Study of the PDO index predictability for 1 to 5 years with INMCM5

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) index has been calculated using the INMCM5 climate model developed by the Marchuk Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences. The PDO index correlation with the reanalysis data decreases from about 1.0 in November of the starting year to 0.355 in October of the following year. The model forecast for the PDO index is reliable for the first 2 years, but correlation coefficients decline significantly after that. The inertial forecast is more accurate in the first 2 years and becomes less reliable onward. The correlation coefficient for the model ensemble forecast of the PDO index with its components in the ensemble is greater than the correlation between the ensemble average and the actual PDO index. The INMCM5 climate model is suggested to have potential for considerable improvement in forecasting the PDO.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

M. Aleksandrov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: aleksandrovms@my.msu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

E. Volodin

Marchuk Institute of Numerical Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: volodinev@gmail.com
俄罗斯联邦

V. Vorobyeva

Marchuk Institute of Numerical Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: VVorobyeva@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦

参考

  1. Володин Е.М. Воспроизведение современного климата моделью климатической системы INMCM60 // Известия РАН. Физика атмосферы и океана. 2023. T. 59. № 1. С. 19–26.
  2. Воробьева В.В., Володин Е.М. Экспериментальные исследования сезонной предсказуемости погоды, выполненные на основе климатической модели ИВМ РАН // Матем. моделирование. 2020. Т. 32. № 11. С. 47–58.
  3. Blagodatskikh D. Comparison of computational efficiency of two versions of a terrain-following ocean climate model // Numerical methods and programming. 2023. V. 24. № 4. P. 440–449.
  4. Blagodatskikh D., Iakovlev N., Volodin E., Gritsun A. Non-local discretization of the isoneutral diffusion operator in a terrain-following climate ocean model // Russian Journal of Numerical Analysis and Mathematical Modelling. 2023. V. 38. № 6. P. 353–360.
  5. Bock L., Lauer A., Schlund M. et al. Quantifying progress across different CMIP phases with the ESMValTool // Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2020. V. 125. № 21. P. e2019JD032321.
  6. Boer G.J., Smith D.M., Cassou C. et al. The Decadal Climate Prediction Project (DCPP) contribution to CMIP6 // Geosci. Model Dev. 2016. V. 9. № 10. P. 3751–3777.
  7. Carton J.A., Chepurin G.A., Chen L. SODA3: A new ocean climate reanalysis // J. Clim. 2018. V. 31. № 17. P. 6967–6983.
  8. Dee D.P., Uppala S.M., Simmons A.J. et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system // Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc. 2011. V. 137. № 656. P. 553–597.
  9. Deser C., Alexande M., Xie S., Phillips A. Sea surface temperature variability: patterns and mechanisms // Annual review of marine science. 2010. V. 2. P. 115–143.
  10. Eyring V., Bony S., Meehl G.A. et al. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization // Geosci. Model Dev. 2016. V. 9. № 5. P. 1937–1958.
  11. Hersbach H., Bell B., Berrisford P., Hirahara S. The ERA5 global reanalysis // Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc. 2020. V. 146. № 730. P. 1999–2049.
  12. Mantua N., Hare S., Zhang Y. et al. A Pacific Interdecadal Climate Oscillation with impacts on salmon production // Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1997. V. 78. № 6. P. 1069–1080.
  13. Meehl G., Goddard L., Murphy J. et al. Decadal prediction: can it be skillful? // Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2009. V. 90. № 10. P. 1467–1485.
  14. O’Neill B., Tebaldi C., Vuuren D. et al. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 // Geoscientific Model Development Discussions. 2016. V. 9. № 9. P. 3461–3482.
  15. Taylor K.E., Stouffer R.J., Meehl G.A. An Overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design // Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2012. V. 93. № 4. P. 485–498.
  16. Volodin E.M., Mortikov E.V., Kostrykin S.V. et al. Simulation of the present day climate with the climate model INMCM5 // Clim. Dyn. 2017. V. 49. № 11. P. 3715–3734.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. The first EOF of SST in the North Pacific Ocean based on ERA-Interim data.

下载 (289KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. TDC index based on ERA-Interim data.

下载 (197KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 3. Graph of the correlation between the real and predicted TDC indices during the first year of the forecast.

下载 (136KB)
索引源数据
5. Fig. 4. TDC index, average per month during the first year of the forecast.

下载 (214KB)
索引源数据
6. Fig. 5. Average TDC index for 5 years.

下载 (260KB)
索引源数据
7. Fig. 6. Dependence of the correlation coefficient of the inertial forecast on its lead time.

下载 (109KB)
索引源数据
8. Fig. 7. Dependence of the correlation coefficient of the model ensemble forecast of the TDK index with its own individual realizations in the ensemble on the month: average – in black, minimum – in blue, maximum – in orange for different members of the ensemble during the first year of the forecast. In green – the correlation coefficient between the ensemble average and the actual TDK index.

下载 (174KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024