Triceps surae shortening in children

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The triceps surae is the main muscle that exerts propulsion power during walking and running. Its retraction changes the biomechanics of the foot, alters locomotion, and results in the secondary development of flatfoot deformity. Literature data on the clinical assessment of triceps surae retraction vary.

AIM: To assess the threshold value of foot dorsiflexion in different clinical assessment methods of determining Achilles tendon shortening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included the clinical assessment results of foot dorsiflexion in 167 patients (325 feet) with flatfeet aged 7–18 years. The foot dorsiflexion evaluation consisted of the assessment of isolated foot dorsiflexion and foot dorsiflexion with stabilization of the tarsal joints. To determine the involvement of the gastrosoleus complex in the pathological process, foot dorsiflexion was assessed with knee joint flexion and extension. The obtained data were subjected to correlation, regression, and Bland–Altman analyses.

RESULTS: Strong correlations were found when foot dorsiflexion was assessed with the same knee joint position (assessment of isolated foot dorsiflexion and foot dorsiflexion with stabilized tarsal joints and knee joint flexion; the same tests with knee joint extension). Moderate correlations were noted when comparing foot dorsiflexion with knee joint extension and flexion. In the regression analysis, formulas were obtained according to which the threshold values of foot dorsiflexion were calculated in various variants during knee joint flexion and extension, indicating the retraction of the triceps surae: isolated foot dorsiflexion with knee joint extension <20°, isolated foot dorsiflexion with knee flexion <36°, and foot dorsiflexion with tarsal joint stabilization and knee extension <23°.

CONCLUSIONS: Retraction of triceps surae in children with flatfeet equally involves the gastrocnemius and soleus. Differences in the magnitude of foot dorsiflexion with knee joint flexion and extension are the main factors in the retraction of the triceps surae to the gastrocnemius muscle.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Andrey V. Sapogovskiy

H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery

Author for correspondence.
Email: sapogovskiy@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5762-4477
SPIN-code: 2068-2102

MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, 64-68 Parkovaya str., Pushkin, Saint Petersburg, 196603

References

  1. Yong JR, Dembia CL, Silder A, et al. Foot strike pattern during running alters muscle-tendon dynamics of the gastrocnemius and the soleus. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1). doi: 0.1038/s41598-020-62464-3
  2. Zelik KE, Huang TW, Adamczyk PG, et al. The role of series ankle elasticity in bipedal walking. J Theor Biol. 2014;346:75–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.12.014
  3. Zhang X, Deng L, Xiao S, et al. Morphological and viscoelastic properties of the Achilles tendon in the forefoot, rearfoot strike runners, and non-runners in vivo. Front Physiol. 2023;14. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1256908
  4. Blazevich AJ, Fletcher JR. More than energy cost: multiple benefits of the long Achilles tendon in human walking and running. Biol Rew. 2023;98(3). doi: 10.1111/brv.13002
  5. Matijevich ES, Branscombe LM, Zelik KE. Ultrasound estimates of Achilles tendon exhibit unexpected shortening during ankle plantarflexion. J Biomech. 2018;72:200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.03.013
  6. Fletcher JR, MacIntosh BR. Changes in Achilles tendon stiffness and energy cost following a prolonged run in trained distance runners. PLoS One. 2018;13(8). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202026
  7. Werkhausen A, Cronin NJ, Albracht K, et al. Training-induced increase in Achilles tendon stiffness affects tendon strain pattern during running. Peer J. 2019;7. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6764
  8. McHugh MP, Orishimo KF, Kremenic IJ, et al. Electromyographic evidence of excessive Achilles tendon elongation during isometric contractions after Achilles tendon repair. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7(11). doi: 10.1177/2325967119883357
  9. DiGiovanni CW, Langer P. The role of isolated gastrocnemius and combined Achilles contractures in the flatfoot. Foot Ankle Clin. 2007;12(2):363–379. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2007.03.005
  10. Domarev AO, Klochkova OA, Kenis VM. Congenital hypoplasia of the triceps surae muscle as a cause of rigid equinus deformity of the foot in a 1.5 year old child: clinical observation. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2022;12(S):45–46. EDN: ELUOLY
  11. Bouchard M, Mosca VS. Flatfoot deformity in children and adolescents: surgical indications and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(10):623–632. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-10-623
  12. Dimitrieva AYu, Kenis VM. Medium-term results of body balance trainings in primary school-aged children with generalized joint hypermobility and symptomatic mobile flat foot: cohort study. Pediatric Pharmacology. 2021;18(5):346–358. EDN: YVHYML doi: 10.15690/pf.v18i5.2326
  13. Kenis VM, Khusainov NO. The use of shoe type “squeakers” in children with idiopathic transient toe walking. L.O. Badalyan Neurological Journal. 2020;1(4):217–223. EDN: FIFOBA doi: 10.17816/2686-8997-2020-1-4-217-223
  14. Iborra Marcos Á, Villanueva Martínez M, Fahandezh-Saddi Díaz H. Needle-based gastrocnemius lengthening: a novel ultrasound-guided noninvasive technique. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03318-8
  15. Cohen JC. Anatomy and biomechanical aspects of the gastrocsoleus complex. Foot Ankle Clin. 2009;14(4):617–626. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2009.08.006

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Methods for determining dorsiflexion of the foot in various variants: a - dorsiflexion with extension of the knee joint; b — dorsiflexion with flexion of the knee joint; c - dorsiflexion with extension of the first finger and extension of the knee joint; d - dorsiflexion with extension of the first finger and flexion of the knee joint

Download (271KB)
3. Fig. 2. Scheme for calculating the sample size when conducting a study

Download (84KB)
4. Fig. 3. Correlation matrix between the studied parameters

Download (316KB)
5. Fig. 4. Differences in the used options for assessing dorsiflexion of the foot: a - studied options for dorsiflexion of the foot during extension of the knee joint; b — studied variants of dorsiflexion of the foot when flexing the knee joint; c — flexion and extension of the knee joint with isolated dorsiflexion; d - flexion and extension of the knee joint during dorsiflexion with extension of the first finger

Download (361KB)
6. Fig. 5. Graphs of regression models for calculating the threshold values of dorsiflexion of the foot during retraction of the triceps surae: a - graph of a regression model for a pair of parameters “dorsiflexion (extension of the knee joint) - dorsiflexion with extension of the first finger (extension of the knee joint)”; b — graph of the regression model for the pair of parameters “dorsiflexion (flexion of the knee joint) - dorsiflexion (extension of the knee joint)”; c — graph of the regression model for the pair of parameters “dorsiflexion with extension of the first finger (flexion of the knee joint) - dorsiflexion with extension of the first finger (extension of the knee joint).” CI—confidence interval; PI - predictive interval

Download (416KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Эко-Вектор

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС77-54261 от 24 мая 2013 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies