Slipped capital femoral epiphysis in children engaged in sports

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epiphysis displacement factors in slipped capital femoral epiphysis are defined as an external mechanical impact on the affected joint of different orientation and intensity, the nature of which may determine the type, direction, and severity of epiphysis displacement. There may be differences in the immediate causes of dislocation and in the nature of the course and timing of detection of the disease in children who were engaged in sports compared to those who were not engaged in sports. Identifying these differences may be beneficial for preventing the occurrence of epiphyseal displacement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

AIM: To determine the immediate causes of epiphyseal displacement and the peculiarities of the course of SCFE in children practicing sports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 256 patients aged 11–14 years with slipped capital femoral epiphysis who were admitted at our center, from whom 68 patients were subsequently selected. The main group included 34 children who were engaged in sports and whose first symptoms of the disease appeared during training. The control group included 34 children who were not engaged in sports activities and whose first symptoms of the disease appeared for no apparent reason. Clinical, radiologic, and statistical methods of research were used.

RESULTS: In the main group, no severe forms of slipped capital femoral epiphysis such as bilateral displacement, acute displacement with chronic displacement, and early complications of the disease were noted, whereas in the control group, the number of patients with such conditions was 6 (17.6%), 4 (11.8%), and 1 (2.9%), respectively. Additionally, in 2 (5.9%) children of the main group, an extremely rare “valgus” displacement of the epiphysis was detected. Both cases occurred in gymnast girls owing to the use of a special “split” sitting technique.

CONCLUSIONS: Severe forms of slipped capital femoral epiphysis are less frequent in children who practiced sports than in those who were not engaged in sports. This is associated with earlier medical attention. “Valgus” displacement of the epiphysis is more common in children with slipped capital femoral epiphysis who practiced sports than in those who did not do sports. This may be attributed to the use of some of the most traumatic exercises in the training process.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Dmitrii B. Barsukov

H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery

Author for correspondence.
Email: dbbarsukov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9084-5634
SPIN-code: 2454-6548

MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Pavel I. Bortulev

H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery

Email: pavel.bortulev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4931-2817
SPIN-code: 9903-6861

MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Ivan Yu. Pozdnikin

H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery

Email: pozdnikin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7026-1586
SPIN-code: 3744-8613

MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Tamila V. Baskaeva

H. Turner National Medical Research Center for Сhildren’s Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery

Email: tamila-baskaeva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9865-2434
SPIN-code: 5487-4230

MD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Krechmar AN. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (clinic-experimental study) [dissertation abstract]. Leningrad; 1982. (In Russ.)
  2. Wensaas A, Svenningsen S, Terjesen T. Long-term outcome of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a 38-year follow-up of 66 patients. J Child Orthop. 2011;5(2)75−82. doi: 10.1007/s11832-010-0308-0
  3. Abraham E, Gonzalez MH, Pratap S, et al. Clinical implications of anatomical wear characteristics in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and primary osteoarthritis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(7):788–795. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181558c94
  4. Al-Nammari SS, Tibrewal S, Britton EM, et al. Management outcome and the role of manipulation in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Orthop Surg. (Hong Kong). 2008;16(1):131–132. doi: 10.1177/230949900801600134
  5. Krasnov AI. Juvenile slipped capital femoral epiphysis. In: Kotelnikov GP, Mironov SP, editors. Traumatology: national guidelines. 2nd ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2011. P. 989–994. (In Russ.)
  6. Nourbakhsh A, Ahmed HA, McAuliffe TB, et al. Case report: bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphyses and hormone replacement. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2008;466(3):743–748. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0099-x
  7. Shaw KA, Shiver AL, Oakes T, et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis associated with endocrinopathy: a narrative review. JBJS Rev. 2022;10(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.21.00188
  8. Bellemore JM, Carpenter EC, Yu NY, et al. Biomechanics of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: evaluation of the posterior sloping angle. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(6):651–655. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000512
  9. Mamisch TC, Kim YJ, Richolt JA, et al. Femoral morphology due to impingement influences the range of motion in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(3):692–698. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0477-z
  10. Green DW, Reynolds RA, Khan SN, et al. The delay in diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a review of 102 patients. HSS J. 2005;1(1):103–106. doi: 10.1007/s11420-005-0118-y
  11. Accadbled F, Murgier J, Delannes B, et al. In situ pinning in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: long-term follow-up studies. J Child Orthop. 2017;11(2):107−109. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.11.160282
  12. Swarup I, Shah R, Gohel S, et al. Predicting subsequent contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an evidence-based approach. J Child Orthop. 2020;14(2):91−97. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.200012
  13. Hellmich HJ, Krieg AH. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis-etiology and pathogenesis. Orthopade. 2019;48(8):644–650. (In Ger.) doi: 10.1007/s00132-019-03743-4
  14. Kocher MS, Tucker R. Pediatric athlete hip disorders. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25(2):241–253. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2006.01.001
  15. Broadley P, Offiah AC. Hip and groin pain in the child athlete. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014;18(5):478–488. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1389265
  16. Loder RT, Gunderson ZJ, Sun S, et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis associated with athletic activity. sports health. 2023;15(3):422–426. doi: 10.1177/19417381221093045
  17. Castillo C, Mendez M. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a review for pediatricians. Pediatr Ann. 2018;47(9):e377–e380. doi: 10.3928/19382359-20180730-01
  18. Bittersohl D, Bittersohl B, Westhoff B, et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: clinical presentation, diagnostic procedure and classification. Orthopade. 2019;48(8):651–658. (In German) doi: 10.1007/s00132-019-03767-w
  19. Cotton EV, Fowler SC, Maday KR. A review of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. JAAPA. 2022;35(12):39–43. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000892720.49955.c0
  20. Mathew SE, Larson AN. Natural history of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;39(6):S23–S27. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001369
  21. Stracciolini A, Yen YM, d’Hemecourt PA, et al. Sex and growth effect on pediatric hip injuries presenting to sports medicine clinic. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2016;25(4):315–321. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000315
  22. Assi C, Mansour J, Kouyoumdjian P, et al. Valgus slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a systematic review. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2021;30(2):116–122. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000758
  23. Gelink A, Cúneo A, Silveri C, et al. Valgus slipped capital femoral epiphysis: presentation, treatment, and clinical outcomes using patient-reported measurements. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2021;30(2):111–115. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000736
  24. Loder RT, Gunderson Z, Sun S. Idiopathic slipped capital femoral epiphysis: demographic differences and similarities between stable, unstable, and valgus types. Children (Basel). 2023;10(9):1557. doi: 10.3390/children10091557
  25. Almedaifer SF, AlShehri AJ, Alhussainan TS. Bilateral valgus slipped capital femoral epiphysis in an 11-year-old girl. Cureus. 2018;10(11):e3598. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3598
  26. Venkatadass K, Shetty AP, Rajasekaran S. Valgus slipped capital femoral epiphysis: report of two cases and a comprehensive review of literature. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2011;20(5):291–294. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e328346d2ec
  27. Blümel S, Leunig M, Manner H, et al. Avascular femoral head necrosis in young gymnasts: a pursuit of aetiology and management. Bone Jt Open. 2022;3(9):666–673. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.39.BJO-2022-0100.R1
  28. Larson AN, Kim HK, Herring JA. Female patients with late-onset Legg-Calve-Perthes disease are frequently gymnasts: is there a mechanical etiology for this subset of patients? J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(8):811–815. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000096

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Frontal (a) and Lauenstein pelvic radiographs of an 11-year-and-6-month-old female patient diagnosed with chronic epiphyseal displacement in an atypical direction (posterior and superior). Further details can be found in the text

Download (122KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Эко-Вектор



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС77-54261 от 24 мая 2013 г.