外侧释放切口双侧双蒂皮瓣结合Integra®真皮再生模板的大面积腰骶部缺损闭合术

封面


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

背景脊髓脊膜膨出是一种最复杂的先天性中枢神经系统发育畸形,是脊柱裂最常见的类型之一,涉及神经管闭合失败。脊髓脊膜膨出重建手术对整形外科和神经外科来说一直是项挑战。

临床病例。我们报告了在本中心接受治疗的一例患腰骶部脊膜膨出的新生儿。脊髓脊膜膨出由神经外科团队修复,术后患儿遗留下大面积腰骶部皮肤缺损。我们采用经外侧释放切口的双侧双蒂皮瓣成功覆盖大面积缺损,剩余的腰骶部和继发性缺损采用Integra®真皮再生模板(DRT)进行修复。自体表皮移植创面床的准备过程中,使用ACTICOAT连接负压伤口治疗(NPWT)作为主要敷料。该闭合技术提供了无张力的闭合。

讨论。我们结合双侧双蒂筋膜皮瓣技术和DRT闭合腰骶部缺损。经外侧释放切口的双侧双蒂皮瓣可减轻双侧腰部皮肤张力。DRT缩小了腰骶部缺损,NPWT敷料提供了理想的无菌环境,为新生真皮形成提供时间。利用DRT和自体皮肤移植对剩余的继发性缺损进行修复。

结论。手术结果表明,外侧释放切口双侧双蒂筋膜皮瓣与DRT伴延迟植皮联用安全有效,并为大面积暴露硬膜缺损提供长期稳定的柔软疤痕。

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Pauline Yap

Universiti Malaysia Sabah; Universiti Sains Malaysia

Email: paulineyap@live.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2228-3473

MD

马来西亚, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah; 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan

Arman Zaharil Mat Saad

Universiti Sains Malaysia; Management and Science University

Email: armanzaharil@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4003-6783

M.Sc., Professor

马来西亚, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan; Shah Alam, Selangor

Wan Azman Wan Sulaiman

Universiti Sains Malaysia

Email: wsazman@yahoo.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0600-9765

M.Sc., Professor

马来西亚, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan

Siti Fatimah Noor Mat Johar

Universiti Sains Malaysia

Email: fatimahmj@usm.my
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4120-4918

M.Sc.

马来西亚, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan

Nurul Syazana Mohamad Shah

Universiti Sains Malaysia

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: syazanashah@usm.my
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6731-9962

PhD

马来西亚, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan

参考

  1. Wallingford JB. Neural tube closure and neural tube defects: studies in animal models reveal known knowns and known unknowns. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2005;135C:59−68. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30054
  2. Shim JH, Hwang NH, Yoon ES, et al. Closure of myelomeningocele defects using a limberg flap or direct repair. Arch Plast Surg. 2016;43(1):26–31. doi: 10.5999/aps.2016.43.1.26
  3. Botto LD, Moore CA, Khoury MJ, et al. Neural-tube defects. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1509−1519. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199911113412006
  4. Greenberg F, James LM, Oakley GP Jr. Estimates of birth prevalence rates of spina bifida in the United States from computer-generated maps. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;145:570−573. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)91198-5
  5. Sahmat A, Gunasekaran R, Mohd-Zin SW, et al. The prevalence and distribution of spina bifida in a single major referral center in Malaysia. Front Pediatr. 2017;5:237. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00237
  6. Laurence KM. Effect of early surgery for spina bifida cystic on survival and quality of life. Lancet. 1974;1(7852):301−304. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)92606-3
  7. McDowell MM, Blatt JE, Deibert CP, et al. Predictors of mortality in children with myelomeningocele and symptomatic Chiari type II malformation. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;21(6):587–596. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.PEDS17496
  8. Habibi Z, Nejat F. Myelomeningocele defect closure. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014;30:2001. doi: 10.1007/s00381-014-2550-0
  9. Kobraei EM, Ricci JA, Vasconez HC, Rinker BD. A comparison of techniques for myelomeningocele defect closure in the neonatal period. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014;30:1535–1541.
  10. Adzick NS. Fetal surgery for spina bifida: past, present, future. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2013;22:10−7. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2012.10.003
  11. Patterson TJ. The use of rotation flaps following excision of lumbar myelo-meningoceles: an aid to the closure of large defects. Br J Surg. 1959;46:606−608.
  12. El-Sabbagh AH, Zidan AS. Closure of large myelomeningocele by lumbar artery perforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011;27:287−294. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275492
  13. Cöloğlu H, Ozkan B, Uysal AC, et al. Bilateral propeller flap closure of large meningomyelocele defects. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(1):68−73. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31826caf5a
  14. Emsen IM. Closure of large myelomeningocele defects using the O-S flap technique. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(7):2167−2170. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002154
  15. Banda CH, Narushima M, Ishiura R, et al. Local flaps with negative pressure wound therapy in secondary reconstruction of myelomeningocele wound necrosis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(12):e2012. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002012
  16. Lobo GJ, Nayak M. V-Y plasty or primary repair closure of myelomeningocele: Our experience. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2018;13(4):398–403. doi: 10.4103/JPN.JPN_40_18
  17. Nejat F, Baradaran N, Khashab ME. Large myelomeningocele repair. Indian J Plast Surg. 2011;44(1):87–90. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.81453

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. 图 1 初始伤口:脊髓脊膜膨出修复后暴露的9×4.5 cm 的大面积腰骶部缺损。伤口中央显露已修复的裸露硬膜

下载 (166KB)
3. 图 2 皮瓣设计:在腋后线以1:2比例制作外侧释放切口的双蒂双侧皮瓣。皮肤破坏至深筋膜

下载 (118KB)
4. 图 2 皮瓣设计:在腋后线以1:2比例制作外侧释放切口的双蒂双侧皮瓣。皮肤破坏至深筋膜

下载 (101KB)
5. 图 4 Integra®应用后两周。创面床显示新真皮与真皮再生模板整合,迹象良好。硅胶层完好

下载 (109KB)
6. 图 5 硅胶层移除后的创面床。初次手术后三周,伤口床处肉芽组织良好,伤口边缘上皮化。腰骶部伤口缩小至7×4 cm

下载 (104KB)
7. 图 6 自体皮肤移植。成熟新真皮上进行自体表皮皮片移植

下载 (107KB)
8. 图 7 术后1年。伤口似已愈合。腰骶部皮肤柔软

下载 (90KB)

版权所有 © Yap P., Mat Saad A., Wan Sulaiman W., Mat Johar S., Mohamad Shah N., 2021

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名 4.0国际许可协议的许可

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС77-54261 от 24 мая 2013 г.


##common.cookie##