Magnetic Carbon Nanocomposites: Preparation from Cellulose via Chemical Activation with FeCl3 and Characterization

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

We have studied the preparation of magnetic graphitic carbon composites, which combine the adsorption properties of activated carbon with magnetic properties and properties intrinsic to graphite. The preparation method is efficient; it comprises modifying flax shive cellulose with citric acid to enhance the chelating ability of the flax shive cellulose matrix, impregnating the modified cellulose with iron chloride, and pyrolysis in an inert atmosphere to control the composition, morphology, specific surface, and porosity of hybrid carbon materials. The scenario of cellulose matrix pyrolysis was suggested using thermogravimetry. X-ray structural analysis was used to characterize the graphitic composites. The citric acid modification of cellulose helps to prepare a high-graphite (74%) carbon composite where the graphitization level of the graphite structure approaches the graphitization level of commercially available graphite at 700°С. Low-temperature N2 adsorption–desorption and ζ-potential measurements helped to suggest the adsorption mechanism for environmentally hazardous dyes. The greatest equilibrium adsorption of Methylene Blue (MB) and Methyl Orange (MO) dyes was 127.4 and 23.7 mg/g, respectively. The prepared composites can be used as adsorbents and fillers in polymer composite materials.

About the authors

A. N. Prusov

Krestov Institute of Solution Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: anp@isc-ras.ru
153045, Ivanovo, Russia

S. M. Prusova

Krestov Institute of Solution Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: anp@isc-ras.ru
153045, Ivanovo, Russia

M. V. Radugin

Krestov Institute of Solution Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: anp@isc-ras.ru
153045, Ivanovo, Russia

References

  1. Niazi L., Lashanizadegan A., Sharififard H. // J. Clean. Prod. 2018. V. 185. P. 554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.026
  2. Zhang B., Zeng X., Xu P. et al. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016. V. 50. P. 11837. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01919
  3. Erdem H., Erdem M. // Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2022. V. 12. P. 3513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00963-z
  4. Bekhoukh A., Moulefera I., Zeggai F.Z. et al. // J. Polym. Environ. 2022. V. 30. P. 886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-021-02248-6
  5. Rashidi N.A., Yusup S. // Chem. Eng. J. 2017. V. 314. P. 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.059
  6. Klasson K.T., Wartelle L.H., Lima I.M. et al. // Bioresour. Technol. 2009. V. 100. P. 5045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.068
  7. Ogungbenro A.E., Quang D.V., Al-Ali K.A. et al. // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020. V. 8. P. 104257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104257
  8. Somasundaram S.K., Sekar Gupta V.K., Ganesan S. // J. Mol. Liq. 2013. V. 177. P. 416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2012.09.022
  9. Ahmed M.J. // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016. V. 4. P. 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.10.027
  10. Prusov A.N., Prusova S.M., Radugin M.V. et al. // Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N. 2021. V. 29. P. 685. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2021.188106
  11. Ahmed M.J., Theydan S.K. // Powder Technol. 2012. V. 229. P. 237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.06.043
  12. Ma J., Zhou L., Dan W. et al. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015. V. 446. P. 298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.01.036
  13. Teng H.S., Yeh T.S., Hsu L.Y. // Carbon. 1998. V. 36. P. 1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00127-4
  14. Hamouda H.A., Cui S., Dai X. et al. // RSC Adv. 2021. V. 11. P. 354. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA09509E
  15. Xu Z., Sun Z., Zhou Y. et al. // Colloids Surf., A. 2019. V. 582. P. 123934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.123934
  16. Khiari B., Ferjani A.I., Azzaz A.A. et al. // Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2021. V. 11. P. 325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00641-0
  17. Rodríguez-Sánchez S., Díaz P., Ruiz B. et al. // J. Environ. Manage. 2022. V. 312. P. 114897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114897
  18. Прусов А.Н., Прусова С.М., Базанов А.В. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2019. Т. 64. С. 431.
  19. Feng H., Li J., Wang L. // BioRes. 2010. V. 5. № 3. P. 1484. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.5.3.1484-1495.
  20. Cox M., Pichugin A.A., El-Shafey E.I. et al. // Hydrometallurgy. 2005. V. 78. P. 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2004.12.006
  21. Wang C., Yang Q., Ren N. et al. // Chem. Eng. Commun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2020.1826940
  22. Hu W., Zhang M., Ton-That M.-T. et al. // Fiber. Polym. 2014. V. 15. P. 1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-1722-6
  23. Prusov A.N., Prusova S.M., Radugin M.V. et al. // Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N. 2021. V. 29. P. 232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2020.1832994
  24. Bedia J., Monsalvo V.M., Rodriguez J.J. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2017. V. 318. P. 224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.096
  25. Bedia J., Belver C., Ponce S. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2018. V. 333. P. 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.161
  26. Vasu A.E., Archana A.P.M.S., Sagayaraj A.C. et al. // Chem. Commun. 2022. V. 141. P. 109541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2022.109541
  27. Hermosa G.C., Liao C.-S., Wan. S.-F. et al. // J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2021. V. 21. P. 5756. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2021.19494
  28. Vaughana T., Seoa C.W., Marshall W.E. // Bioresour. Technol. 2001. P. 78. P. 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00007-4
  29. Prusov A.N., Prusova S.M., Zakharov A.G. et al. // Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N. 2019. V. 27. P. 967. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2019.1679780
  30. Prusov A.N., Prusova S.M., Radugin M.V. et al. // Fuller. Nanotub. Car. N. 2022. V. 30. P. 1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2022.2057965
  31. Kuang Y., Zhang X., Zhou S. // Water. 2020. V. 12. P. 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020587
  32. Destyorini F., Irmawati Y., Hardiansyah A. et al. // Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2021. V. 24. P. 514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2020.06.011
  33. Bacon BY G.E. // Acta Cryst. 1951. V. 4. P. 558. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0365110x51001781
  34. Dai C., Wan J., Yang S. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018. V. 444. P. 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.261
  35. Dizbay-Onat M., Vaidya U.K., Balanay J.A.G. et al. // Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2018. V. 36. № 1–2. P. 441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263617417700635
  36. Krivoruchko O.P., Zaikovskii V.I. // Mendeleev Commun. 1998. V. 8. № 3. P. 97. https://doi.org/10.1070/MC1998v008n03ABEH000944
  37. Hoekstra J., Beale M., Soulimani F. et al. // Carbon. 2016. V. 197. P. 248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.05.065
  38. Xu Z., Zhou Y., Sun Z. et al. // Chemosphere. 2020. V. 241. P. 125120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125120
  39. Jozwiak W.K., Kaczmarek E., Maniecki T.P. et al. // Appl. Catal. A: General. 2007. V. 326. P. 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2007.03.021
  40. Li H., Zhang H., Li K. et al. // Fuel. 2020. V. 279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118531
  41. Rufford. T.E., Hulicova-Jurcakova D., Zhu. Z. // J. Mater. Res. 2011. V. 25. P. 1451. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2010.0186
  42. Zhu X., Liu Y., Luo G. et al. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014. V. 48. P. 5840. https://doi.org/10.1021/es500531c
  43. Thommes M., Kaneko K., Neimark A.V. et al. // Pure Appl. Chem. 2015. V. 87. P. 1051. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117
  44. Cychosz K.A., Thommes M. // Engineering. 2018. V. 4. P. 559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.06.001
  45. Udayakumar M., Mrabate B.E., Koós T. et al. // Arabian J. Chem. 2021. V. 14. P. 103214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103214
  46. Janani B., Mohaimeed A.M.A., Raju L.L. et al. // J. Environ. Health Sci. Engineer. 2021. V. 19. P. 389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00612-1
  47. Istratie R., Stoia M., Păcurariu C. et al. // Arabian J. Chem. 2019. V. 12. P. 3704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.12.012
  48. Fan W., Gao W., Zhang C. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. 2012. V. 22. P. 25108. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM35609K
  49. Karagöza S., Tay T., Ucar S. et al. // Bioresour. Technol. 2008. V. 99. P. 6214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.019
  50. Pittman C.U., He G.R., Wu B. et al. // Carbon. 1997. V. 35. № 3. P. 317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(97)89608-X

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2.

Download (141KB)
Indexing metadata
3.

Download (167KB)
Indexing metadata
4.

Download (211KB)
Indexing metadata
5.

Download (1MB)
Indexing metadata
6.

Download (134KB)
Indexing metadata
7.

Download (128KB)
Indexing metadata
8.

Download (26KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2023 А.Н. Прусов, С.М. Прусова, М.В. Радугин