traumatology, orthopaedics and reconstructive surgery. 2016;4(1):72-77. (In Russ.)]. doi: 10.17816/PTORS4172-77.
  45. Morris S, Cassidy N, Stephens M, et al. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22(1):27-30. doi: 10.1097/00004694-200201000-00007.
  46. Rijal L, Ansari T, Trikha V, et al. Birth injuries in caesarian sections: cases of fracture femur and humerus following caesarian section. Nepal Med Coll J. 2009;11(3):207-208.
  47. Carcia Garcia IE, de la Vega A, Carcia Flagoso L. Long bone fractures in extreme low birth weight infants at birth: obstetrical considerations. P R Healt Sci J. 2002;21(3):253-255.
  48. Munoz-Ortuz JM, Downey-Carmona FJ, Tatal-Diaz A, et al. Physeal fracture of the distal femur in a newborn: role of arthrography. Am J Orthop. 2013;42(2):14-15.
  49. Podeszwa DA, Mooney JF, Cramer KE. Comparison of Pavlik harness application and immediate spica casting for femur fractures in infants. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24(5):460-462. doi: 1097/00004694-200409000-00002.
  50. Ruch JK, Kelly DM, Sawyer JR. Treatment of pediatric femur fractures with the Pavlik harness: multiyear clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(6):614-617. doi: 10.1097/BPO.ob013e318292464a.
  51. Masmoudi K, Mtaoumi M, Bouattour K, et al. Neonatal leg fracture and constriction ring syndrome: A case report and literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(7):955-958. doi: 10.1016/j.btsr.2016.07.008.
  52. Неизвестных Е.А., Банщиков М.А., Котляров А.Н., и др. Оптимизация тактики лечения переломов бедренных костей у новорожденных // Вестник Российского государственного медицинского университета. – 2010. – № 3S1. – С. 33–34. [Neizvestnykh EA, Banshchikov MA, Kotlyarov AN, et al. Optimizatsiya taktiki lecheniya perelomov bedrennykh kostey u novorozhdennykh. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2010;(3S1):33-34. (In Russ.)]
  53. D’Andrea L, Catena N. Femural shaft fracture in a newborn infant treated with axial external fixator: a case report. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(1):17-19. doi: 10.1097/bpo.0b013e31815b4dea.
  54. Петров А.Г., Акинфеев А.В., Соколов А.О. Критерии выбора рациональной лечебной тактики при переломах длинных трубчатых костей у детей // Здравоохранение Чувашии. – 2014. – № 2. – С. 51–55. [Petrov AG, Akinfeev AV, Sokolov AO. Kriterii vybora ratsionalnoy lechebnoy taktiki pri perelomakh dlinnykh trubchatykh kostey u detey. Zdravookhraneniye Chuvashii. 2014;(2):51-55. (In Russ.)]
  55. Strohm PC, Schmittenbecher PP. Femoral shaft fractures in children under 3 yeares old. Current treatment standard. Unfallchirurg. 2015;118(1):48-52. doi: 10.1007/s00113-014-2639-7.
  56. Голомидов А.В., Сутулина И.М., Черных А.А. Особенности развития детей, перенесших в неонатальном периоде хирургические вмешательства // X конгресс педиатров России «Актуальные проблемы педиатрии»; 6–9 февраль 2006, Москва. – М., 2006.[Golomidov AV, Sutulina IM, Chernykh AA. Osobennosti razvitiya detey. perenesshikh v neonatalnom periode khirurgicheskiye vmeshatelstva. In: Proceedings of the 10th Congress of Pediatricians of Russia “Aktualnyye problemy pediatrii”; 2006 Feb 6-9, Moscow. Moscow; 2006. (In Russ.)]
  57. Козлов Ю.А., Новожилов В.А., Ковалев В.М. Физиологические основы возможности применения минимально инвазивной хирургии у новорожденных и детей первых трех месяцев жизни // Сибирский медицинский журнал. – 2013. – № 5. – С. 17–32. [Kozlov YuA, Novozhilov VA, Kovalev VM. Fiziologicheskiye osnovy vozmozhnosti primeneniya minimalno invazivnoy khirurgii u novorozhdennykh i detey pervykh trekh mesyatsev zhizni. Sibirskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2013;(5):17-32. (In Russ.)]
  58. Шастин Н.П. Современные тенденции в лечение переломов костей у детей // Материалы XI Всероссийского съезда травматологов-ортопедов; 11–13 апреля 2018, Санкт-Петербург. – СПб., 2018. – С. 1120–1122. [Shastin NP. Sovremennyye tendentsii v lecheniye perelomov kostey u detey. In: Proceedings of the 9th All-Russian Congress of Orthopedic Traumatology; 11-13 Apr 2018, Saint Petersburg. Saint Petersburg; 2018. p. 1120-1122. (In Russ.)]
  59. Томова М.Б. Инновационное развитие медицины в Российской Федерации // Вестник университета. – 2017. – № 3. – С. 165–168. [Tomova MB. Innovative development of medicine in the Russian Federation. University Bulletin. 2017;(3):165-168. (In Russ.)]
  60. Алексеенко Н.Ю. Основные проблемы и перспективы выхаживания детей с очень низкой и экстремальной низкой массой тела при рождении (обзор литературы) // Символ науки. – 2017. – № 1–2. – С. 158–163. [Alekseenko NY. The main problems and prospects for nursing children with very low and extreme low birth weight (literature review). Symbol of Science. 2017;(1-2):158-163. (In Russ.)]

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.

Copyright (c) 2018 Skryabin E.G., Akselrov M.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies