Email this article 
Urethral erosion developed after implantation of artificial urinary sphincter
- Authors: Kyzlasov P.S.1, Mustafaev A.T.1, Kazantsev D.V.1, Volokitin E.V.2
-
Affiliations:
- State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia
- Podgorbunsky Kuzbass Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care
- Issue: Vol 10, No 4 (2020)
- Pages: 361-363
- Section: Сlinical observations
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/uroved/article/view/48569
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved48569
- ID: 48569
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The case report presents a clinical observation of urethral erosion that developed after a long-term presence of a urethral catheter in a patient after implantation of an artificial bladder sphincter. The stages of the patient’s surgical treatment are described. The frequency of such complications in patients with an established artificial bladder sphincter according to literature data is presented.
Full Text
About the authors
Pavel S. Kyzlasov
State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia
Email: dr.kyzlasov@mail.ru
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor of Department Urology and Andrology, Head of Center of Urology and Andrology
Russian Federation, 123098, Moscow, Marshala Novikova street, 23Ali T. Mustafaev
State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia
Email: dr.mustafayevat@gmail.com
Postgraduate
Russian Federation, 123098, Moscow, Marshala Novikova street, 23Daniil V. Kazantsev
State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: kazancev_daniil@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2745-8359
Clinical Resident
Russian Federation, 123098, Moscow, Marshala Novikova street, 23Evgenii V. Volokitin
Podgorbunsky Kuzbass Clinical Hospital of Emergency Medical Care
Email: evgvolokitin82@mail.ru
Urologist
Russian Federation, 650000, Kemerovo, N. Ostrovskogo street, 22References
- Leibovich BC, Barrett DM. Use of the artificial urinary sphincter in men and women. World J Urol. 1997;15(5):316-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02202018.
- Elliott DS, Barrett DM. Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases. J Urol. 1998;159(4):1206-1208.
- Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM, Fishman IJ. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol. 2001;166(5):1755-1758.
- Raj GV, Peterson AC, Toh KL, Webster GD. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 2005;173(4):1242-1245. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000152315.91444.d0.
- Lai HH, Hsu EI, Teh BS, et al. 13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine. J Urol. 2007;177(3):1021-1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.062.
- Agarwal DK, Linder BJ, Elliott DS. Artificial urinary sphincter urethral erosions: Temporal patterns, management, and incidence of preventable erosions. Indian J Urol. 2017;33(1):26-29. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.195758.
- Jamaer C, De Bruyn H, Van Renterghem A, et al. Penoscrotal Incision for the Primary Implantation of an Artificial Urinary Sphincter. Curr Urol. 2020;14(2):74-78. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499256.
Supplementary files
