Prosthetic liner-socket design for children with long congenital and amputated shoulder

Anton V. Kruglov; Круглов Антон Вячеславович; Gregory A. Lein; Леин Григорий Аркадьевич

doi:10.17816/PTORS75653

儿童长上臂残余肢体的套筒衬垫设计研究

作者: Kruglov A.V.¹^,2, Lein G.A.²
隶属关系:
1. LLC North-West scientific-practical center of rehabilitation and prosthetics “Ortetika”
2. LLC prosthetic and orthopedic center “Scoliologic.ru”
期: 卷 9, 编号 4 (2021)
页面: 427-434
栏目: Original Study Article
##submission.dateSubmitted##: 05.07.2021
##submission.dateAccepted##: 11.11.2021
##submission.datePublished##: 15.12.2021
URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/turner/article/view/75653
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PTORS75653
ID: 75653

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取

##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问

订阅或者付费存取

详细
全文:
作者简介
参考
补充文件
统计

详细

论证。传统的儿童长上臂残肢的美容假体设计有几个缺点，如不舒服和僵硬的假体套筒，需要带状固定，以及由于肩部和前臂的长度与残肢不相称而导致产品不一致等。

本研究的目的是开发、制造及测试一种用于肩部残肢的套筒衬假体原型。

材料与方法。已开发出一种新的肩部美容假体的套筒衬垫，并得到俄罗斯发明专利的确认，在国内假体实践中首次采用两种不同类型的硅胶制成，并已成功用于17名儿童的美容假体中，其中10人以前曾使用过传统的长桩假肢。与传统设计相比，使用心理测量表分析了对新的套筒衬垫的满意度。

结果。所开发的设计既结合了套筒的功能，使肘关节可以连接在上面，又结合了衬垫的特性，由于采用了硅胶，确保残余肢体在套筒中保持舒适，并消除了传统结扎紧固件的使用。

结论。所提出的医疗技术解决方案可以在不影响相对于健康肢体的比例以及佩戴舒适度的情况下，在残余肢体（包括长残余肢体）上轻松而安全地固定美容假体。

关键词

减轻肩部缺陷, 假体, 肩部美容假体, 套筒衬垫, 儿科假体, 先天性畸形

全文:

作者简介

Anton Kruglov

LLC North-West scientific-practical center of rehabilitation and prosthetics “Ortetika”; LLC prosthetic and orthopedic center “Scoliologic.ru”

Email: kruglov@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3811-5773
SPIN 代码: 3312-5350
https://www.instagram.com/kruglov_scoliologic/

MD, PhD, The Head of upper limb prosthetic department

俄罗斯联邦, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Gregory Lein

LLC prosthetic and orthopedic center “Scoliologic.ru”

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: lein@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7904-8688

MD, PhD

俄罗斯联邦, Saint Petersburg

参考

Rukovodstvo po protezirovaniyu i ortezirovaniyu. In 2 vol. Ed. by M.A. Dyimochka, A.I. Suhoverova, BG Spivak. 3rd ed. Moscow; 2016. (In Russ.)
Reabilitaciya invalidov: nacional’noe rukovodstvo. Ed. by G.N. Ponomarenko. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2018. (In Russ.)
Reabilitaciya invalidov: nacional’noe rukovodstvo. Kratkoe izdanie. Ed. by G.N. Ponomarenko. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2020. (In Russ.)
Zamilackij YuI, SHCHerbina KK, Andrievskaya AO, et al. Konstrukcii protezov verhnih konechnostej: uchebnoe posobie. Ed. by G.N. Ponomarenko. Saint Peterburg: CIACAN; 2019. (In Russ.)
Zamilackij YuI, SHCHerbina KK, Suslyaev VG, et al. Tekhnologiya izgotovleniya priemnyh gil’z protezov verhnih konechnostej: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. Ed. by G.N. Ponomarenko. Saint Peterburg: CIACAN; 2019. (In Russ.)
Gil’za-lajner dlya kul’ti plecha: pat. 2721540 RF, MPK A61F2/54. A.V. Kruglov, G.A. Lein; patentoobladatel’: Skoliolodzhik.ru. No. 2019137451; zayavl. 21 Nov 2019; opubl. 19 May 2020. (In Russ.)
Ponomarenko GN, Shcherbina KK, Golubeva YB, Galaudina VV. On the quality of prosthetic and orthopedic appliances. Standards and Quality. 2020;(2):94−99. (In Russ.)
Smirnova LM, Shcherbina KK, Galaudina VV, Golubeva YB. A regulatory framework for the quality assessment of prosthetics. Standards and Quality. 2019;(6):46−51.
Salminger S, Stino H, Pichler LH, et al. Current rates of prosthetic usage in upper-limb amputees- have innovations had an impact on device acceptance? Disabil Rehabil. 2020:1−12. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020/1866684
Brack R, Amalu EH. A review of technology, materials and R&D challenges of upper limb prosthesis for improved user suitability. J Orthop. 2020;23:88−96. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.009
Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosth Orthot Int. 2007;31(3):236−257. doi: 10.1080/03093640600994581
Kyberd PJ, Hill W. Survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Canada. Prosth Orthot Int. 2011;35(2):234−241. doi: 10.1177/0309364611409099
Stephens-Fripp В, Walker MJ, Goddard E, et al. A survey on what Australians with upper limb difference want in a prosthesis: justification for using soft robotics and additive manufacturing for customized prosthetic hands. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(3):342−349. doi: 10.1080/17483107. 2019.1580777
Sims T, Cranny A, Metcalf Ch, et al. Participatory design of pediatric upper limb prostheses: qualitative methods and prototyping. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33(6):629−637. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000836