A NEW ENDOSCOPIC VEIN HARVESTING TECHNIQUE FOR CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

During coronary artery bypass surgery, the great saphenous vein is traditionally harvested via soft tissue dissection along the entire length of the extracted conduit, which is very traumatic and leads to the development of wound complications. The emergence of endoscopic harvesting techniques has substantially could reduce the frequency of the latter. However, the data published and the results of meta-analyses indicate the worst mid-term patency of endoscopically harvested shunts. This is associated with an excessive mechanical impact on the vein wall and with carbon dioxide insufflation. Vein harvesting in the flap with the surrounding tissues, which is called a «notouch» technique, allows virtually eliminating any direct mechanical effect on the venous conduit wall, ensuring the morphofunctional integrity of a future shunt. Due to this, the procedure has the best medium- and long-term results, but it is more traumatic for the lower limb. The technique developed at the Research Institute of Cardiology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, to endoscopically harvest the great saphenous vein in the flap with the surrounding tissues and that for its traditional open harvesting underwent comprehensive comparative assessment. The study enrolled 315 patients who were prospectively randomized into endoscopic (n = 156) and open (n = 159) vein harvesting groups. Intraoperative data, postoperative clinical course, and features of wound healing were analyzed. Endoscopic harvesting of the greater saphenous vein was shown to reduce the total duration of interventions and the number of wound complications. Thus, the developed endoscopic harvesting technique not only allows one to adhere to the «no-touch» technique, but is also less traumatic for the lower extremities.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yu. Vechersky

Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences

MD, Research Institute of Cardiology Tomsk

D. Manvelyan

Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: manvello9@yandex.ru
Research Institute of Cardiology Tomsk

V. Zatolokin

Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences

MD, Research Institute of Cardiology Tomsk

V. Shipulin

Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences

MD, Research Institute of Cardiology Tomsk

B. Kozlov

Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences

MD, Research Institute of Cardiology Tomsk

References

  1. Motwani J., Topol E. Aortocoronary saphenous vein graft disease: pathogenesis, predisposition, and prevention // Circulation. - 1998; 97 (9): 916-31.
  2. Verrier E., Boyle E. Jr. Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery: an overview // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 1997; 64 (4): S2-S8.
  3. Harskamp R., Lopes R., Baisden C. et al. Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery: pathophysiology, management, and future directions // Ann. Surg. - 2013; 257 (5): 824-33. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318288c38d.
  4. Gundry S., Jones M., Ishihara T. et al. Optimal preparation techniques for human saphenous vein grafts // Surgery. - 1980; 88 (6): 785-94.
  5. Kopjar T., Dashwood M. Endoscopic versus «no-touch» saphenous vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: a trade-off between wound healing and graft patency // Angiology. - 2016; 67 (2): 121-32. doi: 10.1177/0003319715584126.
  6. Lopes R., Hafley G., Allen K. et al. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2009; 361 (3): 235-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900708.
  7. Zenati M., Shroyer A., Collins J. et al. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest technique on late coronary artery bypass grafting patient outcomes in the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) Trial // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2011; 141 (2): 338-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.004.
  8. Sastry P., Rivinius R., Harvey R. et al. The influence of endoscopic vein harvesting on outcomes after coronary bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of 267 525 patients // Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic Surg. - 2013; 44 (6): 980-9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ ezt121.
  9. Harky A., Balmforth D., Shipolini A. et al. Is endoscopic long saphenous vein harvesting equivalent to open harvesting technique in terms of graft patency? // Inter. Cardiovasc. Thorac. surg. - 2017; 25 (2): 323-6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx049.
  10. Kiani S., Desai P., Thirumvalavan N. et al. Endoscopic venous harvesting by inexperienced operators compromises venous graft remodeling // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2012; 93 (1): 11-8. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.athoracsur.2011.06.026.
  11. Rousou L., Taylor K., Lu X. et al. Saphenous vein conduits harvested by endoscopic technique exhibit structural and functional damage // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2009; 87 (1): 62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.049.
  12. Suarez-Pierre A., Terasaki Y., Magruder J. et al. Complications of CO2 insufflation during endoscopic vein harvesting // J. Cardiac Surg. - 2017; 32 (12): 783-9. doi: 10.1111/jocs.13249.
  13. Souza D., Christofferson R., Bomfim V. et al. "No-touch" technique using saphenous vein harvested with its surrounding tissue for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains an intact endothelium // Scand. Cardiovasc. J. - 1999; 33 (6): 323-9.
  14. Samano N., Geijer H., Liden M. et al. The no-touch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency, after 16 years, comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: a randomized trial // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2015; 150 (4): 880-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.027.
  15. Souza D., Dashwood M., Tsui J. et al. Improved patency in vein grafts harvested with surrounding tissue: results of a randomized study using three harvesting techniques // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2002; 73 (4): 1189-95.
  16. Чернявский А.М., Лавренюк О.В., Волков А.М. и др. Непосредственные сравнительные результаты эндоскопического и открытого выделения большой подкожной вены при коронарном шунтировании // Патология кровообращения и кардиохирургия. - 2012; 16 (4): 15-9.
  17. Neumann F. et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization // Eur. Heart J. - 2018; 40 (2): 87-165.
  18. Lamberton G., Hsi R., Jin D. et al. Prospective comparison of four laparoscopic vessel ligation devices // J. Endourol. - 2008; 22 (10): 2307-12.
  19. Загатин М.М., Пайвин А.А., Волков А.М. и др. Эндоскопическое выделение вен в хирургии ишемической болезни сердца // Вестн. Росс. военно-мед. акад. - 2013; 3: 7-10 [Zagatin M.M., Payvin A.A., Volkov A.M. et al. Experience the of endoscopic vein harvesting in coronary heart disease surgery // Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. - 2013; 3: 7-10 (in Russ.)].
  20. Rao C., Aziz O., Deeba S. et al. Isminimallyinvasiveharvesting of the great saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery a cost-effective technique? // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2008; 135 (4): 809-15. DOI: 10.1016/j. jtcvs.2007.09.042.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies