Dynamics of clinical manifestations and cytokine levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated with upadacitinib therapy

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, it has become evident that despite extensive data obtained from randomised placebo-controlled trials, which are still the golden standard for assessing the efficacy and safety of therapy, there are still some fundamentally important questions regarding the optimal management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In this regard, it is extremely relevant to assess the results of therapy in real clinical practice. Currently, much attention is paid to the study of the level of proinflammatory cytokines, both as markers of inflammatory activity of rheumatoid arthritis and monitoring the prognosis of anti-inflammatory therapy efficacy. In Russia, there are no works devoted to the study of cytokine concentration dynamics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis on the background upadacitinib therapy, which proves the relevance of the following study.

AIM: To investigate the dynamics of clinical and laboratory values of inflammatory activity of the disease and cytokines in patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated with upadacitinib therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 10 patients with a reliable diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis: patients’ age was 46.30 ± 10.20 years and disease duration was 12.00 (3.00–21.00) years. All the patients had moderate to high disease activity: Disease Activity Score-28 with erythrocyte sedimentation rate 5.48 (4.50–5.80), Clinical Disease Activity Index 28.00 (19.50–32.00) and Simple Disease Activity Index 29.18 (19.51–33.05). All the patients included in the study were treated with upadacitinib at a dose of 15 mg once a day against the background of the therapy with methotrexate, leflunomide, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and glucocorticoids. Observation was carried out before treatment and after 3, 6 months of therapy. Serum levels of 15 cytokines: interleukin-1β, -4, -6, -10, -17A, -17F, -21, -22, -23, -25, -31, -33, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interferon gamma, soluble СD40 ligand were studied using multiplex xMAP technology.

RESULTS: After 3 and 6 months of upadacitinib therapy, there was a significant decrease in Disease Activity Score-28 with erythrocyte sedimentation rate 3.78 (2.53–4.20) and 3.5 (2.00–3.68), Clinical Disease Activity Index 12.00 (5.00–17.34) and 9.0 (3.00–11.00), Simple Disease Activity Index 12.38 (5.02–17.00) and 9.61 (3.06–11.60), erythrocyte sedimentation rate 19.0 (11.0–26.0), 7.0 (4.0–18.0), CRP 0.56 (0.50–1.99), 0.71 (0.51–1.1). The values of erythrocyte sedimentation rate decreased after 3 months of treatment (baseline 21.0 (15.0–25.0) mm/hour, after 3 months 14,0 (11,0–17,0) mm/hour. After 6 months of upadacitinib therapy, there was a significant decrease in interleukin-10 (p < 0.05) and interleukin-33 (p < 0.01) levels compared to baseline. On the contrary, the level of interleukin-25 increased by the 6th month of treatment (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study indicate the effectiveness of upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis, and also provide grounds for further study of the pathogenetic mechanisms of cytokine-dependent inflammation in this disease.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

N. A. Lapkina

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: lanaal@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2692-399X

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

A. A. Baranov

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Email: bara_aa@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7847-1679

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

N. Yu. Levshin

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Email: levshin_nikolaiy@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4846-4931

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

J. A. Malysheva

Yaroslavl State Medical University

Email: jmalysheva76@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-5699-9794

Assistant

Russian Federation, Yaroslavl

V. N. Amirdzhanova

V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology

Email: amirver@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5382-6357

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

A. S. Artyukhov

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: alexanderartyuhov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7180-1778

Cand. Sci. (Biol.)

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Barton A, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;8(4):18001. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.1
  2. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, et al. T2T Expert Committee. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(4):631–637. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.123919
  3. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(6):685–699. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655
  4. Schwartz DM, Kanno Y, Villarino A, et al. JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(12):843–862. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.201
  5. Nasonov EL, Lila AM. Janus kinase inhibitors in immuno-inflammatory rheumatic diseases: New opportunities and prospects. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2019;57(1):8–16. (In Russ.). doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2 019-8-16
  6. McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012;365(23):2205–2219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1004965
  7. Brennan FM, McInnes IB. Evidence that cytokines play a role in rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:3537–3545. doi: 10.1172/JCI36389
  8. Nasonov EL, Avdeeva AS, Lila AM. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases (Part I). Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2020;58(1):62–79. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14412/1995-4484-2020-62-79
  9. Dhillon S. Tofacitinib: A review in rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs. 2017;77(18):1987–2001. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0835-9
  10. Al-Salama ZT, Scott LJ. Baricitinib: A review in rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs. 2018;78(7):761–772. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0908-4
  11. Tanaka Y. A review of upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2020;30(5):779–787. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1782049
  12. Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Combe B, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-BEYOND): A double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10139):2513–2524. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31116-4
  13. Mysler E, Lizarraga A. Phase III trials of JAK1 selective inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2021;60:17–23. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa823
  14. Fleischmann R, Pangan AL, Song IH, et al. Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: Results of a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(11):1788–1800. doi: 10.1002/art.41032
  15. Smolen JS, Pangan AL, Emery P, et al. Upadacitinib as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate (SELECT-MONOTHERAPY): A randomised, placebo controlled, double-blind phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;393(10188):2303–2311. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30419-2
  16. Strand V, Pope J, Tundia N, et al. Upadacitinib improves patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs: Results from SELECT-NEXT. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2037-1
  17. Kapetanovic MC, Andersson M, Friedman A, et al. SAT0145 Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib monotherapy in MTX-naive patients with early active RA receiving treatment within 3 months of diagnosis: A post-hoc analysis of the SELECT-EARLY. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:1011. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.1431
  18. Amirjanova VN, Karateev AE, Pogozheva EY, et al. The first experience of using upadacitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in real clinical practice (results of the multicenter project “RACURS”). Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2021;59(5):571–577. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47360/1995-4484-2021-571-577
  19. Amirjanova VN, Karateev AE, Pogozheva EYu, et al. Are the goals of therapy achievable in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving upadacitinib in real clinical practice? Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2022;60(3):327–333. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47360/1995-4484-2022-327-333
  20. Parmentier JM, Voss J, Graff C, et al. In vitro and in vivo characterization of the JAK1 selectivity of upadacitinib (ABT-494). BMC Rheumatol. 2018;2:23. doi: 10.1186/s41927-018-0031-x
  21. Sornasse T, Sokolove J, McInnes I. Treatment with upadacitinib results in the normalization of key pathobiologic pathways in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71 (suppl 10).
  22. Lent S, Sornasse T, Georgantas R, et al. Molecular analysis of the mode of action of upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis patients: Whole blood RNA expression data from the SELECT-NEXT Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71 (suppl 10).
  23. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569–2581. doi: 10.1002/art.27584
  24. Nasonov EL, Karateev DE. Revmatoidnyi artrit. In: Rheumatology. Russian clinical guidelines. Ed. by E.L. Nasonov. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2020. P. 17–57. (In Russ.)
  25. Mohamed MF, Klünder B, Othman AA. Clinical pharmacokinetics of upadacitinib: review of data relevant to the rheumatoid arthritis indication. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020;59(5):531–544. doi: 10.1007/s40262-019-00855-0
  26. Boyce EG, Rogan EL, C Lui M. Upadacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an extensive review. Ann Pharmacother. 2023;57(4):450–462. doi: 10.1177/10600280221113092
  27. Lapkina NA, Baranov AA, Abaytova NE, et al. Dynamics of clinical manifestations and cytokine concentrations in rheumatoid arthritis patients on tofacitinib therapy. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2021;59(6):693–699. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47360/1995-4484-2021-693-699

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 71733 от 08.12.2017.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies